Formulation and in vivo evaluation of ocular insert containing phenylephrine and tropicamide

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00072-1Get rights and content

Abstract

A Gelfoam® based ocular device containing 1.7 mg of phenylephrine and 0.6 mg of tropicamide was formulated and evaluated for pupillary dilation in rabbits. The manufacturing procedure is fairly simple and the required excipients are inexpensive. The in vivo results show that the mydriatic response produced by the proposed device is larger and longer lasting than that produced by eyedrops with an equivalent amount of phenylephrine and tropicamide. The results reported in this study, along with those of previous studies, imply that Gelfoam® is a versatile drug carrier for either local or systemic drug delivery via the ophthalmic route.

Introduction

A fully dilated pupil is an important factor which allows for optimal ophthalmic examination of the fundus for disease as well as many ocular surgical procedures (Kergoat et al., 1989, Ho et al., 1992, Paggiarino et al., 1993, Zeise et al., 1996). Ocular instillation of pupil-dilating agent(s) is commonly used to produce mydriasis (Ho et al., 1992). An ideally dilated pupil should be large and stable to the intensive light stimulation encountered during ophthalmoscopic examination (Kergoat et al., 1989, Ho et al., 1992). The co-administration of phenylephrine hydrochloride and tropicamide solutions into the eye has been shown to be an effective combination in producing reliable mydriasis (Apt and Henrick, 1980, Levine, 1982, Kergoat et al., 1989, Ho et al., 1992, Paggiarino et al., 1993, Zeise et al., 1996). Although the co-use of these drugs in eyedrops can produce mydriasis, it has a low local bioavailability due to rapid clearance from the ocular surface by the lachrymal system and requires a high frequency of drug instillation to produce satisfactory results (Durrani et al., 1996).

To produce an adequate pupil size, a patient will receive a total of 4–30 drops of tropicamide (1%) and phenylephrine (10%) solution (Brown and Hanna, 1978). This regimen is inconvenient for both physician and patient. Due to the limited volume that the conjunctival sac can hold, most of the eyedrop solution is either blinked out or drained into the nasal cavity allowing only a small portion of the drugs to reach their site of action. The drainage of both phenylephrine and tropicamide into the nasal mucosa could result in systemic absorption of these two agents and produce many unwanted systemic side effects including tachycardia, hypertension, and headache (Rengstorff and Doughty, 1982). In addition, it is well known that both phenylephrine and tropicamide solutions irritate the eye (Zeise et al., 1996).

Since the contact time is considered the most important factor in ophthalmic drug delivery, many attempts to improve efficacy have focused on prolonging the contact time of the drugs with the anterior surface of eye (Harris and Robinson, 1990, Maitani et al., 1997). Phenylephrine and tropicamide have each been formulated as a viscous solution (Saettone et al., 1984), a rod (Alani, 1978), a gel (Durrani et al., 1996), an oinment (Hendrickson and Hanna, 1977, Saettone et al., 1980) or a polyvinyl alcohol flag (O’Donnell and Gillibrand, 1995). Also, microdrop and dilute solution administration have been investigated for these drugs (Brown and Hanna, 1978, Forman, 1980, Gray et al., 1992, Elibol et al., 1997). The latter regimens are designed to slow the drainage by the lacrymal system and to reduce ocular irritation. Although the strategies described above are reasonable they are not routinely used. A need exists for a formulation of dilation agent(s) that can be administered easily in a single dose with reliable, rapid results and minimal risk of adverse effect to the patient.

Previously, a gelatin based ocular device was introduced by this laboratory for the systemic delivery of peptides such as melanotan II (Pinsuwan et al., 1997) and insulin (Simamora et al., 1996, Lee et al., 1997a, Lee et al., 1997b), as well as for the local delivery of pilocarpine (Simamora et al., 1998). In vivo data from rabbits show that melanotan II has a 67% bioavailability if it is delivered by this device and a 25% bioavailability if it is delivered by eyedrop. The therapeutic efficacy of either insulin or pilocarpine was substantially improved with the device, and the duration of activity of these two drugs was also prolonged up to 10 and 8 h, respectively. Recently, the release rate of a wide variety of chemicals from Gelfoam® has been well documented by Hamalainen et al. (1998). In this study Gelfoam® is utilized as a local drug carrier, for both phenylephrine and tropicamide. Measurement of the change in pupil diameter and area were used to assess the efficacy of the proposed device.

