Elsevier

Computers & Education

Volume 40, Issue 2, February 2003, Pages 183-191
Computers & Education

A comparison of student outcomes with and without teacher facilitated computer-based instruction

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00120-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The SuccessMaker computer-based instructional package can be used to improve the academic outcomes of disruptive students when intervention is teacher facilitated. Over a 2-year period, 215 participants identified as disruptive student were involved in a naturalistic quasi-experimental design in which independent sample t-tests were employed to determined differences between comparisons (Group I) and interventions (Group II) on psychosocial and academic measures. A significant difference (P<0.05) was found between Group I and Group II on locus of control and grade point average at the end of the first grading period subsequent to the intervention. The difference in grade point averages was suspected to be attributed to the average amount of time spent on two curriculum areas, math and science, within the 14 academic areas that comprise the SuccessMaker computerized program. Evidence from this study provides hope that teacher facilitation with computer-based instruction (CBI) may be the key to improving locus of control and grade point averages of disruptive students.

Section snippets

Student academic outcomes and teacher facilitation

Educating disruptive students is a social concern that has grown immensely in both scope and depth in the past decade. The educational dilemma of providing safe schools while fostering appropriate learning environments for all students has prompted communities to create alternative forms of education for students whose behaviors interfere with learning. One such intervention has been the establishment of alternative educational programs for disruptive students, already at-risk for academic

Student participants

Student participants for the two school years (1994–1995 and 1995–1996) who were assigned to the AEP for disciplinary reasons had several characteristics in common. Students were more likely to be male (80%) than female (20%); were African-American (85%) rather than Euro-American (14%); were 15 years or older (73%) and were classified as eighth (21%), nineth (45%), or tenth (19%) graders. In addition, family patterns were similar. Sixty-three percent of the legal guardians were grandmothers

Results

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the SuccessMaker Secondary/Adult Curriculum with teacher facilitation as measured by psychosocial functioning and academic performance. In an effort to determine the differences between Groups I and II, researchers conducted an independent sample t-test to compare the mean scores on the pretest outcome variables for Group I and Group II. Data in Table 2 indicated that the groups were similar or equivalent at the beginning of the study.

Discussion

Computer-based instruction appears to be a useful learning option for disruptive students. With teacher guidance, these students appear to take more responsibility for their learning. As a result, students experience academic gains that can be sustained for 180 days post assignment to AEP.

Regarding the psychosocial functioning variable, locus of control, there was a significant difference between Group I (17.0) and II (15.0 ) at exit. Group II entered the AEP with an internal locus of control

References (19)

  • C.C. Kulik et al.

    Effectiveness of computer-based instructionAn updated analysis

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (1991)
  • J.E.J. Woodrow

    Locus of control and student teacher computer attitudes

    Computers and Education

    (1990)
  • Aeby, V. G., Powell, J. V., & Carpenter-Aeby, T. (1999). Effects of successmaker computerized curriculum on the...
  • D.M. Brehm et al.

    Using graphing to teach subtraction

    The Computing Teacher

    (1994)
  • D.W. Brown et al.

    Young learner's reactions to problems solving contrasted by distinctly divergent computer interfaces

    Journal of Computing Childhood Education

    (1992)
  • Carpenter-Aeby, T. (1999). An evaluation of psychosocial and educational outcomes in an alternative educational...
  • T. Carpenter-Aeby et al.

    A process evaluation of school social work services in a disciplinary alternative educational program

    Children & Schools

    (2001)
  • The SuccessMaker secondary/adult package

    (1992)
  • D.L. Duke et al.

    Can alternative schools succeed where Benjamin Spock, Spiro Agnew, and B.F. Skinner have failed?

    Adolescence

    (1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • The digital explosion: It's impact on international student achievement

    2022, International Journal of Management Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    Consequently, the next stage of analysis involved conducting independent samples t-tests to compare mean coursework, examination and overall marks of two groups of students; those who used the interactive e-book versus those who did not. A method adopted in previous research exploring student outcomes under two different scenarios (Powell et al., 2003; Rivera & Rice, 2003). The analysis was performed for both modules and sought to identify significant differences in the marks between those students that chose to use the interactive e-book and those who did not.

  • The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment

    2011, Computers and Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    In both commercial and educational applications, characters have been integrated into the interface to take advantage of natural human social affordances (Cheng & Ye, 2010; Isbister & Nass, 2000). In a conventional setting, learning is not a solo activity occurring only inside one’s mind, but is largely influenced by social interactions with others (Lave & Wenger, 2001; Palinscar & Brown, 1984; Powell et al., 2003; Vygotsky et al., 1978; Wertsch et al., 1984). In computer-based learning, therefore, the presence of a PA that simulates social and natural context seems to better engage a learner in the learning task (Gulz, 2005; Kim, Wei, Xu, Ko, & Ilieva, 2007; Lester, Towns, Callaway, Voerman, & FitzGerald, 2000; Moreno, Mayer, Spires, & Lester, 2001).

  • A design to promote group learning in e-learning: Experiences from the field

    2008, Computers and Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, instructors of a web-based course should pay more attention to facilitate students in terms of promoting interaction and cooperation, and “warming up” the group climate for learning. ( Liaw & Huang, 2000; Powell, Aeby, & Aeby, 2003). In our study, system groups with on-line interaction monitoring are proven more effective than random groups in producing more rewarding and enjoyable learning experience for students on the WBI system.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text