Elsevier

Physics Reports

Volume 307, Issues 1–4, 1 December 1998, Pages 197-200
Physics Reports

Dark matter from particle physics

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00043-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Eventually, the properties of particles relevant to the possible amounts of dark matter from various particle physics sources (lightest superpartner (LSP), massive neutrinos, axions, etc.) will be well determined. I discuss how well ΩLSPh2 can be calculated once there is collider data on the properties of the LSP. Study of the supersymmetry Lagrangian implies that current limits on WIMPs are not general.

Introduction

By the early 1980s particle physics had proposed three main candidates for non-baryonic dark matter, massive neutrinos, axions, and the supersymmetry LSP. All of them automatically give interesting Ωh2∼0.1 for reasonable values of the relevant parameters. Once the neutrino and axion masses are measured their contribution to Ωh2 can be calculated. The main purpose of this talk is to discuss how well that can be done for the LSP [1].

It should be noted that from the point of view of particle theory all these candidates are natural, and occur together in a typical theory. Unified theories (with or without a GUT gauge group) typically have a stable LSP and massive neutrinos – it would require explanation if they did not. If there are any broken global symmetries they are likely to have an axion. In principle, the ratios of ΩLSP, Ωv, Ωa, Ωbaryon are calculable from the particle physics, although we do not yet understand such theories well enough to do so at present.

In this talk I will focus on calculating ΩLSP once there is collider data on its properties. First, it should be emphasized that detection of an LSP escaping a detector will imply that it has a lifetime about 1015 times longer than other sparticles, consistent with being stable, but not demonstrating that. It will be necessary to observe LSP scattering or annihilation to prove it is indeed a significant part of the CDM.

Once MLSP and its couplings to other particles are known, ΩLSP can be calculated. The calculation gives a density so it is actually Ωh2 that results, but by then h2 should be well enough known so it is not a large source of error. Then two main possible sources of error remain, the cosmology, and how well the needed parameters can be measured at colliders.

Section snippets

Cosmological uncertainties

The standard [2]calculations require solving the Boltzmann equation to obtain the relic density. Although this is usually treated with approximations, it can be done numerically to any desired accuracy, so no obstacle to accurate determination of ΩLSP arises there.

One normally assumes a standard cosmology, with homogeneity, etc. [2]. If these assumptions are modified the relic density could change, so a relic density calculation under the assumption of a standard cosmology will be subject to an

Particle physics uncertainties

Here there are two major possible sources of uncertainty. The annihilation calculation will depend on several parameters, such as MLSP, tanβ, the LSP wave function, and masses of other sparticles that occur in annihilation diagrams. Measurement errors in these parameters will propagate through the calculation and increase the uncertainty in the answer. Second, the correct theory may not be just the MSSM (which we define as the SM particles+their superpartners, the SM gauge group, two Higgs

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to M. Brhlik for discussions and a fruitful collaboration, and to J. Wells for discussions and suggestions. This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy.

References (4)

  • T. Falk et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1996)
  • M. Brhlik, G.L. Kane, in...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

View full text