Skip to main content
Log in

A flexible hingeless control surface inspired by aquatic animals

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A flexible hingeless control surface model was proposed for motion control of Underwater Vehicles (UVs), which is inspired by the flexible bending control surfaces of underwater creatures, such as fish and squid. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation demonstrates that, in comparison with the hinged or rigid control surface, the proposed flexible bending control surface can suppress the flow separation so as to improve the turning performance. A prototype of the flexible control surface was fabricated, in which Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) wires were selected as the actuators. The elastic energy storage and exchange mechanism was incorporated into the actuation of the control surface to improve the efficiency. Thermal analysis of SMA wires was performed to find proper actuating condition. Open-loop bending experiments were carried out. The results show that the proposed control surface can achieve the maximum bending angle of 104°. Moreover, the power and energy consumption under different pulse conditions were compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker J A. Kinematics and performance of maneuvering control surfaces in teleost fishes. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2004, 29, 572–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker J A. Does a rigid body limit maneuverability? The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203, 3391–3396.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fish F E, Nicastro A J. Aquatic turning performance by the whirligig beetle: Constraints on maneuverability by a rigid biological system. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 1649–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fish F E. Biological designs for enhanced maneuverability: Analysis of marine mammal performance. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology: Special Session on Bio-Engineering Research Related to Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, New Hampshire, 1997, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fish F E. Performance constraints on the maneuverability of flexible and rigid biological systems. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, Durham, New Hampshire, 1999, 394–406.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan W L, Kang T, Lee Y J. Experimental characterization of ostraciiform swimming with rigid caudal fins. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Bangkok, Thailand, 2008, 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu Y, Zong G, Bi S, Gao J. Initial Development of a Flapping Propelled Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV). Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Sanya, China, 2007, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandyopadhyay P R, Castano J M, Rice J Q, Philips R B, Nedderman W H. Low-speed maneuvering hydrodynamics of fish and small underwater vehicles. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1997, 119, 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagoudas D C, Strelecz J K, Yen J, Kham M A. Intelligent design optimization of a shape memory alloy actuated reconfigurable wing. Proceedings of SPIE, 2000, 3984, 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kudva J N, Sanders B, Pinkerton-Florance J, Garcia E. The DARPA/AFRL/NASA smart wing program: Final overview. Proceedings of SPIE, 2002, 4698, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukuda T, Kawamoto A, Arai F, Matsuura H. Steering mechanism of underwater micro mobile robot. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, 1995, 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ayers J, Wilbur C, Olcott C. Lamprey robots. Proceedings of International Symposium on Aqua Biomechanisms, Hiratsuka, Japan, 2000, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suleman A, Crawford C. Design and testing of a biomimetic tuna using shape memory alloy induced propulsion. Computers and Structures, 2008, 86, 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomie M, Takiguchi A, Honda T, Yamasaki J. Turning performance of fish-type microrobot driven by external magnetic field. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2005, 41, 4015–4017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Z G, Yamashita N, Gondo M, Yamamoto A, Higuchi T. Electrostatically actuated robotic fish: Design and control for high-mobility open-loop swimming. IEEE transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan X, Kim D, Usher N, Laboy D, Jackson J, Kapetanovic A, Rapai J, Sabadus B, Zhou X. An autonomous robotic fish for mobile sensing. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, 2006, 5424–5429.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen T D, Carpenter B F, Hall J. Flexible tab-assisted control concept (FlexTAC). Proceedings of SPIE, 2001, 4332, 364–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quackenbusha T R, Batcho P F, Bilanin A J, Carpenter B F. Design, fabrication, and test planning for an SMA-actuated vortex wake control system. Proceedings of SPIE, 1998, 3326, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rediniotis O K, Lagoudas D C, Garner L J, Wilson L N. Development of a Spined Underwater Biomimetic Vehicle With SMA Actuators. Proceedings of SPIE, 1999, 3668, 642–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartol I K, Patterson M R, Mann R. Swimming mechanics and behavior of the shallow-water brief squid Lolliguncula brevis. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norberg U M, Rayner J M V. Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): Wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences, 1987, 316, 335–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Balta J A, Bosia F, Michaud V, Dunkel G, Botsis J, Manson J A. Smart composites with embedded shape memory alloy actuators and fibre bragg grating sensors: activation and control. Smart Materials and Structures, 2005, 14, 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Furukawa Techno Material. Shape Memory Alloys & Super-Elastic Alloys, [2009-09-22], http://www.fitec.co.jp/ftm/english/nt-e/product.htm

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ikuta, K. Micro/miniature shape memory alloy actuator. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1990, 2156–2161.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei Z, Sandstrorom R, Miyazaki S. Shape-memory materials and hybrid composites for smart systems Part I Shape-memory materials. Journal of Materials Science, 1998, 33, 3743–3762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Li, J., Hang, G. et al. A flexible hingeless control surface inspired by aquatic animals. J Bionic Eng 7, 364–374 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(10)60268-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(10)60268-5

Keywords

Navigation