A spectrometer for study of high mass objects created in relativistic heavy ion reactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00679-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Experiment E864 at the Brookhaven AGS accelerator uses a high sensitivity, large acceptance spectrometer, designed to search for strangelets and other novel forms of matter produced in high-energy heavy ion collisions. The spectrometer has excellent acceptance and rate capabilities for measuring the production properties of known particles and nuclei such as p̄, d̄ and 6He. The experiment uses a magnetic spectrometer and employs redundant time of flight and position detectors and a hadronic calorimeter. In this paper we describe the design and performance of the spectrometer.

Introduction

Experiment 864 is an open geometry, two-dipole magnetic spectrometer designed to search for Strange Quark Matter (SQM) in Au+heavy nucleus collisions at 11.5 A GeV/c. Due to the nature of the design of the rare particle search, the spectrometer is also well suited for detecting nuclear isotopes 6He, 7Li, etc.) and anti-matter (anti-protons p̄ and anti-deuterons d̄). The spectrometer identifies particles via their mass M and charge Z. A perspective view of the spectrometer is shown in Fig. 1. The main components are beam defining counters, a target system (usually Pb or Pt), a multiplicity counter for triggering on the centrality of the event, two analysis dipole magnets, three stations of hodoscopes for Time of Flight (TOF) and tracking, two stations of straw tubes for tracking, a hadronic calorimeter and a large vacuum tank not shown in this figure. The experiment also utilizes a high-speed data acquisition system (2.7 Mbytes per second) and a flexible second-level trigger (Late Energy Trigger) based on TOF and energy as measured by the calorimeter. In this paper we will describe the design considerations, their implementation and the performance of the various components and the integrated system.

The paper is organized as follows. The introduction contains a discussion of the design, an overview of the apparatus and a discussion of the expected backgrounds. The later sections give detailed descriptions of each subsystem and their performance:

Unless otherwise noted, the description will be that of the configuration during the 1996/1997 AGS heavy ion run. The experiment was also operated during the 1994 heavy ion run with a partial implementation of the calorimeter and S3 tracking station and during the 1995 run with the complete calorimeter and S3. The full LET was implemented in the 1995 run. The final run was in 1998.

The primary goal of the experiment is to search for the specific class of charged and neutral strangelets [1], [2] which are predicted to have the following characteristics:

These characteristics suggest a strategy of looking for mid-rapidity, massive objects with an unusual Z/A ratio in an apparatus with a high rate capability and redundancy for background rejection. The E864 apparatus shown in Fig. 1 implements this strategy by measuring the momentum, charge, energy and TOF of particles. Charged particles are tracked and their TOF determined using fast scintillator hodoscopes. In addition straw tube planes are used for precision tracking, thus the system has considerable redundancy. The search for neutral strangelets requires a hadronic calorimeter with good energy and TOF resolution. The calorimeter also adds an independent mass measurement for charged tracks. The spectrometer design uses an open geometry so that the acceptance is not overly model dependent. This also facilitates a high sensitivity and allows for correlation studies and growth potential.

The experiment is located in the A3 beam line of the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) accelerator at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The incoming Au ion is fully stripped to its charge of +79 and has a momentum of 11.5 A GeV/c. The ions are incident on a target whose composition and thickness depend on the particular physics topic. The thickness is typically between 5% and 60% of a Au interaction length. The nucleon–nucleon center of mass energy is 4.6 GeV and its rapidity y is 1.6.

The entire spectrometer is shown in the elevation and plan views in Fig. 2. The global coordinate system used throughout this paper has the plan view in the (xz) plane and the elevation view in the (yz) plane (using a right handed coordinate system). The large gray box in the elevation view is an aluminum and steel vacuum chamber which surrounds the target and extends over the entire length of the apparatus. The vacuum chamber allows non-interacting Au ions and forward going beam fragments to continue in vacuum over the remainder of the sensitive detectors, thus avoiding interactions with air which would shower secondary particles throughout the detector. Particles of interest (within the acceptance) exit the vacuum chamber just after the second dipole magnet approximately 8.5 m downstream of the target through a thin vacuum window made of layers of Mylar and Kevlar. These particles then proceed through the downstream portion of the spectrometer, which resides just below the vacuum chamber. Thus, the spectrometer acceptance does not extend to zero degrees, but the detectors are as close to the vacuum chamber as possible. The acceptance is defined by a collimator residing inside the first dipole magnet M1. The various angular restrictions are shown in Fig. 3. The beam transport, plug and collimator designs are extremely important in reducing backgrounds due to secondary interactions. Details can be found in Ref. [3]. The effectiveness of the design is demonstrated in the low occupancies in the downstream detectors in agreement with the Monte Carlo (MC) simulations (see Section 9).

