Elsevier

Advances in Medical Sciences

Volume 60, Issue 2, September 2015, Pages 246-252
Advances in Medical Sciences

Original Research Article
Determination of faecal inflammatory marker concentration as a noninvasive method of evaluation of pathological activity in children with inflammatory bowel diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2015.04.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The optimization of procedure evaluating the severity of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) using non-invasive methods.

Patients/methods

One hundred and nine children with IBD hospitalized in gastroenterology ward between 2009 and 2011 participated in the study. Activity of the disease was evaluated in each patient. Concentration of three inflammatory markers: dimeric form of tumor pyruvate kinase (M2-PK), calprotectin and lactoferrin was evaluated using immunoenzymatic tests.

Results

Existence of a significant correlation between the faecal level of all tested markers and the stage of clinical activity of the disease was demonstrated in children with IBD, both in Crohn's disease (M2-PK p < 0.01; calprotectin p = 0.005; lactoferrin p < 0.01) and in ulcerative colitis group (M2-PK p < 0.01; calprotectin p = 0.004; lactoferrin p < 0.01). A significant difference in the level of markers was found between children with unclassified colitis and the group of patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, but there was no difference between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The increase in the level of one marker correlated with increasing level of other markers (p < 0.01).

Faecal markers seem to correlate well with majority of indicators of inflammatory condition in blood.

Conclusions

Measuring M2-PK, lactoferrin and calprotectin levels in faeces seem to be a useful indicator of the level of disease activity in children with IBD.

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and incurable inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common forms are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Etiology of those diseases has not been determined yet. Possible causes include patient's genetic susceptibility and a defect in functioning of the immunological system of the gastrointestinal tract (gastrointestinal-associated lymphoid tissue – GALT). Majority of researchers agree that some microbiological agents (autochthonic flora or pathogenic microorganism) cause and/or maintain the inflammatory condition. Approximately 10–15% of patients with IBD do not fulfil a full range of criteria of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The symptoms of both pathologies may overlap. Those cases are commonly qualified as unclassified colitis (IBDU – Inflammatory bowel disease unclassified) [1]. The group of IBD includes also other – sporadically occurring pathologies – such as Behcet's disease, collagenous colitis, microscopic colitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Diagnostic and therapeutic scheme of IBD is based mostly on invasive and painful procedures (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, rectoscopy, etc.). IBD diagnostics has been improved by histological examination of specimens obtained by endoscopic biopsy. Diagnostics is aimed at evaluating the extension and intensity of inflammatory lesions, and at detecting and treating the complications. Unfortunately, preliminary diagnosis is often blurred by similar clinical presentation of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Final diagnosis cannot be reached based on examination in as many as 10% of patients, and some other percent of diagnoses are erroneous [2], [3]. Diagnostic scheme of IBD patients includes also imaging techniques and laboratory tests. Endoscopic procedures constitute a basis for diagnosis and selection of therapy. Considering the incurable character of the disease, those examinations and tests have to be performed repeatedly throughout the whole life of a patient. However, their high invasiveness limits their availability and is not accepted by patients, especially by children [4].

Such additional diagnostic methods are sought that – with maintained diagnostic parameters – would be non-invasive and non-burdening for a patient [5], [6], [7]. Markers of inflammatory condition determined in faeces could be the future of non-invasive IBD diagnostics. Those markers seem to be helpful in confirming IBD diagnosis and in evaluating the intensity of inflammatory condition. Their faecal level is positively correlated with activity of the pathological process. The test allows for identifying the inflammation onset in an asymptomatic form, and therefore gives a chance for effective therapy. The researchers are still searching for a marker of enteric inflammatory condition that would be specific for IBD and could provide a differential diagnosis from other conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. From the laboratory and practical point of view it is important that the marker would be highly stable. Lactoferrin and calprotectin are well studied markers [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. A dimeric form of tumor pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) seems to be a new and promising marker [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. That parameter proved effective in the screening of colonic carcinoma, polyps and adenomas. Rare available analyses indicate its possible use in IBD patients.

The main aim of this study was to analyze the simultaneous determination of several markers that seem to significantly increase the specificity of the test and to compare the results with clinical activity of IBD, which might mark the future of non-invasive IBD diagnostics.

Section snippets

Patients

One hundred and nine children, between 3 and 16 years of age, with IBD hospitalized in the First Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases of Poznan University of Medical Sciences between 2009 and 2011 participated in the study. Diagnosis of the disease was made according to the generally accepted scheme of diagnostic proceedings, including medical history (anamnesis), physical (subjective) examination, laboratory tests, endoscopic examination,

Results

The group of patients with IBD consisted of 64 boys and 45 girls. Table 2 summarizes the precise distribution of patients at individual levels of clinical activity of the disease.

Discussion

Introduction of faecal markers into the routine scheme of diagnostics of patients with IBD requires numerous analyses confirming their real usefulness. Lactoferrin and calprotectin have already been well studied. Lactoferrin in a group of patients with IBD was first evaluated in 1993 [10]. Studies evaluating usefulness of that marker in pediatric group are infrequent, but demonstrate a good correlation between activity of disease and faecal lactoferrin level [11], [12]. Results obtained in a

Conclusions

Although the measurement of M2-PK, lactoferrin and calprotectin as a diagnostic evaluation is relatively expensive and not without flaws, its numerous advantages such as high sensitivity, efficiency, relative precision and non-invasiveness, indicate that faecal markers of inflammation are worthy of including in the diagnostic process in children with IBD.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial disclosure

The study was supported by State Committee for Scientific Research funding – KBN (SCSR) 4248/B/PO1/2010/38.

References (27)

  • T.R. Walker et al.

    Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker of disease activity in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease

    J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2007)
  • A. Borkowska

    Laktoferyna w kale jako wykładnik aktywności procesu zapalnego w nieswoistych zapaleniach jelit u dzieci

    (2008)
  • O. Schröder et al.

    Prospective evaluation of faecal neutrophil-derived proteins in identifying intestinal inflammation: combination of parameters does not improve diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text