Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 26, Issue 8, August 2003, Pages 402-404
Journal home page for Trends in Neurosciences

Research Focus
Alcohol and error processing

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00175-9Get rights and content

Abstract

A recent study indicates that alcohol consumption reduces the amplitude of the error-related negativity (ERN), a negative deflection in the electroencephalogram associated with error commission. Here, we explore possible mechanisms underlying this result in the context of two recent theories about the neural system that produces the ERN – one based on principles of reinforcement learning and the other based on response conflict monitoring.

Section snippets

Reinforcement-learning theory of the ERN

According to the reinforcement-learning theory of the ERN [5], a response-monitoring system located in the basal ganglia produces error signals that activate the mesencephalic dopamine system, and the ERN is elicited by the impact of this phasic dopamine activity on the anterior cingulate cortex. Specifically, the theory proposes that a motor control system involving the anterior cingulate cortex generates behavior appropriate to the current external context (Fig. 1a). Simultaneously, a

Conflict-monitoring theory of the ERN

According to a second theory, the ERN reflects the activation of a conflict-monitoring system following error commission [6] (N. Yeung, M. Botvinick and J.D. Cohen, unpublished). Specifically, this theory proposes that the anterior cingulate cortex monitors for response conflict (the simultaneous activation of incompatible response channels) and conveys this information to brain regions involved in cognitive control, such as lateral prefrontal cortex. A computational model of response selection

Future research

Thus, alcohol consumption could reduce ERN amplitude either directly, by affecting the monitoring system that produces the ERN, or indirectly, by affecting the stimulus processing system upon which the monitoring system depends. A future experiment could decide between these two possibilities. In particular, we envisage a replication of Ridderinkhof et al.'s experiment with a new control placebo condition, in which participants respond to degraded stimuli such that their behavioral measures are

References (14)

  • W. Schultz

    Getting formal with dopamine and reward

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • G.L. Gessa

    Low doses of ethanol activate dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area

    Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • K.R. Ridderinkhof

    Alcohol consumption impairs detection of performance errors in mediofrontal cortex

    Science

    (2002)
  • M. Falkenstein

    Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention

  • W.J. Gehring

    A neural system for error detection and compensation

    Psychol. Sci.

    (1993)
  • M.G.H. Coles

    Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2001)
  • C.B. Holroyd et al.

    The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text