Skip to main content
Log in

Microscopic Response of TRIP Steels to Prestrain During Plastic Deformation

  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to uncover the mechanism of elasticmodulus degradation during plastic deformation, uniaxial tensile test of transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steels under different prestrain levels was carried out. The real elastic modulus unloaded at each prestrain was calculated by linearly fiting. The microstructure evolution with plastic strain and the fracture morphology were monitored by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Dislocation density and its distribution were detected under a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Microscopic mechanism of the elastic modulus degradation of TRIP steels was discussed in detail. Experimental results indicated that the investigated TRIP600 steel was of severe elastic modulus degradation during plastic deformation. The new-born martensite distributed among the retained austenite, resulting in the combination of good ductility and high strength for TRIP steels. It was the change of dislocation movement that induced the variation of atomic binding force and finaly led to the variation of elastic modulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi K K, Soulami A, Liu W W, et al. Influence of Various Material Design Parameters on Deformation Behaviors of TRIP Steels [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2010, 50(2): 720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. HOU Xiao-ying, XU Yun-bo, ZHAO Yan-feng, et al. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot Roled Low Silicon TRIP Steel Containing Phosphorus and Vanadium [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 2011, 18(11): 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Safaei M, De Waele W, Hertschap K. Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Material Anisotropy on the Springback of Advanced High Strength Steel [C] // International Conference on Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies (AMPT2010). Paris: Yvan Chastel, 2011: 371.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li Hongzhou, Sun Guangyong, Li Guangyao, et al. On Twist Springback in Advanced HighStrength Steels [J]. Materials and Design, 2011, 32(6): 3272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ledbeter H H, Kim S A. Low Temperature Elastic Constants of Deformed Polycrystaline Copper [J]. Mater Sci Eng, 1988, 101A: 87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cleveland R R, Ghosh A K. Inelastic Effects on Springback in Metals [J]. Inter J Plasticity, 2002, 18(5/6): 769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo Limin, Ghosh Amit K. Elastic and Inelastic Recovery After Plastic Deformation of DQSK Steel Sheet [J]. J Eng Mater Technol, 2003, 125(3): 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morestin F, Boivin M. On the Necessity of Taking Into Account the Variation in the Young Modulus With Plastic Strain in Elastic-Plastic Software [J]. Nucl Eng Des, 1996, 162(1): 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshida F, Uemori T, Fujiwara K. Elastic-Plastic Behavior of Steel Sheets Under In-Plane Cyclic Tension-Compression at Large Strain [J]. Inter J Plasticity, 2002, 18(5/6): 633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang M, Akiyama Y, Sasaki T. Microscopic Evaluation of Change in Springback Characteristics Due to Plastic Deformation [C] // Ghosh S, Castro J J, Lee J K Proceedings of the 8th Inter Forming Processes, NUMIFORM 2004. Columbus, Ohio: [s. n.], 2004: 881.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fei D D, Hodgson P. Experimental and Numerical Studies of Springback in Air V-Bending Process for Cold Roled TRIP Steels [J]. Nucl Eng Des, 2006, 236(18): 1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benito J A, Manero J J, Jorba J, et al. Change of Young’s Modulus of Cold-Deformed Pure Iron ina Tensile Test [J]. Metal Mater Trans, 2005, 36A(12): 3317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez R, Benito J J, Prado J M. Study of the Inelastic Response of TRIP Steels After Plastic Deformation [J]. ISIJ Inter, 2005, 45(12): 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun L, Wagoner R H. Complex Unloading Behavior: Nature of the Deformation and Its Consistent Constitutive Representation [J]. Inter J Plasticity, 2011, 27(7): 1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chati S, Hermi N. The Effect of Non-Linear Recovery on Springback Prediction [J]. Computers and Structures, 2011, 89(13/14): 1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marreta L, Di Lorenzo R. Influenceof Material Properties Variability on Springback and Thinning in Sheet Stamping Processes: A Stochastic Analysis [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2010, 51(1/2/3/4): 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. YU Hai Yan. Variation of Elastic Modulus During Plastic Deformation and Its Influence on Springback [J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30(3): 846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeshi Iwamoto, Toshio Tsuta. Computational Simulation on Deformation Behavior of CT Specimens of TRIP Steel Under Mode I Loading for Evaluation of Fracture Toughness [J]. Inter J Plasticity, 2002, 18(11): 1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-yan Yu.

Additional information

Foundation Item: Item Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175382); Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China (2011)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Hy. Microscopic Response of TRIP Steels to Prestrain During Plastic Deformation. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 20, 80–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(13)60160-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(13)60160-0

Keywords

Navigation