Elsevier

Molecular Brain Research

Volume 117, Issue 2, 7 October 2003, Pages 129-138
Molecular Brain Research

Research report
Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine on striatal GDNF and nigral GFRα1 and RET mRNAs in the adult rat

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-328X(03)00289-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Exogenous GDNF as well as vectors containing the gene for this trophic factor has been shown to be neuroprotective in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. We therefore investigated whether changes in striatal GDNF protein and nigral mRNA levels of its co-receptors GFRα1 and RET occur in response to lesions of dopamine (DA) neurons and examined the temporal profile of these changes as they relate to the loss of dopaminergic markers. Rats were lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine and sacrificed 3 h to 60 days post-infusion. DA tissue levels in the striatum and tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the substantia nigra (SN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) were used to determine the size of the lesions. GDNF protein was measured in the striatum using radioimmunocytochemistry. In situ hybridization was used to determine alterations in the mRNAs of RET and GFRα1 in the SN and VTA. We observed no persistent changes in GDNF protein in the striatum in response to 6-hydroxydopamine over the 60-day observation period, suggesting that compensatory changes in this trophic factor do not occur in response to injury. Dramatic decreases in RET and GFRα1 were observed in both SN and VTA that were generally correlated with the loss of TH protein and striatal DA content, strongly suggesting that these receptors are located on DA neurons and that the protective effect of GDNF reflects a direct action of the trophic factor on these neurons.

Introduction

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), a member of the TGFβ family of neurotrophic factors, has been shown to reduce both spontaneous dopamine (DA) neuron death and DA neuron loss due to 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) in embryonic and neonatal mesencephalic cultures [1], [12], [19], [24], [37], [42]. Although the basal expression of GDNF is very low in adult rodent brains [16], administration of exogenous GDNF or the delivery of GDNF via gene therapy can increase the apparent capacity of DA neurons to release their transmitter [55] and protect and even rescue adult DA neurons from injury caused by 6-OHDA and MPTP [17], [22], [32], [36]. Thus, GDNF or related molecules ultimately may provide a therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with the loss of DA neurons that project from substantia nigra (SN) to striatum and to a lesser extent from ventral tegmental area (VTA) to nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex [8], [23].

In addition to suggesting a therapeutic approach to PD, further understanding of the actions of GDNF may provide insights into the etiology of the disease. First, studies of postmortem brains from patients with PD suggest that loss of GDNF and other neurotrophic factors may be involved [14], [53]. Second, since GDNF and/or its receptors can be increased in response to certain toxic insults [5], [21], [25], [46], [64], PD could represent a failure of GDNF to respond to incipient injury. Thus, a more detailed study of the effects of 6-OHDA-induced lesions of DA neurons on GDNF and the elements of its receptor complex, GFRα1 and RET, should provide us with information regarding the origin of this protein, its response to DA neuronal damage and its sites of action.

In the studies to be presented in this report, we observed that GDNF protein was present in measurable amounts in the adult rat striatum but did not show a sustained increase in response to 6-OHDA. We also found that the expression of both GFRα1 and RET mRNAs in SN and VTA was reduced by 6-OHDA in proportion to the loss in those structures of the rate-limiting enzyme for DA biosynthesis, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). Thus, our studies suggest that whereas the brain is unable to respond to 6-OHDA by an upregulation of GDNF signaling, DA neurons do have the capacity to be directly affected by exogenous GDNF or the delivery of GDNF through the administration of a gene encoding for this trophic factor.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirty eight male Sprague–Dawley rats (Hilltop Lab Animals, Scottdale, PA, USA) weighing 250–275 g at the start of the experiment were group housed in a temperature controlled environment and maintained on a normal 12-h light/dark cycle with lights on at 07:00 am. Food and water were available throughout the experiment ad libitum. Animals were allowed to adjust to their environment in the housing facility at least 1 week prior to surgery. All procedures were in strict accordance with the NIH’s

Time course of decreases in striatal DA after 6-OHDA

Tissue levels of striatal DA were determined at various times after 6-OHDA administration. The largest decrease in DA level was observed between 6 h and 1 day post-lesion. By 1 day, a significant decrease in striatal DA content (>80%, P<0.001) was observed. Smaller decreases were observed over subsequent days, with maximal decreases occurring 14–60 days post-lesion (P<0.001; Fig. 1).

