Dynamic reliability under random shocks

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00057-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The theory of dynamic reliability is extended to explicitly incorporate random changes of the state variables at the time points of transition between the discrete states of the Markovian component of the model. It is shown, that this can be used to model random loads induced by external events, a situation often encountered in structural reliability problems. A state model is developed, which represents the behavior of elementary structures degrading, due to aging processes and stochastic environmental loads. Finally, the structural reliability of the basic components of underground water pipe networks is estimated using the proposed framework.

Introduction

Traditionally, state graph processes are formulated in terms of state probabilities. This means, a system of equations is derived, which can be used to calculate state probabilities. Solving this system means solving the process. This also holds for dynamic reliability, where the state probabilities pj(x,t) are given bypj(x,t)=(u)pj(u,0)δ(xgj(t,u))exp0tλj(gj(s,u))dsdu+(i)0t(u)δ(xgj(t−τ,u))λij(u)exp0t−τλj(gj(s,u))dspi(u,τ)duwhere x is a vector of physical state variables, which describe the physical state of the system. The evolution of x over time can be expressed for a given state and initial conditions u by the vector function gj(t,u). Markovian transitions between the elements of a discrete state space are described by transition rates λij, which in turn may depend on x. The sum of all transition rates leaving a certain state j is called λj. This equation is derived in Ref. [7] and further analyzed in [8], [9], [10]. A more practical application is given in Ref. [17].

A system fails when either its physical variables enter a failure domain or the system reaches a failure state [15]. Let SjF be the failure region of state j and λj(x)=0 for x∈SjF. If we assume the dynamics vanish in SjF then failure probability R̄(t) is given by:R̄(t)=0t(x)j∈Xpj(x,t′)i∈Yλji(x)+δ(t′−t)HjF(x)dxdt′where X is the set of working states and Y the set of failed states. HjF(x) is the indicator function of failure domain, defined by:HjF(x)=1ifx∈SjF0elseThe second way leading to a failure, i.e. an entering into the failure region SjF, has no correspondent in classical reliability. It has to be noticed that on the contrary, crossing the border of the failure region is usually the only way of failure in structural reliability problems. Eliminating failed states simplifies Eq. (2) to:R̄(t)=(x)j=1Npj(x,t)HjF(x)dxwhere N is the number of states.

What happens, if a dynamic system experiences external loads? Although the theory of dynamic reliability is one of the most general approaches towards system reliability nowadays available, a small extension appears necessary to enable it to cover such situations. The reason is that the theory of dynamic reliability allows for the following:

  • (Random changes between discrete system states at random time points.

  • Deterministic changes in the physical variables of the system during the times in between.

An earthquake, however, may impose random changes on physical parameters of the system. This may be an impact on a physical variable in a narrow sense, like a sudden change in velocity of a movable mass due to acceleration, or it may be a change in a parameter, which is normally treated as a constant value, like an elasticity module, which changes due to plastic deformation. All such changes are immediate random changes of a continuous variable and depend, in general, from the intensity of the load. For an adequate modeling, an extension is suggested allowing for random changes of the physical variables during transitions between discrete states.

In the following, first, a formulation of dynamic reliability using frequency densities and the proposed extension are presented. Next, is presented a state model for the estimation of structural reliability. This framework is sufficient to handle a wide range of structural reliability problems. Finally, two specific problems are examined. The first is a simple example treated analytically, while the second is a realistic problem of structural reliability, solved with Monte-Carlo techniques under the proposed methodology.

Section snippets

Formulation of dynamic reliability using frequency densities

Probably, frequency densities in the field of reliability engineering has been first introduced in Ref. [20], who used frequency densities of basic events to find the failure frequency of a fault tree. This work has been extended in Ref. [1] to cover non-coherent structures. Other relevant work appears in Ref. [2], where frequency densities are used in state graph models, in [14], [4], where frequency densities are used in the context of dynamic reliability and in Ref. [11], who uses frequency

A state model for structural reliability

In almost every state model developed in dynamic reliability problems up to now, the state of the system is determined by the couple (x,i), where x is a vector of physical state variables and i is an integer labeling a Markovian state defined by the status (i.e. intact, failed, etc.) of all relevant components of the system.