Section snippets

Materials

Gelfoam® (absorbable gelatin sponge, USP, size 100) was generously provided by Pharmacia and Upjohn (Kalamazoo, MI). Phenylephrine–HCl and tropicamide were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Mydfrin® (phenylephrine.HCl, 2.5%) and Mydriacyl® (tropicamide, 1%) were purchased from Alcon (Humacao, PR). All other solvents and chemicals were of reagent or HPLC grade and were used as received from commercial suppliers.

Eye device fabrication

A Gelfoam disc of ≈4 mm diameter and 0.5 mm thickness was punched from a slab of

Results

Fig. 1 displays the pupil size of the control eye (×) and eyes treated with drug-loaded eyedrops (○), drug-loaded devices (•), and placebo devices (□) over 4 h. This time period is sufficient for a routine eye examination as well as for cataract surgery. It can be seen from the figure that the instillation of placebo devices produces no pupil dilation. This agrees with previous studies (Simamora et al., 1996, Lee et al., 1997a, Lee et al., 1997b, Simamora et al., 1998) which demonstrated that

Discussion

The mydriatic response produced by the eyedrops is consistent with a previous report (Levine, 1982) demonstrating that the time to reach the steady state pupil diameter is 30 min after instillation. The proposed eye device gives a similar time to steady state, suggesting that the dissolution of phenylephrine and tropicamide from the device is rapid.

Since the purpose of giving pupil-dilating agents is to allow the visualization of the ocular fundus, the total pupillary viewable area is an

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pharmacia and Upjohn, (Kalamazoo, MI) for providing samples of Gelfoam® sponge.

References (27)

Cited by (36)

  • Topical drug delivery devices: A review

    2018, Experimental Eye Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Gelfoam® discs are made of resorbable gelatin and impregnated with insulin for diabetic patients or mydriatic drugs to widen the pupil. The Gelfoam® discs should be placed in the lower conjunctival fornix and have been tested extensively in rabbits and human volunteers (Lee et al., 1999, 2002, 1997; Negvesky et al., 2000). Some volunteers (6/20) developed a palpebral conjunctival infection (hyperemia), while other volunteers (3/20) developed superficial punctate erosion (Negvesky et al., 2000).

  • On the importance of Bloom number of gelatin to the development of biodegradable in situ gelling copolymers for intracameral drug delivery

    2016, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, hydrocortisone-incorporated gelatin (type A 175 Bloom and type B 225 Bloom) nanoparticles showed zero-ordered release kinetics up to 3 h suitable for topical ophthalmic use (Vandervoort and Ludwig, 2004). Others have loaded phenylephrine and tropicamide in gelatin foams as ocular inserts to study the response in pupil diameter, and results suggested that gelatin inserts sustained the release of drugs better than conventional eye drops (Lee et al., 1999). These examples clearly demonstrated the ocular biocompatibility of gelatin carriers while the release of drug was mediated through Bloom index of gelatin-based biomaterials.

  • Novel in situ gelling ocular films for the opioid growth factor-receptor antagonist-naltrexone hydrochloride: Fabrication, mechanical properties, mucoadhesion, tolerability and stability studies

    2014, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The average weights of the prepared film ranged from 3.5 ± 0.8 mg to 8.0 ± 1 mg. These properties are likely to impart good ocular tolerability to the prepared in situ gelling films and thereby to minimise the foreign body sensation that is commonly experienced with the standard ocular insert (pilocarpine ocular inserts, commercially known as Ocusert Pilo-20 and Pilo-40) as a result of their relatively larger dimensions and non-biodegradability (Lee et al., 1999; Kumar et al., 2012). Surface pH measurements were in the range of 7–7.5 indicating that the surface pH of the prepared inserts is compatible with the physiological pH of the surface of the eye, this minimises any possible disturbance of the pre-corneal tear film which, in turn could cause ocular surface irritation, tearing and reflex blinking.

  • Towards the use of hydrogels in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency

    2013, Drug Discovery Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    This eye medical device was reported to prolong the activity of the insulin through gradual release aided by the slow and constant tear production from the lachrymal system [73]. Another study showed that dilation of the pupil induced by phenylephrine and tropicamide delivered using Gelfoam® was greater and longer lasting than that produced by eyedrops with an equivalent amount of these drugs [74]. As Gelfoam® can be worn with contact lenses, in a hydrated form; this hydrogel as well as other gelatin hydrogels may serve as a growth factor and/or drug-release feeder device to maintain LEC delivered to the ocular surface using silicone lenses.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text