Time course of TH protein levels in the SN and VTA after 6-OHDA

The loss of TH protein in the SN was more gradual than loss of striatal DA. A 40% reduction of TH

Lesion-induced changes in striatal DA and in TH immunoreactivity in SN and VTA

In the present study, we sought to determine if compensatory changes in GDNF protein or receptor subunit mRNA occurred in response to neuronal injury. We infused 6-OHDA into the MFB and monitored changes in GDNF protein and receptor mRNA in the striatum and SN, respectively, beginning 3 h post-infusion. Striatal DA content and nigral TH protein were used to determine the extent of damage to the nigrostriatal system in response to neurotoxic insult.

Within 6 h post-infusion of 6-OHDA, the number

Uncited figure

Fig. 4 now uncited in text!

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to Susan D. Giegel for assistance with the preparation of this manuscript. A preliminary report of this research has been presented at a meeting of the Society for Neuroscience [54]. The research was supported in part by USPHS grants NS19608 and NS39267.

References (66)

  • B.S. Jeon et al.

    6-Hydroxydopamine lesion of the rat substantia nigra: time course and morphology of cell death

    Neurodegeneration

    (1995)
  • S. Jing et al.

    GDNF-induced activation of the ret protein tyrosine kinase is mediated by GDNFR-alpha, a novel receptor for GDNF

    Cell

    (1996)
  • C.M. Kearns et al.

    GDNF protects nigral dopamine neurons against 6-hydroxydopamine in vivo

    Brain Res.

    (1995)
  • H. Kitagawa et al.

    Induction of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor receptor proteins in cerebral cortex and striatum after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats

    Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • Z. Kokaia et al.

    Rapid alterations of BDNF protein levels in the rat brain after focal ischemia: evidence for increased synthesis and anterograde axonal transport

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1998)
  • D.A. Kozlowski et al.

    Delivery of a GDNF gene into the substantia nigra after a progressive 6-OHDA lesion maintains functional nigrostriatal connections

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2000)
  • C.L. Liang et al.

    Midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the mouse that contain calbindin-D28k exhibit reduced vulnerability to MPTP-induced neurodegeneration

    Neurodegeneration

    (1996)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    A cDNA that suppresses MPP+ toxicity encodes a vesicular amine transporter

    Cell

    (1992)
  • E. Melamed et al.

    Mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons are not spared by MPTP neurotoxicity in mice

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1985)
  • M. Reeben et al.

    The messenger RNAs for both glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor receptors, c-ret and GDNFRalpha, are induced in the rat brain in response to kainate-induced excitation

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • M. Rodriguez et al.

    Dopamine cell degeneration induced by intraventricular administration of 6-hydroxydopamine in the rat: similarities with cell loss in parkinson’s disease

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2001)
  • H. Sauer et al.

    Progressive degeneration of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons following intrastriatal terminal lesions with 6-hydroxydopamine: a combined retrograde tracing and immunocytochemical study in the rat

    Neuroscience

    (1994)
  • G.J. Siegel et al.

    Neurotrophic factors in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease brain

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (2000)
  • I. Strömberg et al.

    Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is expressed in the developing but not adult striatum and stimulates developing dopamine neurons in vivo

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1993)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    Calbindin-D 28 kDa immunofluorescence in ventral mesencephalic neurons labeled following injections of Fluoro-Gold in nucleus accumbens subterritories: inverse relationship relative to known neurotoxin vulnerabilities

    Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    On the altered expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and calbindin-D 28 kDa immunoreactivities and viability of neurons in the ventral tegmental area of Tsai following injections of 6-hydroxydopamine in the medial forebrain bundle in the rat

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • D.M. Yurek et al.

    Differential expression of GDNF, BDNF, and NT-3 in the aging nigrostriatal system following a neurotoxic lesion

    Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • P. Akerud et al.

