Elsevier

Acta Astronautica

Volume 90, Issue 1, September 2013, Pages 146-155
Acta Astronautica

Hypervelocity nuclear interceptors for asteroid disruption

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.04.028Get rights and content

Abstract

A direct intercept mission with nuclear explosives is the only practical mitigation option against the most probable impact threat of near-Earth objects (NEOs) with warning times much shorter than 10 years. However, state-of-the-art penetrating subsurface nuclear explosion technology limits the penetrator's impact velocity to less than approximately 300 m/s because higher impact velocities prematurely destroy the nuclear fusing mechanisms. Therefore, significant advances in hypervelocity nuclear interceptor/penetrator technology are required to enable a last-minute nuclear disruption mission with intercept velocities as high as 30 km/s. This paper briefly describes both the current and planned research activities at the Iowa State Asteroid Deflection Research Center for developing such a game-changing space technology to mitigate the most probable impact threat of NEOs with a short warning time.

Highlights

► The most probable impact threat of near-Earth objects (NEOs) with warning times much shorter than 10 years is considered. ► A direct intercept mission concept with nuclear explosives is proposed. ► Significant advances in hypervelocity nuclear interceptor/penetrator technology are required.

Introduction

A growing interest currently exists for developing a plan to protect the Earth from the future possibility of a catastrophic impact by a hazardous asteroid or comet. In a recent letter on NEOs from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to the U.S. Senate and Congress, the White House OSTP strongly recommends that NASA takes the lead in conducting research activities for the development of NEO detection, characterization, and deflection technologies [1]. Furthermore, President Obama's new National Space Policy specifically directs NASA to “pursue capabilities, in cooperation with other departments, agencies, and commercial partners, to detect, track, catalog, and characterize NEOs to reduce the risk of harm to humans from an unexpected impact on our planet.” The Planetary Defense Task Force of the NASA Advisory Council also recommended that the NASA Office of the Chief Technologist (OCT) begin efforts to investigate asteroid deflection techniques. With national interest growing in the United States, the NEO threat detection and mitigation problem was recently identified as one of NASA's Space Technology Grand Challenges.

The Asteroid Deflection Research Center (ADRC) at Iowa State University has been developing strategies and technologies for deflection or disruption of hazardous NEOs. As the first university research center in the United States dedicated to such a complex engineering problem, the ADRC was founded in 2008 to address the engineering challenges and technology development critical to NEO impact threat mitigation.

Although various NEO deflection technologies, such as nuclear explosions, kinetic impactors, and slow-pull gravity tractors (GTs), have been proposed during the past two decades, there is no consensus on how to reliably deflect or disrupt hazardous NEOs in a timely manner [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Furthermore,due to various uncertainties in asteroid detection and tracking, the warning time before an asteroid impact with the Earth can be very short. All of the non-nuclear techniques, including hypervelocity kinetic impactors and slow-pull GTs, require mission lead times much longer than 10 years, even for a relatively small NEO. However, the most probable mission scenarios will have a warning time much shorter than 10 years, so the use of higher-energy nuclear explosives in space will become inevitable. Staging direct intercept missions with a short warning time will result in arrival velocities of 10–30 km/s with respect to target asteroids. A rendezvous mission to a target asteroid, requiring an extremely large arrival ΔV of 10–30 km/s, is totally impractical.

Although a less destructive standoff nuclear explosion can be employed for deflection missions, the momentum/energy transfer created by a shallow subsurface nuclear explosion is at least 100 times larger than that of an optimal standoff nuclear explosion. However, state-of-the-art nuclear subsurface penetrator technology limits the impact velocity to less than about 300 m/s because higher impact velocities prematurely destroy the penetrating fusing mechanisms. An impact speed limit of 1.5 km/s has been cited for nuclear Earth-penetrator weapons (EPWs) in [7]. Neither a precision standoff explosion at an optimal height of burst (HOB) near an irregularly shaped, smaller NEO, with intercept velocities as high as 30 km/s, nor a contact burst is a trivial engineering task.

