Original Research ArticleDetermination of faecal inflammatory marker concentration as a noninvasive method of evaluation of pathological activity in children with inflammatory bowel diseases
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and incurable inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common forms are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Etiology of those diseases has not been determined yet. Possible causes include patient's genetic susceptibility and a defect in functioning of the immunological system of the gastrointestinal tract (gastrointestinal-associated lymphoid tissue – GALT). Majority of researchers agree that some microbiological agents (autochthonic flora or pathogenic microorganism) cause and/or maintain the inflammatory condition. Approximately 10–15% of patients with IBD do not fulfil a full range of criteria of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The symptoms of both pathologies may overlap. Those cases are commonly qualified as unclassified colitis (IBDU – Inflammatory bowel disease unclassified) [1]. The group of IBD includes also other – sporadically occurring pathologies – such as Behcet's disease, collagenous colitis, microscopic colitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Diagnostic and therapeutic scheme of IBD is based mostly on invasive and painful procedures (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, rectoscopy, etc.). IBD diagnostics has been improved by histological examination of specimens obtained by endoscopic biopsy. Diagnostics is aimed at evaluating the extension and intensity of inflammatory lesions, and at detecting and treating the complications. Unfortunately, preliminary diagnosis is often blurred by similar clinical presentation of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Final diagnosis cannot be reached based on examination in as many as 10% of patients, and some other percent of diagnoses are erroneous [2], [3]. Diagnostic scheme of IBD patients includes also imaging techniques and laboratory tests. Endoscopic procedures constitute a basis for diagnosis and selection of therapy. Considering the incurable character of the disease, those examinations and tests have to be performed repeatedly throughout the whole life of a patient. However, their high invasiveness limits their availability and is not accepted by patients, especially by children [4].
Such additional diagnostic methods are sought that – with maintained diagnostic parameters – would be non-invasive and non-burdening for a patient [5], [6], [7]. Markers of inflammatory condition determined in faeces could be the future of non-invasive IBD diagnostics. Those markers seem to be helpful in confirming IBD diagnosis and in evaluating the intensity of inflammatory condition. Their faecal level is positively correlated with activity of the pathological process. The test allows for identifying the inflammation onset in an asymptomatic form, and therefore gives a chance for effective therapy. The researchers are still searching for a marker of enteric inflammatory condition that would be specific for IBD and could provide a differential diagnosis from other conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. From the laboratory and practical point of view it is important that the marker would be highly stable. Lactoferrin and calprotectin are well studied markers [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. A dimeric form of tumor pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) seems to be a new and promising marker [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. That parameter proved effective in the screening of colonic carcinoma, polyps and adenomas. Rare available analyses indicate its possible use in IBD patients.
The main aim of this study was to analyze the simultaneous determination of several markers that seem to significantly increase the specificity of the test and to compare the results with clinical activity of IBD, which might mark the future of non-invasive IBD diagnostics.
Section snippets
Patients
One hundred and nine children, between 3 and 16 years of age, with IBD hospitalized in the First Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases of Poznan University of Medical Sciences between 2009 and 2011 participated in the study. Diagnosis of the disease was made according to the generally accepted scheme of diagnostic proceedings, including medical history (anamnesis), physical (subjective) examination, laboratory tests, endoscopic examination,
Results
The group of patients with IBD consisted of 64 boys and 45 girls. Table 2 summarizes the precise distribution of patients at individual levels of clinical activity of the disease.
Discussion
Introduction of faecal markers into the routine scheme of diagnostics of patients with IBD requires numerous analyses confirming their real usefulness. Lactoferrin and calprotectin have already been well studied. Lactoferrin in a group of patients with IBD was first evaluated in 1993 [10]. Studies evaluating usefulness of that marker in pediatric group are infrequent, but demonstrate a good correlation between activity of disease and faecal lactoferrin level [11], [12]. Results obtained in a
Conclusions
Although the measurement of M2-PK, lactoferrin and calprotectin as a diagnostic evaluation is relatively expensive and not without flaws, its numerous advantages such as high sensitivity, efficiency, relative precision and non-invasiveness, indicate that faecal markers of inflammation are worthy of including in the diagnostic process in children with IBD.
Conflict of interests
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Financial disclosure
The study was supported by State Committee for Scientific Research funding – KBN (SCSR) 4248/B/PO1/2010/38.
References (27)
- et al.
A critical evaluation of serologic markers for inflammatory bowel disease
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2007) - et al.
Colonoscopy in inflamatory bowel disease. Diagnostic accuracy and proposal of an endoscopic score
Gastroenterology
(1987) - et al.
Epidemiology, genes and inflammatory bowel diseases in childhood
Dig Liver Dis
(2008) - et al.
Early onset IBD: what's the difference?
Dig Liver Dis
(2008) - et al.
Fecal markers: calprotectin and lactoferrin
Gastroenterol Clin North Am
(2012) - et al.
Diagnostic utility of faecal biomarkers in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
World J Gastroenterol
(2014) - et al.
IBD. Faecal calprotectin testing – the need for better standardization
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2014) - et al.
Clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of faecal calprotectin for IBD at first presentation to gastroenterology services in adults aged 16–50 years
J Crohns Colitis
(2015) - et al.
The use of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin in patients with IBD. Review
Acta Gastroenterol Belg
(2013) - et al.
A study to determine fecal lactoferrin in patients with ulcerative colitis
Jpn J Gastroenterol
(1993)