The downstream spectrometer consists of three TOF hodoscope planes (H1–H3), two straw tube tracking stations (S2, S3), and a hadronic calorimeter (CAL), whose positions and sizes are shown in Table 1. The parameters in the table are measured with respect to the target except for the horizontal and vertical axis positions which are measured with respect to the neutral line. The hodoscopes provide three measurements of spatial position, time and charge. The velocity of particles is determined from the timing information. Track candidates, found using the hodoscopes only, are projected to the straw planes and straw tube hits are added for better track spatial resolution. Then, the downstream track segments are projected into the magnetic fields. The tracks are assumed to come from the target, thus determining their rigidities (R=p/Z). The masses are calculated usingm=R×Zγβ.

Particles are thus uniquely identified by their mass and charge state. The tracks are then projected to the calorimeter where the energies of the particles are determined. Using the measured energies and the particle velocities from the downstream hodoscopes, one obtains a second measurement of the particle masses:m=Eγ−1baryonsm=Eγ+0.6anti-baryons.

(The formula for anti-baryons takes into account the fact that approximately 80% of the annihilation energy is detected in the calorimeter.) Neutral particles can be identified on the basis of the calorimeter time and energy alone, using the tracking detectors to reject charged particles which deposit energy in the calorimeter.

The experiment operates with the two dipole magnets (M1 and M2). Their field strengths and polarities can be varied in order to optimize the acceptance for various particle species and to sweep out uninteresting lighter particles. Table 2 shows a list of the standard field settings used in the experiment. The two magnets M1 and M2 are set to the same polarity and field strength for any given setting. The sign convention for the setting indicates the charged species which is bent into the acceptance of the detector. It should be noted that neutral particle searches could be done at any of the field settings, but are best done at +1.5 T because this field is the most effective at sweeping charged particles out of the spectrometer.

The trigger for the experiment is based on centrality as measured by pulse height in a scintillator annulus just downstream of the target. In order to achieve the desired sensitivities a second-level trigger (Late Energy Trigger) based on time and energy information from the calorimeter has been implemented.

Given the layout just described, the main backgrounds are expected to be those which produce real tracks with the same directions and velocities as the tracks of interest. Sources of such tracks are:The first class of backgrounds has been minimized with veto counters and the detection of multiple beam tracks in the trigger counters. The second class of background can be minimized by requiring that the momentum as measured by the tracking chambers agree with the energy as measured in the calorimeter. The rationale for the two magnet design plus the straw tube station S1 near the target was to detect this second class of background. Due to cost and construction problems S1 was not implemented. Λ's and Λ̄'s decays are not an important source of background because most of them decay upstream of the first magnet. The p or p̄ carries most of the momentum of the parent Λ or Λ̄ and is reconstructed as if it came from the target. Background problems associated with searches for neutral particles are more severe. In addition to all the background associated with charged particle searches additional backgrounds are present due to the inability to track neutral particles.

Section snippets

Beam counters, targets and multiplicity counters

The experimental layout upstream of the first magnet is shown in Fig. 4. As implemented for the (1996/1997) run, it consisted of two quartz Cherenkov beam defining counters, MIT Cherenkov (MITCH) and MICro MITCH (MIC) (not shown in Fig. 4), one-quartz Cherenkov veto counter, mounted in the same enclosure as MITCH, one scintillator veto counter, located just upstream of a target wheel which contained a choice of nuclear targets, and a scintillator multiplicity counter to select events with the

Hodoscopes

The heart of the spectrometer tracking is the scintillator TOF hodoscope system. There are three independent stations, H1–H3, whose parameters are given in Table 1. The detector locations are shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2. The three hodoscopes provide independent and redundant measurements of a particle's TOF as well as its position. Requiring that a good space track also have consistent velocities as measured at each of the hodoscopes significantly improves the background rejection. The hodoscopes

