Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 24, Issue 3, June 1999, Pages 157-168
Lung Cancer

Cadherin and catenin expression in normal human bronchial epithelium and non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00032-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Cadherins are transmembrane cell adhesion molecules (CAMS) that mediate cell–cell interactions and are important for maintenance of epithelial cell integrity. This function is dependent on an indirect interaction between the cytoplasmic domain of the cadherin molecule with three cytoplasmic proteins known as α-, β-, and γ-catenin (-cat). Growing evidence suggests that alterations in cadherin or catenin expression or function may be important to the development of an invasive or metastatic phenotype. Immunohistochemical techniques were used to study the expression of the two major epithelial cadherins, E-cadherin (E-cad) and P-cadherin (P-cad) as well as α- and γ-cat in normal bronchial epithelium and in a series of carefully TMN-staged pulmonary adenocarcinomas (n=21) and squamous cell carcinomas (n=7). The cadherin profile of normal pseudostratified bronchial epithelium was heterogeneous. Basilar cells strongly expressed P-cad, α- and γ-cat, while columnar cells moderately expressed E-cad, α- and γ-cat. In contrast to other epithelial tumors, E-cad on non-small cell lung carcinomas was actually upregulated, however, a decrease in P-cad expression was noted in 68%. At least one cadherin or catenin was downregulated, compared to normal bronchial epithelium, in 82% of tumors examined. With the exception of an association between loss of P-cad expression and poorly differentiated state, changes in cadherin and catenin expression levels were not significantly correlated to tumor stage, cell type, or nodal status. These findings illustrate that alteration of expression of cadherins and catenins are often found in non-small cell lung carcinoma when compared to the progenitor bronchial epithelium, and may play a role in the development of the malignant phenotype.

Introduction

Bronchogenic neoplasms are currently the most common cause of cancer mortality in the United States for both men and women, representing >170 000 deaths in yearly. Five-year survival rate with even local spread (hilar nodal disease—N1) is remarkably low, ∼30% at 5 years [1]. In addition, 30–40% of patients without evidence of nodal disease at resection (NO) eventually die from metastatic spread. It would thus be useful to have more reliable prognostic indicators at the time of tumor resection. In addition, a better understanding of changes in tumor cell biology that results in a more aggressive neoplastic phenotype may lead to the development of more effective therapeutic modalities.

Although the loss of cell–cell adhesion and invasion of carcinoma cells into the surrounding mesenchymal tissue has been associated with the malignant phenotype for more than 50 years, only recently have the molecular components responsible for these changes been identified. One important area of research has been the characterization of cell–cell and cell–substratum adhesion molecules. Alterations in immunoglobulin superfamily members and the cadherins have been noted in tumor progression [2]. The authors have previously examined the distribution of cell–substratum adhesion receptors (integrins) on non-small cell lung (NSCL) cancer tissues [3], [4]. Integrin expression was somewhat heterogeneous; however, the tumors tended to express fewer integrins than did normal bronchial tissue. These findings have been corroborated in a much larger study of over 60 tumors [5].

In this study, the authors examined a group of lung cancer specimens with regard to expression of important cell–cell adhesion molecules, namely the cadherins and the cadherin-associated proteins, the catenins. Cadherins are a class of calcium-dependent transmembrane cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that mediated cell–cell interactions via homophilic interactions and are important in the maintenance of epithelial cell integrity [6], [7]. This function is dependent on an indirect interaction between the cytoplasmic domain of the cadherin molecule with the cytoskeleton mediated via three cytoplasmic proteins known as α-, β-, and γ-catenin (-cat) [7], [8], [9] that form a complex with the cadherin molecule.

A growing body of evidence suggests that alternations of cadherin or catenin expression or function may be important to the development of an invasive or metastatic phenotype [10]. Work using cultured cells has shown that decreased E-cadherin (E-cad) expression correlated with tumor cell ‘invasiveness’ and that cell lines with little endogenous adhesive ability gained the adhesive (non-invasive) phenotype after transfection with exogenous E-cad cDNA [11], [12], [13], [14]. Although the correlation between loss of E-cad expression and invasive properties is well established in experimental systems, the relationship of E-cad expression in actual tumor specimens (as assessed by immunohistochemical techniques) with metastasis, cell dedifferentiation, and decreased survival rate is more complex and appears to be somewhat tumor-specific. For example, a clear inverse correlation between immunohistochemical expression of E-cad and tumor dedifferentiation and patient survival rates has been demonstrated in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck [15], [16], esophageal cancer [17], [18], prostate cancer [19], [20], and bladder tumors [21], [22]. In studies examining other tumor types such as colon, breast, and gastric carcinoma these correlations have been less definitive, with some studies indicating a clear link between loss of cadherin expression and malignant phenotype [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] and others not [28], [29], [30]. The expression of other cadherins, and of catenins, in cancer has been not well studied, however, preliminary data suggests that downregulation of P-cadherin (P-cad) and α-cat is associated with at least some malignancies [30], [31], [32], [33].

Very little is known about the expression of cadherins and catenins on normal or malignant bronchial epithelium, however, as discussed above, data from other types of tumor suggest that loss of cadherin and/or catenin expression might correlate with the degree of differentiation or propensity for lymph node metastasis and thus provide a useful marker for patients at high risk of metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the expression of these molecules in a large series of well-characterized lung carcinomas in which careful mediastinal lymph node staging had been performed. The authors have therefore used immunohistochemical techniques to identify the two major epithelial cadherins, E-cad and P-cad, as well as α- and γ-cat in normal bronchial epithelium and both pulmonary adenocarcinomas (n=21) and squamous cell carcinoma (n=7). This information was then correlated to the histologic type of tumor, the degree of differentiation, and the presence of lymph node metastasis.