Consequently, a hypervelocity nuclear interceptor (HNI) system concept is proposed in this paper, which will enable a last-minute, nuclear disruption mission with intercept velocities as high as 30 km/s. The proposed system employs a two-body space vehicle consisting of a fore body (leader) and an aft body (follower), as illustrated in Fig. 1. The leader spacecraft provides proper kinetic-impact crater conditions for the follower spacecraft carrying nuclear explosive devices (NEDs) to make a robust and effective explosion below the surface of a target asteroid body. Surface contact burst or standoff explosion missions may not require such a two-body vehicle configuration. However, for a precision standoff explosion at an optimal HOB, accurate timing of the nuclear explosive detonation will be required during the terminal phase of hypervelocity intercept missions. Robust nuclear disruption strategies and technologies, to be employed in a last-minute, direct intercept mission, should be further studied, developed, and flight tested/validated.

Section snippets

Non-nuclear options

The physical principles behind, as well as some practical limitations of, non-nuclear options, such as gravity tractors and kinetic impactors, will be briefly discussed in this section.

Nuclear options

In practice, deflection methods of sufficiently high-energy density are preferred and need to be prepared in advance of an expected impact date with the Earth. One of these methods utilizes a nuclear explosion at a specified standoff distance from the target NEO, to effect a velocity change by ablating and blowing off a thin layer of the surface. The basic physical fundamentals of such nuclear standoff explosions can be found in [8], [9], [10].

Nuclear standoff explosions are often assessed to

Hypervelocity nuclear interceptor (HNI) concept

In the mid-1990s, researchers at the Russian Federal Nuclear Center examined a conceptual configuration design of a rigidly connected, two-segment nuclear penetrator system as illustrated in Fig. 7 [11]. Because this configuration, even with a fore segment equipped with a shaped charge, limited the impact velocity to less than 1.5 km/s, researchers at the Central Institute of Physics and Technology in Moscow, Russia also conducted a preliminary simulation study of a concept for a high-speed

Parametric characterization of modeling uncertainties

Space missions to deflect or disrupt a hazardous NEO will require accurate prediction of its orbital trajectory, both before and after a deflection/disruption event. Understanding the inherent sensitivity of mission success to the uncertainties in the orbital elements and material properties of a target NEO will lead to a more robust mission design, in addition to identifying the required precision for observation, tracking, and characterization of a target NEO. The unique technical challenges

Conclusion

A concept of using a fore body (a leader spacecraft) to provide proper kinetic-energy impact crater conditions for an aft body (a follower spacecraft) carrying nuclear explosives has been proposed in this paper as a technically feasible option for the most probable impact threat of NEOs with a short warning time (e.g., much less than 10 years). The current and planned studies at the ADRC would enable an important step forward for this area of emerging international interest, by finding the most

Acknowledgment

This research has been supported by a grant from NASA's Iowa Space Grant Consortium. The author would like to thank Dr. David Dearborn at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for his technical advice and support in the area of nuclear fragmentation modeling and simulation. The proposed HNI system has been selected as an NIAC (NASA Innovative Advanced Concept) Phase 1 project by the NASA Office of the Chief Technologist. The author would like to thank Dr. John (Jay) Falker, the NIAC Program

References (22)

  • 〈http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp-letter-neo-senate.pdf〉, John Holdren, Director, the...
  • D. Dearborn, 21st Century Steam for Asteroid Mitigation, AIAA-2004-1413, 2004 Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting...
  • B. Dachwald et al.

    Solar-Sail Kinetic Energy Impactor Trajectory Optimization for an Asteroid Deflection Mission

    J. Spacecraft Rockets

    (2007)
  • E. Lu et al.

    Gravitational Tractor for Towing Asteroids

    Nature

    (2005)
  • B. Wie

    Dynamics and Control of Gravity Tractor Spacecraft for Asteroid Deflection

    J. Guid. Control Dynam.

    (2008)
  • Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies, National Research Council, National...
  • Effects of Nuclear Earth-Penetrator and Other Weapons, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences,...
  • B. Kaplinger, B. Wie, J. Basart, Analysis of nuclear standoff explosions for deflecting near-Earth objects, Proceedings...
  • V.V. Rodionov, et al., Nuclear Means for Affecting Near-Earth Objects, Russia, 1997....
  • Cited by (44)

    • Kinetic impactor for a short warning asteroid deflection

      2023, Acta Astronautica
      Citation Excerpt :

      The gravity tractor is limited to asteroids with a warning time of dozens of years. In what respects to the nuclear standoff, as stated in [9] their practical applicability is still to be demonstrated. Moreover, a nuclear approach would imply several risks that could be avoided.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text