Elsevier

Acta Materialia

Volume 57, Issue 3, February 2009, Pages 812-822
Acta Materialia

The stress–strain response of nanocrystalline metals: A quantized crystal plasticity approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.035Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper develops a finite element-based model with quantized crystal plasticity (QCP) to study distinctive features of nanocrystalline (nc) metal behavior, including an enhanced flow stress, extended plastic transition strain and propensity for strain localization. The QCP feature is motivated by molecular dynamics simulations of dislocation loop propagation across nc grains, showing that the grain-averaged plastic strain jumps by discrete amounts. Further, a simple geometric analysis suggests that the magnitude of the jumps is ∼1/grain size, thereby incorporating a grain size effect. QCP simulations of 1000-grain polycrystals can reproduce the unique experimental stress–strain features of nc metals, but only if the probability density distribution for a slip event increases abruptly at a threshold stress ∼1/grain size. Possible explanations for such a unique signature are discussed in terms of dislocation loop expansion conditions that become important in the nc limit.

Introduction

Nanocrystalline (nc) metals are polycrystals with an average grain size less than 100 nm. This dramatic decrease in intrinsic length scale produces several distinct features; for example, the uniaxial stress–plastic strain data for electrodeposited nc Ni in Fig. 1 shows that the flow stress of nc metals can be a factor of two or more times that of conventional (>1 μm) grain size material. Further, an extended plastic transition strain (εtrans) is observed, over which the flow stress increases from an initial value σ0 to approximately 90% of the plateau stress (σplateau). This apparent hardening is associated with a micro-plastic regime where not all grains are plastically deforming, even when εp ∼0.2%, a value typically associated with macroplasticity in conventional grain size polycrystals [1], [2], [3]. Although the strain rate sensitivity is often larger, failure strains (εf) are often smaller, consistent with localized deformation [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Admittedly, such generalizations can be difficult since various synthesis techniques produce different microstructures with unique processing-induced defects [4], [5].

At present, the large increases in flow stress and εtrans with decreasing grain size are not fully understood. Experimental observations [6], [7], [8], [9] suggest dislocation activity is present, yet no permanent root mean square (RMS) strain is accumulated during plasticity, indicating little dislocation build-up [10], [11]. This is consistent with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations documenting the nucleation of dislocations at local stress concentrations in grain boundaries, their propagation through the grain and their subsequent absorption into surrounding grain boundaries [12], [13], [14]. Classical stress-reduction experiments on nc Ni show that the long-range (athermal) and short-range (thermal) stresses for dislocation propagation are large [15] and support a hypothesis that dislocation propagation is hindered by grain boundary pinning. Yet, the lack of a permanent RMS strain cited earlier suggests that these pinning sites do not prevent reverse dislocation motion upon unloading.

Several continuum models of nc plasticity have been developed, postulating 1/grain size strengthening due to the energetic contribution of depositing dislocation content at grain boundaries [16], [17], [18] or 1/(grain size)1/2 strengthening due to the nucleation of loops from grain boundary stress concentrations [17]. A novel finite element-based extension to study discrete slip events in grains predicts the extraordinary hardening observed in the micro-plastic regime, but it is based on the a priori assumption that successive slip events in grains require increasing stress [19]. Such an assumption is compatible with the stress-drop experiments cited earlier in which the effective stress is observed to increase with deformation [15]. Other models propose the accumulation of geometrically necessary dislocations between the grain boundary and interior [20], [21] and employ a two-phase approach with a distinct volume fraction for a “grain boundary phase” [22], [23] that can become dominant in the nc regime. However, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy shows that grain boundaries in electrodeposited nc Ni and vapor-phase condensed and consolidated nc Cu are sharp [4], indicating no separate disordered grain boundary phase.

The present work develops a finite element model based on a quantized crystal plasticity (QCP) constitutive relation to study nc metals [24]. This modeling approach employs a number of features that have been inspired by both atomistic modeling and experiment. In particular, MD work reveals that at the grain-averaged scale, dislocation propagation results in a change in both the average strain and stress for the active grain [25]. The QCP model captures these quantized jumps – slip events – via a crystal plasticity constitutive law. Since the magnitude of the largest strain jumps is ∼1/grain size, a size effect is introduced. Three key findings result from this scale-dependent QCP approach. First, an asymmetric distribution of critical resolved shear stress is needed to reproduce the experimental shape of the stress–strain curve at small grain size. Second, this distribution results in a substantial fraction of grains that have not slipped, even at the end of the transition regime, when plastic strains are typically much larger than 0.2%. Third, an Eshelby-type analysis suggests that the minimum critical resolved shear stress for complete loop expansion across a grain should increase with decreasing grain size. This last finding, coupled with strengthening due to grain boundary pinning sites, offers a rationale for the asymmetric distribution in critical stress mentioned above.

Section snippets

Polycrystalline geometry and boundary conditions

A polycrystal is defined with N × N × N grains, each represented by an eight-node, three-dimensional brick finite element (C3D8) using ABAQUS software [26]. Uniaxial tension is imposed via a constant macro-scopic strain rate ε˙global along the (global) z-direction with free surface boundary conditions on the x and y faces shown in Fig. 2. Each face-centered cubic (fcc) grain is approximated by a cube and assigned an initial crystallographic orientation. Compatibility and equilibrium are then

Overview

The elementary model results are presented first to show that experimental trends for nc Ni cannot be captured when uniform grain-to-grain values of τcrit and γtarget are used. Rather, the extended model with a grain-to-grain variation in τcrit (and γtarget) is needed to capture the global stress–strain behavior for nc Ni highlighted in Fig. 1.

Elementary model: spatially uniform values of τcrit and γtarget

An elementary model consisting of 1000 grains is used with microstructural and numerical parameters provided in Table 1. Fig. 6 shows γ(α) and τ(α) vs. ε

Discussion and conclusions

A QCP model is developed within a large strain finite element formulation with four key micro-structural features: anisotropic elastic moduli, a grain orientation distribution, a grain-to-grain distribution of critical resolved shear stress (τcrit) at which a slip event occurs, and a grain-to-grain distribution of the largest possible jump (γtarget) in plastic strain associated with a slip event. An important feature motivated by recent MD simulations is that the QCP model mimics the discrete

Acknowledgements

Support from the US National Science Foundation (DMR Award 0508987), the European Commission (FP6-NANOMESO, Grant No. 016710) and the Ohio Supercomputer Center is greatly appreciated.

References (43)

  • G. Saada

    Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Properties Microstruct Process

    (2005)
  • K.S. Kumar et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • M.A. Meyers et al.

    Prog Mater Sci

    (2006)
  • C.J. Youngdahl et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2001)
  • K.S. Kumar et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • R.C. Hugo et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • H. Van Swygenhoven et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • R.J. Asaro et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2005)
  • B. Zhu et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • D.H. Warner et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • A. Needleman et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2003)
  • E. Bitzek et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2008)
  • R.J. Asaro et al.

    Acta Metal

    (1985)
  • S.R. Kalidindi et al.

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (1992)
  • A. Brahme et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • Y. Shen et al.

    J Mech Phy Solids

    (2007)
  • F. Ebrahimi et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1999)
  • G. Saada

    Philos Mag

    (2005)
  • S. Brandstetter et al.

    Adv Mater

    (2006)
  • M.W. Chen et al.

    Science

    (2003)
  • Z. Budrovic et al.

    Science

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text