Elsevier

Acta Biomaterialia

Volume 7, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages 2492-2498
Acta Biomaterialia

Rapid isothermal substrate microfabrication of a biocompatible thermoplastic elastomer for cellular contact guidance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of microstructured substrates to study and influence cell orientation, which plays an important role in tissue functionality, has been of great interest lately. Silicon and poly(dimethylsiloxane) substrates have typically been used, but long processing times and exogenous protein surface coating, required to enhance cell viability, limit their use as large-scale platforms. There is thus a need for a non-biodegradable biocompatible substrate that allows rapid and low cost microfabrication. In this paper a styrene–(ethylene/butylene)–styrene block co-polymer (SEBS) microstructured by a rapid replication technique using low pressure an isothermal hot embossing approach has been demonstrated. SEBS substrates were treated with oxygen plasma to enhance cell adhesion and sterilized using ethylene oxide gas. While cell adhesion to and proliferation on these substrates was as good as on tissue culture polystyrene, cellular alignment on microstructured SEBS was also very high (97.7 ± 0.5%) when calculated within a 10° angle variation from the longitudinal axis. Furthermore, tissue sheets on microstructured SEBS have been produced and exhibited cellular alignment within the engineered tissue. In addition, these results were obtained without coating the material with exogenous proteins. Such substrates should be helpful in the culture of tissue engineered substitutes with an intrinsic orientation and to elucidate questions in cell biology.

Introduction

The production of living tissue engineered substitutes [1] requires adequate cell proliferation. Until now the most widely used cell culture surface has been flat polystyrene (PS). In order to mimic the organization of physiological tissue in tissue engineering cells have to grow in an oriented manner. This can be achieved via contact guidance, a principle by which cells align following physical cues, such as the silk fibers of spider webs [2] or surface topography, as used more commonly nowadays [3], [4], [5]. Tissue functionality is intimately related to tissue orientation, with such spatial three-dimensional organization giving the cornea its strength and transparence [6], [7], [8], tendons their mechanical properties [9], [10] and smooth muscle cell tissues from different organs their elasticity and compliance [11], [12]. For many tissue engineering and cell culture applications contact guidance provides an important stimulus to the cells and consequently dictates their physiological orientation [13], [14], [15].

The use of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) in microfabrication has frequently been explored [16], [17], as its optical, mechanical and biocompatible properties allow imaging, stretching and, to some extent, cell culture. Unfortunately, PDMS has a long processing time and limited biocompatibility. In order to promote cell adhesion for tissue engineering purposes it is necessary to use exogenous protein, like collagen or fibronectin, which then create regulatory obstacles for clinical applications [18]. Hard thermoplastic polymers like polystyrene (PS) [19] and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) [20] have also been used as contact guidance substrates. Usually produced by hot embossing using silicon master molds fabricated by standard lithographic techniques and reactive ion etching (RIE), hard thermoplastic substrates are less time consuming to produce compared with PDMS elastomer substrates. However, thermoforming of such PS and PMMA materials, among others, requires solving some specific issues related to mold fabrication and demolding due to the overall thermal and mechanical constraint upon the molding process, thus major attention is needed to establish the stability and integrity of the master mold over embossing runs [21], [22]. The use of metallic molds for hard plastics can be considered, but their production is cost-effective only for production runs and requires fabrication processes and equipments that are not commonly found in laboratory set-ups, especially in tissue engineering and biology laboratories. Thus there is a need for new materials and fabrication techniques that could provide rapid and low cost microstructuration, while providing biocompatibility and long-term viability. In this study the possibility of using a robust and high throughput thermoforming method in order to microstructure a low cost thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) has been demonstrated. By using a low pressure (1.6 bars) and rapid isothermal (3 min) hot embossing approach a large number of styrene–(ethylene/butylene)–styrene (SEBS) substrates have been fabricated. Using a low cost and highly stable SU-8 master mold prepared by standard lithography we have replicated more than 50 substrates of 6 inch2 area having gratings of 8 μm period and 1.5 μm depth.

Prior to use the SEBS substrates were treated with oxygen plasma and sterilized with ethylene oxide gas. By using SEBS substrates without any exogenous protein coating we were able to grow smooth muscle cells (SMC) and show cell proliferation comparable with commercially available tissue culture PS. Contact guidance, providing cellular orientation, was evaluated and more than 95% of cells were within a 10° angle shift from the longitudinal axis of the substrate grating. Tissue sheets were also produced using SMC cultured on microstructured SEBS substrates and cellular alignment persisted throughout the experiment.

Section snippets

Substrate fabrication

A Versaflex TPE SEBS block co-polymer was purchased from GLS Corp. (McHenry, IL). Versaflex was used in the form of sheets (3.0 mm thickness, 160 mm width and >10 m length) prepared by extrusion using a Killion KL100 single screw extruder (Killion Laboratories Inc., Houston, TX).

The master mold for TPE thermoforming was fabricated by standard SU-8 photolithography. SU-8 GM1040 photo-resist (Gersteltec, Pully, Switzerland) was spin-coated on a 6 inch silicon wafer (Silicon Quest International Inc.,

SEBS substrate microfabrication and surface characterization

As SEBS is a thermoplastic elastomer it can be extruded in sheets of different thicknesses and rolled onto a mandrel for later use (Fig. 1). This process makes SEBS block co-polymers more convenient to use than PDMS, which requires a pre-compounding step and degassing for each replication cycle. Indeed, extruded sheets can be stored over long periods of time (at least 2 years) without any noticeable degradation, making use of the material possible on demand without any additional preparation

Discussion

Microstructured substrates used for contact guidance in cell culture and tissue engineering need to be easily processed via microfabrication methods, in order to facilitate mass production, as well as providing good surface biocompatibility to promote cell adhesion. Many microstructured biodegradable polymers display such important characteristics [26], [27], but for some applications, like fundamental studies in cell biology [28] and sheet-based tissue engineering [29], [30], [31], a

Conclusions

In this paper we have shown that SEBS block co-polymers are a suitable alternative to the use of hard polymers like PS and elastomer polymers like PDMS for tissue engineering. Unlike PDMS, TPE can be used in the form of extruded sheets that provide off the shelf availability without the necessity of performing any pre-compounding step. The demonstrated microfabrication capabilities for SEBS substrates seem to be an appealing alternative to standard hot embossing techniques. With our isothermal

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Gauvin for help with manuscript preparation, and Cindy Perron and Helene Roberge for technical assistance. This work was supported jointly by the National Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institute for Health and Research.

References (37)

  • J.M. Curran et al.

    The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • N. l’Heureux et al.

    A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel

    FASEB J

    (1998)
  • G.H. Ross

    The cultivation of tissues in extraneous media as a method of morpho-genetic study

    Anat Rec

    (1912)
  • A.I. Teixeira et al.

    Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates

    J Cell Sci

    (2003)
  • C.S. Kamma-Lorger et al.

    Effects on collagen orientation in the cornea after trephine injury

    Mol Vis

    (2009)
  • H.A. Lynch et al.

    Effect of fiber orientation and strain rate on the nonlinear uniaxial tensile material properties of tendon

    J Biomech Eng

    (2003)
  • G. Lewis et al.

    Modeling the tensile behavior of human Achilles tendon

    Biomed Mater Eng

    (1997)
  • G.A. Holzapfel et al.

    Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling

    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Harvard–MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

    View full text