Trends in Neurosciences
Research FocusNumb and Numblike control cell number during vertebrate neurogenesis
Section snippets
Opposing roles suggested for Numb in neural development
Cell divisions resulting in proteins being asymmetrically distributed in the daughter cells are thought to play a key role in these fate decisions. In Drosophila, multiple asymmetrically localized proteins have been identified [3]. One of these, called Numb, has been shown to be important in cell fate decisions, and in some of these choice points Numb functions through inhibition of Notch signaling 4, 5. Vertebrate Numb, and a related protein, Numblike (Nbl), have been identified 6, 7 and, like
A role for Numb and Nbl in maintaining the progenitor state
Teasing out the different functions of Numb will require additional creative approaches. To this end, a recent knockout provides convincing evidence that Numb, and the related Nbl, play a key role in maintaining neural progenitor cells [13]. This study, with its elegant use of mouse mutants, has bypassed the early lethality of the numb/nbl double mutant, allowing a detailed analysis of the consequences of loss of these two related proteins at early stages of neurogenesis. For this study, nbl
Unresolved issues
This study, while demonstrating a role for Numb and Nbl in maintaining the progenitor state, does not preclude the additional proposal that Numb biases cells to the neuronal fate at different stages in different cellular contexts. The conditional numb/nbl double knockout will be a powerful tool to address later functions of these proteins, by driving Cre at stages of neurogenesis later than that used for the recent study. Additional questions concerning the mechanism of Numb function still
References (17)
Constructing the cerebral cortex: neurogenesis and fate determination
Neuron
(1995)Numbers, time and neocortical neurogenesis: a general developmental and evolutionary model
Trends Neurosci.
(1995)- et al.
Numb antagonizes Notch signaling to specify sibling neuron cell fates
Neuron
(1996) Asymmetric localization of a mammalian numb homolog during mouse cortical neurogenesis
Neuron
(1996)Mammalian NUMB is an evolutionarily conserved signaling adapter protein that specifies neuronal cell fates
Curr. Biol.
(1996)NUMB localizes in the basal cortex of mitotic avian neuroepithelial cells and modulates neuronal differentiation by binding to NOTCH-1
Neuron
(1999)Developmental changes in Notch1 and Numb expression mediated by local cell–cell interactions underlie progressively increasing Delta sensitivity in neural crest stem cells
Dev. Biol.
(2002)Multiple roles of mouse Numb in tuning developmental cell fates
Curr. Biol.
(2001)
Cited by (32)
Numb deficiency impairs retinal structure and visual function in mice
2022, Experimental Eye ResearchCitation Excerpt :Numb is an adapter protein that engages in many signaling pathways and interacts with molecules including Notch, Hedgehog, and p53(Verdi, Schmandt et al., 1996; Dho, French et al., 1999; Gulino, Di Marcotullio et al., 2010). Numblike (Nbl) acts functionally redundant with its homolog Numb in mammals, and various transgene studies in mouse cerebral progenitors revealed that Numb and Nbl are essential for neurogenesis(Zhong, Jiang et al., 1997; Johnson, 2003). As knockout of Numb or Nbl alone did not affect the retinal normal architecture and function, our studies are based on Numb and Nbl both conditional double-knockout in the retina.
The evolution of early neurogenesis
2015, Developmental CellEpigenetic programming of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in response to fetal hypoxia
2015, Progress in NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :Liu and colleagues found that MBD1 deficiency damaged adult neural stem/progenitor cell (aNSC) differentiation and the neurogenesis process, potentially targeting miR-184 that promotes NSC proliferation and inhibits differentiation. Numbl, a known regulator of the development of the brain and embryonic NSC proliferation and differentiation (Johnson, 2003; Li et al., 2003), is the downstream target of miR-184. Through binding to the 3′UTR of Numbl mRNA, miR184 affects its translation.
Epigenetic regulation of miR-184 by MBD1 governs neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation
2010, Cell Stem CellCitation Excerpt :We next asked whether Numbl could rescue the deficits associated with miR-184 overexpression. Numbl has been shown to affect the proliferation and differentiation of embryonic NSCs (Johnson, 2003; Li et al., 2003); however, its roles in adult NSCs have not been clearly defined. We therefore tested whether overexpression of Numbl would repress the proliferation of aNSCs.
Mutation and copy number analysis of LNX1 and Numbl in nervous system tumors
2008, Cancer Genetics and CytogeneticsCitation Excerpt :Numbl is involved in maintaining neural progenitor cells during embryogenesis by allowing their progenies to choose progenitor over neuronal fate [9]. In addition, Numbl functions to maintain the self-renewal properties of the neural progenitor cells in the neural tube [16]. A recent report shows that mammalian Numb homologs are required throughout neurogenesis to maintain progenitor cells instead of promoting neuronal fates, because Numb and Numbl loss causes premature depletion of progenitor cells and overproduction of neurons [9,10].
A comparative analysis of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) expression in mouse brain and Lewy body disease
2007, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :A second, weaker Lrrk2 substrate identified by the same authors, collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2), is also of interest since CRMP-2 is involved in regulation of growth cones and microtubule dynamics (Stenmark et al., 2007). In addition it also interacts with Numb, an endocytosis-related protein that controls cell number in neurogenesis (Johnson, 2003; Stenmark et al., 2007). Furthermore CRMP-2 is found in active neurogenesis areas including hippocampus and the olfactory bulb (Charrier et al., 2003; Veyrac et al., 2005) Finally, phosphorylated CRMP-2 has been postulated to play a role in neurodegeneration since it is found in neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease (Gu et al., 2000; Yoshida et al., 1998).