Straw tube stations

In order to improve the spatial resolution for tracked particles, the apparatus has two downstream stations of straw tubes, referred to as S2 and S3 in Table 1 and Fig. 1, Fig. 2. A complete description can be found in Ref. [11]. Each station consists of three sub-planes (x,u,v). The straws of the x plane are mounted vertically and the straws of the u and v planes are mounted at ±20° relative to vertical, respectively. Each sub-plane consists of two staggered layers of straw tubes 4 mm in

Calorimeter description and performance

The final element of the spectrometer is a “spaghetti” design hadronic calorimeter as shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2. The location and overall dimensions are given in Table 1. Its purpose is to provide a second independent mass measurement for charged particles and to identify neutral particles based on β and the deposited energy (See Eq. (2)). The tower construction is based on a design first tested by the SPACAL collaboration [13]. The spaghetti design allows a close-packed geometry and virtually

Data acquisition

The Data Acquisition System (DAQ) needs to run at a high rate in order for the experiment to achieve its high level of sensitivity. The DAQ was designed to record 4000 events (where a typical event size is 6000 bytes) per AGS spill (one second beam spill every 4 s). A minimum rate of 1000 events per AGS spill is required for the experiment to reach its design sensitivity. In the 1996 running we were able to record approximately 1800 events per spill.

The overall DAQ architecture is shown in Fig. 9

Monte Carlo simulations

Extensive use of a GEANT3 [19] based Monte Carlo of the apparatus has been made both in designing the shielding and detector as well as determining acceptances and efficiencies for the physics results. In the design phase, complete HIJET5 events were traced through the GEANT3 model of the apparatus. All physical processes such as multiple scattering and secondary interactions were included as well as the magnetic fields and the physical apertures. In the analysis stage, acceptances and

Acceptance

The acceptance of the spectrometer for neutral particles is determined by the physical apertures of the collimators and magnets as shown in Fig. 3. The neutral acceptance thus depends only on the production angle of the particles. For charged particles with momentum p and transverse momentum pt, the acceptance in rigidity R=p/Z and transverse rigidity Rt=pt/Z is constrained by the field in the magnets as well as these apertures. Different fields were used for different physics topics as

System performance

In this section we will describe the actual performance of the detectors in measuring the physical quantities of interest. We begin with the occupancies seen in the various detectors. Next, we describe the tracking and momentum reconstruction algorithm followed by a discussion of the spatial resolutions of the hodoscopes and the straw tubes, the β calculation and resolution using the hodoscope TDC information and the charge determination. The performance of the calorimeter has already been

Summary and conclusions

This paper has described the design and performance of the BNL E864 spectrometer. The spectrometer was built primarily to look for strange quark matter produced in relativistic heavy ion collisions but was also used successfully in detecting heavy fragments up to A=7 produced from Au-induced central collisions. The spectrometer was also used to measure the production of p̄'s. In order to reach the above goals the E864 spectrometer was built with a high rate capacity and high acceptance with

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the AGS staff. This work was supported by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy's High Energy and Nuclear Physics Division, the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Instituto Nationale di Fiscia Nucleare of Italy.

References (24)

  • P Haridas

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1997)
  • T.A Armstrong

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1999)
  • D Acosta

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1991)
  • D Acosta

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1992)
  • J.C Hill

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1999)
  • A Chikanian et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1996)
  • T.A Armstrong

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (1997)
  • E Farhi et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (1984)
  • E Farhi et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (1985)
  • K.N. Barish, Search for positively charged strange quark matter, Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University,...
  • Hamamatsu Corporation, Bridge Water, NJ 08807-0910,...
  • T. Ludlam et al., BNL-37196,...
  • 1

    Formerly at Yale University and University of California at Los Angeles, USA.

    2

    Present address: LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

    3

    Present address: 7 Fox Hill Lane, Enfield, CT 06082, USA.

    4

    Present address: University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

    5

    Deceased.

    6

    Present address: TJNAF, Newport News, VA 23606, USA.

    7

    Formerly at Purdue University.

    8

    Present address: 31 Kolbert Dr., Scarsdale, NY 19583, USA.

    9

    Present address: Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

    10

    Present address: University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

    11

    Present address: Lock Haven University, Lock Haven, PA 17745, USA.

    12

    Present address: Institut de Physique Nucleaire 91406 ORSAY Cedex, France

    13

    Present address: MIT Lincoln Lab., Cambridge, MA 02173, USA.

    14

    Present address: University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

    15

    Present address: College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA.

    View full text