Elsevier

Infant Behavior and Development

Volume 8, Issue 2, April–June 1985, Pages 125-138
Infant Behavior and Development

The equivalence of cues in the perception of speech by infants*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80001-1Get rights and content

The perceptual equivalence of the temporal and spectral cues that differentiate the words say and stay was investigated in 2-, 3-, and 4-month-old infants. The specific values of the temporal and spectral cues were arranged within each member of the stimulus pairs to be discriminated so that they either “cooperated” or “conflicted” in the manner in which they signaled this stop-consonant manner contrast. The stimuli in pairs with cooperating cues were discriminated whereas stimuli differentiated by conflicting cues were not discriminated; both findings are in accord with the equivalence of cues hypothesis. The results also affirm the contention that the cues for speech derive their effectiveness, at least in part, from the manner in which they specify a categorical representation.

References (23)

  • MillerJ.L. et al.

    Studies on the categorization of speech by infants

    Cognition

    (1983)
  • WolfC.G.

    The perception of stop consonants by children

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1973)
  • BestC.T. et al.

    Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception

    Perception & Psychophysics

    (1981)
  • ChapinC. et al.

    Short-term release cues to stop-consonant place of articulation in child speech

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1982)
  • CuttingJ.E.

    Four assumptions about invariance in perception

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1983)
  • EimasP.D.

    Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants

    Perception & Psychophysics

    (1974)
  • EimasP.D. et al.

    Contextual effects in infant speech perception

    Science

    (1980)
  • Eimas, P. D., Miller, J. L. & Jusczyk, P. W. (in press). On infant speech perception and the acquisition of language....
  • FitchH.L. et al.

    Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner

    Perception & Psychophysics

    (1980)
  • HaggardM.P. et al.

    Pitch as a voicing cue

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1970)
  • JusczykP.W.

    Infant speech perception: A critical appraisal

  • Cited by (12)

    • When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone

      2013, Journal of Memory and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      The psychophysical properties of acoustic cues are not the only properties that likely contribute to perceptual salience. Phonetic contrasts are almost always cued by several acoustic properties, and the degree to which these cues are in concordance can often affect both infants’ (e.g., Eimas, 1985; Sato et al., 2012) and adults’ (see McMurray and Jongman (2011) for review) abilities to perceive phonetic contrasts. Future work will need to ask how a system of co-varying cues to a particular phonetic contrast contributes to perceptual salience in development.

    • Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants

      2011, Journal of Phonetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Much research on subphonemic cues has focused on whether infants are able to discriminate when presented with a subset of cues, or whether the presence of multiple cues facilitates discrimination (e.g., burst spectrum and/or formant transitions as a cue to stop place; Miller, Morse, & Dorman, 1977; Moffitt, 1971; Walley, Pisoni, & Aslin, 1984; Williams & Bush, 1978; see also Jusczyk, 1981). Others have assessed whether infants compensate for subphonemic patterns (e.g., Eimas, 1985; Eimas & Miller, 1980a, 1991; Fowler, Best, & McRoberts, 1990; Levitt, Jusczyk, Murray, & Carden, 1988), in an attempt to see whether infants have innate access to gestural units (e.g., Fowler, 2006; Fowler et al., 1990), or whether such compensation responds to more basic auditory processes (e.g., Lotto, Kluender, & Holt, 1997; Lotto & Holt, 2006). Neither of these lines of research demonstrates developmental or experiential changes, so they do not bear on how infants learn multi-cue contrasts.

    • Infant Speech Perception: Processing Characteristics, Representational Units, and The Learning of Words

      1997, Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    This research was supported by Grant HD 05331-14 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    View full text