Skip to main content
Log in

Superhydrophobicity of bionic alumina surfaces fabricated by hard anodizing

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bionic alumina samples were fabricated on convex dome type aluminum alloy substrate using hard anodizing technique. The convex domes on the bionic sample were fabricated by compression molding under a compressive stress of 92.5 MPa. The water contact angles of the as-anodized bionic samples were measured using a contact angle meter (JC2000A) with the 3 μL water drop at room temperature. The measurement of the wetting property showed that the water contact angle of the unmodified as-anodized bionic alumina samples increases from 90° to 137° with the anodizing time. The increase in water contract angle with anodizing time arises from the gradual formation of hierarchical structure or composite structure. The structure is composed of the micro-scaled alumina columns and pores. The height of columns and the depth of pores depend on the anodizing time. The water contact angle increases significantly from 96° to 152° when the samples were modified with self-assembled monolayer of octadecanethiol (ODT), showing a change in the wettability from hydrophobicity to super-hydrophobicity. This improvement in the wetting property is attributed to the decrease in the surface energy caused by the chemical modification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong Y C, Uhm H S. Superhydrophobicity of a material made from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 88, 244101–244101–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang C, Tartaglino U, Persson B N J. Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 97, 116103–116103–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang K J, Wang X F, Yan W F, Yu J H, Xu R R. Fabrication of superhydrophilic Cu2O and CuO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 286, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu X L, Jiang Z H, Li J, Zhang Z H, Ren L Q. Super-hydrophobic property of nano-sized cupric oxide films. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2010, 204, 3200–3204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erbil H Y, Demirel A L, Avci Y, Mert O. Transformation of a simple plastic into a superhydrophobic surface. Science, 2003, 299, 1377–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou Y, Song X M, Yu M N, Wang B, Yan H. Superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by plasma fluorination of lotus-leaf-like amorphous carbon films. Surface Review and Letters, 2006, 13, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng Y T, Rodak D E. Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic? Applied physical letters, 2005, 86, 144101–144101–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao X F, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature, 2004, 432, 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun T L, Feng L, Gao X F, Jiang L. Bio-inspired surfaces with special wettability. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2005, 38, 644–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Z G, Zhou F, Hao J C, Liu W M. Effects of system parameters on making aluminum alloy lotus. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 303, 298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo Z G, Liu W M. Progress in bio-mimicing of super-hydrophobic surface. Progress in Chemistry, 2006, 18, 721–726.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Z G, Zhou F, Hao J C, Liang Y M, Liu W M, Huck W T S. Stick and slide ferrofluidic droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Applied Physical Letters, 2006, 89, 081911–081911–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung Y C, Bhushan B. Contact angle, adhesion and friction properties of micro- and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17, 4970–4980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roach P, Shirtcliffe N J, Newton M I. Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter, 2008, 4, 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y H, Wang W, Zhong L, Wang J, Jiang Q L, Guo X Y. Super-hydrophobic surface on pure magnesium substrate by wet chemical method. Applied Surface Science, 2010, 256, 3837–3840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu J H, Li M, Zhao Y, Lu Q H. Control over the hydrophobic behavior of polystyrene surface by annealing temperature based on capillary template wetting method. Colloids and surface A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 302, 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shirtcliffe N J, McHale G, Newton M I, Perry C C. Wetting and wetting transitions on copper-based super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2005, 21, 937–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patermarakls G, Moussoutzanis K. Electrochemical kinetic study on the growth of porous anodic oxide films on aluminium. Electrochemical Acta, 1995, 40, 699–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vorobyova A I, Outkina E A. Study of pillar microstructure formation with anodic oxides. Thin Solid Films, 1998, 324, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yakovleva N M, Anicai L, Yakovlev A N, Dima L, Khanina Y E, Buda M, Chupakhina E A. Structure study of anodic films formed on aluminum alloyin nitric acid electrolyte. Thin Solid Films, 2002, 416, 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luquan Ren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Du, F., Liu, X. et al. Superhydrophobicity of bionic alumina surfaces fabricated by hard anodizing. J Bionic Eng 8, 369–374 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60042-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60042-5

Keywords

Navigation