Section snippets

Subjects and specimens

Twenty-eight fresh tumor specimens were obtained from patients undergoing pulmonary-resection for NSCLC at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. (Tissue procurement was approved by the Institutional Human Studies Committee of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine). The specimens were immediately embedded in Optimal Embedding Compound (OCT-Tissue Tek, Miles Diagnostics, Elkhart, IN), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70°C. Blocks were cut into 6-μm sections and

Cadherin and catenin expression on normal bronchial epithelium

Since non-small cell lung carcinoma presumably arises from bronchial epithelial precursors, the distribution of E- and P-cad, as well as α-, and γ-cat in normal human bronchial epithelium was first assessed.

In contrast to the strong and homogenous expression of E-cad in many epithelial tissues, such as skin (data not shown), stomach, esophagus, and breast [17], the expression of E-cad in normal bronchial epithelium was not prominent. As shown in Fig. 1A, staining of E-cad was rather weak,

Discussion

Although there have been some descriptions of E-cad expression in lung carcinomas [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] this study provides the first combined description of both E-cad and P-cad and of α-, β- and γ-cat in normal bronchial epithelium and in a panel of lung carcinomas. The results show that in contrast to many other epithelial-derived tumors, E-cad was not downregulated. In fact, in many of the specimens, E-cad expression was increased compared to the normal bronchial epithelium,

References (49)

  • K. Johnson et al.

    P- and E-cadherins are separate complexes in cells expression both cadherins

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1993)
  • A.P. Kowalczyk et al.

    Posttranslational regulation of plakoglobin expression: influence of the desmosomal cadherins on plakoglobin metabolic stability

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • W.D. Travis et al.

    Lung cancer

    Cancer

    (1995)
  • S.M. Albelda

    Biology of disease: role of integrins and other cell adhesion molecules in tumor progression and metastasis

    Lab. Invest.

    (1993)
  • L. Damjanovich et al.

    Distribution of integrin cell adhesion receptors in normal and malignant lung tissue

    Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol.

    (1992)
  • S.A. Mette et al.

    The distribution of integrin cell adhesion receptors on normal bronchial epithelial cells and lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

    Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol.

    (1993)
  • W.R. Smythe et al.

    Integrin expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (1995)
  • M. Takeichi

    Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell–cell adhesion

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (1990)
  • M. Takeichi

    Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator

    Science

    (1991)
  • M. Ozawa et al.

    The cytoplasmic domain of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin associates with three independent proteins structurally related in different species

    EMBO J.

    (1989)
  • K.A. Knudsen et al.

    Plakoglobin or an 83 kD homologue distinct from β-catenin, interacts with E-cadherin and N-cadherin

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1992)
  • W. Birchmeier et al.

    Molecular mechanisms leading to cell junction (Cadherin) deficiency in invasive carcinomas

    Cancer Biol.

    (1993)
  • Y. Doki et al.

    Correlation between E-cadherin expression and invasiveness in vitro in a human esophageal cancer line

    Cancer Res.

    (1993)
  • J. Behrens et al.

    Dissecting tumor cell invasion: epithelial cells acquire invasive properties after the loss of uvomorulin-mediated cell–cell adhesion

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1989)
  • U.H. Frixen et al.

    E-cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion prevents invasiveness of human carcinoma cells

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1991)
  • K. Hatta et al.

    Cloning and expression of cDNA encoding a neural calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule: its identity in the cadherin gene family

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1988)
  • J.H. Schipper et al.

    E-cadherin expression in squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck: inverse correlation with tumor dedifferentiation and lymph node metastasis

    Cancer Res.

    (1991)
  • V. Mattijssen et al.

    E-cadherin expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is associated with clinical outcome

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1993)
  • H.K. Shiozaki et al.

    Expression of immunoreactive E-cadherin adhesion molecules in human cancers

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1991)
  • T. Kadowaki et al.

    Cadherin and α-catenin expression in human esophageal cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (1994)
  • R. Umbas et al.

    Expression of the cellular adhesion molecule E-cadherin is reduced or absent in high-grade prostate cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (1992)
  • R. Umbas et al.

    Decreased E-cadherin expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (1994)
  • P.P. Bringuier et al.

    Decreased E-cadherin immunoreactivity correlates with poor survival in patients with bladder tumors

    Cancer Res.

    (1993)
  • T. Otto et al.

    Inverse relation of E-cadherin and autocrine motility factor receptor expression as a prognostic factor in patients with bladder carcinomas

    Cancer Res.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (51)

    • PM<inf>2.5</inf> induces the distant metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma via promoting the stem cell properties of cancer cells

      2022, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the same time, MMP2 and MMP9 had been showing the same trend. SNAI1, TWIST1, and ZEB families are core regulators of the EMT process, which were significantly up-regulated in both BPM and SPM groups (Avasarala et al., 2015; Smythe et al., 1999). SNAI2, ZEB1, ZEB2, and PRMT1 have been up-regulated in the SPM group, demonstrating the effectors of TWIST1 (Taube et al., 2010).

    • High expression of P-cadherin is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

      2018, Lung Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Ki-67 proliferation index was previously reported to be a prognostic influence in NSCLC with a high index pointing toward poor prognosis [19,20]. In lung cancer, previous study reported the association between P-cadherin expression and the degree of differentiation [21,22], but the characteristics associated with this prognosis have not been reported before. Our findings suggested that high P-cadherin expression might constitute a novel marker for NSCLC.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    rsmythenotes.mdacc.tmc.edu

    View full text