The situation is quite different in the analysis of structures [13]. Structural reliability deals usually with structures which either do not consist of any partial

A two states example

Let us consider a simple example, which already leads to non-elementary results. Assume we have a simple system with a scalar physical variable x which represents the structure's strength. The system suffers from a single shock having an occurrence rate λ while the intensity of the shock z is described by the density function:f(z)=1z2,z∈[1,+∞)The shock effect function is given by:y=xza decreasing function of z, resulting to the reduction of the structure's strength after each shock.

The state

The case of underground water pipe network

In this section is presented the solution of the structural reliability problem for underground water networks. The problem was treated using the proposed framework and solved by means of Monte-Carlo process simulation [16], [21].

Summary and conclusions

Dynamic reliability is one of the most general concepts to model safety and reliability tasks. Starting from a very practical problem, i.e. to model the influence of random shocks on a structure consisting of buried pipe lines, a theoretical extension of the classical framework turned out to be necessary. This extension implies to account for random shocks at the times of transitions between the discrete states of the underlying Markov process. An according change has been implemented in the

Acknowledgements

Parts of this work were performed under contract EVG1-CT-1999-00005 funded by the European Commission and under grant BE1536/2-2 funded by DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). The authors also acknowledge the work of the referees, which significantly improved the quality of the paper.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • A Markov regenerative process model for phased mission systems under internal degradation and external shocks

    2021, Reliability Engineering and System Safety
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among six communication satellites (three DFH-2 and three DFH-2A) launching by China [28], the failure of electronics caused by the space environment is dominated in their total failures, which takes more than 56.7%. The random shock effect in reliability analysis has been widely studied in the last few decades [29]. There are four kinds of shock models in existing research: (1) Cumulative random shocks model [30]; (2) Extreme random shocks model [31]; (3) Continuous damage model [32]; (4) Delta-shocks model [33].

  • Reliability analysis of periodically inspected systems with competing risks under Markovian environments

    2021, Computers and Industrial Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Reliability models of systems with multiple failure modes have been drawing increasing attention with the increasing complexity of system configuration and the deepening understanding of system failure mechanism (see, for example, Becker, Camarinopoulos, & Kabranis, 2002; Cha, Lee, & Mi, 2004; Levitin, Zhang, & Xie, 2006; Zheng, Zhou, Zheng, & Wu, 2016; Liu, Xie, Xu, & Kuo, 2016; Qiu, Cui, & Gao, 2017).

  • Dynamic importance measure for the K-out-of-n: G system under repeated random load

    2020, Reliability Engineering and System Safety
    Citation Excerpt :

    The different levels of stress on the system at different mission phases can also be considered as a repeated random load on the system. Further, if the loading process is time-related, the reliability or failure probability is usually expressed as a function of time and time-variant reliability is highly valued in academia and engineering [38–41]. The component importance and the importance ranking may change during the long-term loading process.

  • Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks

    2018, Reliability Engineering and System Safety
    Citation Excerpt :

    If these random shocks are not considered, the reliability of the PMS will be overestimated. Random shocks have been considered with different approaches in reliability modeling [14–24]. Lin and Zio [14] studied the components’ reliability considering both degradation processes and random shocks.

  • Creep influence on structural dynamic reliability

    2015, Engineering Structures
    Citation Excerpt :

    As an external disturbance to structures, earthquake is featured not only by obvious dynamic nature but also strong randomness [11], which determines that random vibration analysis [12,13] and the measure of dynamic reliability [14] play an increasingly important role in modern engineering. The investigations about probabilistic seismic performance and dynamic reliability estimation, paying special attention to damaged structures [15] and stochastic structures [16,17], have been conducted for bridges [18–21], frames [22–24], offshore structures [25], underground structures [26] and towers [27] under stationary or non-stationary random excitations in recent years, with a great effort for the computational efficiency [28–30]. Nevertheless, even allowing for such various engineering applications, it would appear that so far no dynamic reliability analysis has taken note of the realistic long-term effect occurring anterior to the random excitations, in spite that concrete is aging viscoelastic in nature and the time-dependent property exerts a considerable influence on structural behaviours in practice as stated above.

  • A methodology for probabilistic model-based prognosis

    2013, European Journal of Operational Research
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text