CorrespondenceProtocols, probity, and publication
References (5)
- et al.
Protocols, probity, and publication
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet
Lancet
(2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (5)
Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting
2017, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :Item 24a on the CONSORT list “recommends” access to the trial protocol. Recently, leading medical journals began requiring the disclosure of protocols for published RCTs to the public [14,15]. This landmark event has significantly improved transparency in reporting and theoretically should reduce the frequency of selective outcome reporting because readers and reviewers can independently verify that outcome measures are identical to those in the protocol.
Comparison of eligibility criteria between protocols, registries, and publications of cancer clinical trials
2016, Journal of the National Cancer InstituteFialova L, Špaček M, Vychytil P. Conflict of interest: The world medical association statement
2011, Casopis Lekaru Ceskych
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.