Beyond Prediction to Explanation in Risk Assessment Research: A Comparison of Two Explanatory Theories of Criminality and Recidivism
Section snippets
A New Generation of Risk Assessment Research
Predictions of dangerousness, violence, and recidivism continue to play an ever-growing role in the legal system. These psycho-legal assessments determine a myriad of legal outcomes including, but not limited to, probation status (i.e., prediction of recidivism), civil commitment (i.e., prediction of danger to self or others), psychotherapist liability under a Tarasoff duty (i.e., prediction of danger to a specified victim), the imposition of the death penalty (i.e., prediction of a continued
The Criminality Theories
Throughout the history of the social sciences there has been a vast number of theories advanced to both explain and predict criminality. Criminality, for purposes of this article, refers to a continued or repeated pattern of behavior in which an individual is convicted of violating the law. Few of these criminality theories, however, have been adequately operationalized to present empirical testable hypotheses. Two explanatory, theory-driven models of criminality, the competitively
Subjects
The records of 150 males who had been convicted of a crime and sentenced to probation in Pima County were collected. These 150 males consisted of two groups: (a) 75 randomly selected males whose probation was revoked during a 6-month period from October 1993 to March 1994, and (b) 75 randomly selected males who successfully completed probation from October 1993 to March 1994 (both sets of subjects were selected from Pima County's probation revocation data base).6
The Measurement Model
The results of the confirmatory factor analysis of the measurement model were mixed. The factor loadings between the 15 manifest variables and the 4 latent variables were statistically significant at p < .05. See Figure 3 for a visual representation of the measurement model, and factor loading scores of manifest variables on the latent variables. While the measurement model achieved adequate fit with the data (Normed Fit Index = .844, Non-Normed Fit Index = .884, and Confirmatory Fit Index =
Current Test of the Two Theories
One purpose of this article was to test the robustness of two theoretical models to explain the future behavior of the offenders tested in this study. Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) self-control model outperformed the CDM model on all statistical measures, including: fit indices, goodness-of-fit chi-squares, and parsimony. The self-control model fit the data adequately (Confirmatory Fit Index > .9), and a nested model comparison of the self-control and the CDM model indicated that the
References (37)
Sex, money, and paternityThe evolution of domestic violence
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1993)- et al.
Forcible rapeAn evolutionary perspective
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1983) - et al.
Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategyAn evolutionary theory of socialization
Child Development
(1991) EQS structural equations program manual
(1989)Sex differences in human mate preferencesEvolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
(1989)- et al.
Sexual strategies theoryAn evolutionary perspective on human mating
Psychology Review
(1993) Psychopathology in the adopted-away offspring of biological parents with anti-social behavior
Archives of General Psychiary
(1978)- et al.
Convergent and discriminant validity by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix
Psychological Bulletin
(1959) - et al.
Genetic and environmental factors in anti-social personality disorder
The origin of the species
(1859)
Personality and criminalityA dispositional analysis
Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illness
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
A general theory of crime
Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime
Journal of Research in Crime and Deliquency
Comparative efficiency if informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction proceduresThe clinical-statistical controversy
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
A note on portraying accuracy of violence
Law and Human Behavior
CommentaryTesting the general theory of crime
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Criminality in adoptees and their adoptive and biological parentsA pilot study
Cited by (14)
Low self-control and parole failure: An assessment of risk from a theoretical perspective
2006, Journal of Criminal JusticePrediction of dangerousness in mentally disordered offenders in Germany
2002, International Journal of Law and PsychiatryMeasuring what matters: Standardised risk levels for criminal recidivism risk
2022, Challenging Bias in Forensic Psychological Assessment and Testing: Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Working with Diverse PopulationsViolence risk assessment: Research and practice
2022, Clinical Forensic Psychology: Introductory Perspectives on OffendingA Principled Approach to the Construction of Risk Assessment Categories: The Council of State Governments Justice Center Five-Level System
2020, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyPersonality-related determinants of criminal recidivism
2012, Psihologija