    Differential effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurturin on developing and adult substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons

    J. Neurochem.

    (1999)
  • C.A. Altar et al.

    Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its role in the brain

    Nature

    (1997)
  • D.M. Araujo et al.

    ret receptor tyrosine kinase immunoreactivity is altered in glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor-responsive neurons following lesions of the nigrostriatal and septohippocampal pathways

    Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • M.C. Austin et al.

    Tyrosine hydroxylase and galanin mRNA levels in locus coeruleus neurons are increased following reserpine administration

    Synapse

    (1990)
  • P.E. Batchelor et al.

    Inhibition of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expression reduces dopaminergic sprouting in the injured striatum

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • P.E. Batchelor et al.

    Activated macrophages and microglia induce dopaminergic sprouting in the injured striatum and express brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor

    J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (21)

    • 6-Hydroxydopamine induces distinct alterations in GDF5 and GDNF mRNA expression in the rat nigrostriatal system in vivo

      2014, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the decreases in GFRα1 and RET mRNA midbrain levels at later time-points after both striatal and MFB lesions is probably due to the fact that these receptors are located on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, and thus the loss of their expression correlates with 6-OHDA-induced dopaminergic neuronal loss. In agreement, Smith and colleagues reported that GFRα1 and RET mRNA levels in the midbrain decreased following 6-OHDA MFB lesion [29]. In contrast, Kozlowski and colleagues, using RT-QPCR, reported no change in GFRα1 mRNA levels in the ipsilateral nigra after 6-OHDA intrastriatal or MFB lesion [19].

    • Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor is essential for electroconvulsive shock-induced neuroprotection in an animal model of Parkinson's disease

      2011, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Likewise, the literature on the effect of 6-OHDA on striatal GDNF expression is not uniform. One publication found (as we did in this report and previously in Anastasía et al., 2007) no changes in striatal GDNF (Smith et al., 2003), while other reported an upregulation of striatal GDNF mRNA (+1100%) (Zhou et al., 2000) and protein levels (+36%) (Yurek and Fletcher-Turner, 2001). One possible explanation for the differences is that while we report results assessed by immunohistochemical analysis (and previously using SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blot analysis) other studies utilized either RT-PCR (Zhou et al., 2000) or ELISA (Yurek and Fletcher-Turner, 2001).

    • Effects of intrastriatal GDNF on the response of dopamine neurons to 6-hydroxydopamine: Time course of protection and neurorestoration

      2011, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Animals were sacrificed via decapitation and a 2 mm section of striatum was dissected centered on the needle track made by prior injections. Dissected striata were assayed using minor modifications of a previous method (Smith et al. 2003). Striatal tissue was suspended in 0.1 N HClO2, homogenized and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was removed.

    • Effect of nigrostriatal damage induced by 6-hydroxydopamine on the expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the striatum of the rat

      2009, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the exact signaling pathway of GDNF is still not completely understood, it is known that GDNF binds to GFRα1 (and to a lesser extent to GFRα2) after which a complex with c-RET is formed. After administration of 6-OHDA, GFRα1 mRNA expression levels in the SN (and the striatum) were decreased or remained unaltered (Marco et al., 2002; Smith et al., 2003; Kozlowski et al., 2004). Again it is important to note that receptor protein levels do not always follow the same pattern as receptor mRNA levels.

    • Driving GDNF expression: The green and the red traffic lights

      2008, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the striatum, an increase in GDNF mRNA or protein levels has been observed after 6-OHDA-induced (Zhou et al., 2000; Nakajima et al., 2001; Yurek and Fletcher-Turner, 2001, 2002; Hida et al., 2003) or MPTP-induced injury (Tang et al., 1998). However, other authors have failed to detect changes in striatal GDNF levels after 6-OHDA lesion (Stromberg et al., 1993; Smith et al., 2003; Anastasia et al., 2007) or MPTP treatment (Inoue et al., 1999; Collier et al., 2005). These conflicting results might arise from differences in the injury models and protocols, or different time points analysed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text