Article
Nicotine Administration Impairs Sensory Gating in Long–Evans Rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00094-XGet rights and content

Abstract

In rats, effects of nicotine administration on sensory gating as indexed by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) are unclear. We have found that nicotine administration enhances ASR and PPI in Sprague–Dawley rats, but other investigators, using Long–Evans rats, have reported no effects or enhancement of PPI only. Numerous methodological differences exist among studies in addition to subject strain, however, making it unclear whether inconsistent behavioral responses are the result of different experimental procedures or indicate a true strain difference. To investigate the role of strain in nicotine’s effects on ASR and PPI, 192 male and female Long–Evans rats were administered 12 mg/kg/day nicotine via osmotic minipump for 14 days using identical methodologies employed in studies with Sprague–Dawley subjects. Effects of grouped vs. individual housing on these responses also were examined. Nicotine administration impaired ASR and PPI in Long–Evans subjects. These effects occurred in female rats regardless of housing condition, and interacted with housing in male rats. Results indicate that sex and housing are important variables in nicotine’s effects. Results suggest that subject strain may be an important variable in nicotine’s effects on sensory gating, and that responses of Sprague–Dawley vs. Long–Evans rats may represent a true strain difference.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were 96 male and 96 female Long–Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). During the baseline phase (predrug and prehousing manipulation) all animals were individually housed in standard polypropylene shoebox cages (42 × 20.5 × 20 cm) on hardwood chip bedding (Pine-Dri). Throughout the study animals had continuous access to rodent chow (Harlan Teklad 4% Mouse/Rat Diet 7001) and water. The housing room was maintained at 23°C at 50% relative humidity on a 12-h reverse

Body Weight

Figure 1 presents the body weight data. Nicotine-treated subjects’ body weights increased less over time than did saline-treated subjects’ body weights regardless of sex or phase [during males, F(4, 172) = 37.274, p < 0.05, and females, F(4, 172) = 9.912, p < 0.05; cessation males, F(5, 210) = 17.488, p < 0.05, and females, F(5, 210) = 24.782, p < 0.05]. Grouping also decreased body weight gains over time for all subjects [during males, F(4, 172) = 3.287, p < 0.05, and females, F(4, 172) =

Discussion

The purpose of the present experiment was to examine nicotine’s effects on attention in Long–Evans rats as operationalized in the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the ASR. In previous studies with Sprague–Dawley subjects, nicotine enhanced ASR and PPI 2, 3, 4, 5. This enhancement has been interpreted as analogous to the attentional enhancement demonstrated empirically in certain human subjects and reported by some human smokers when they smoke cigarettes. Results

Acknowledgements

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. This work was supported by USUHS-DoD grant RO72AR.

References (56)

  • J.R. Hughes

    Genetics of smokingA brief review

    Behav. Ther.

    (1986)
  • M.J. Marks et al.

    Genetic influences on nicotine responses

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1989)
  • D.E. Morse et al.

    Effects of ddC and AZT on locomotion and acoustic startle IAcute effects in female rats

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1997)
  • L.A. Pohorecky et al.

    Startle response in ratsEffects of ethanol

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1976)
  • M.D. Schechter et al.

    CNS effect of nicotine as the discriminative stimulus for the rat in a T-maze

    Life Sci.

    (1971)
  • N.R. Swerdlow et al.

    Men are more inhibited than women by weak prepulses

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • N.R. Swerdlow et al.

    Neural substrates for the motor-activating properties of psychostimulantsA review of recent findings

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1986)
  • K. Wesnes et al.

    Smoking, nicotine and human performance

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1983)
  • Acri, J. B.: Interactions of stress and nicotine on amplitude, pre-pulse inhibition and habituation of the acoustic...
  • J.B. Acri

    Nicotine modulates effects of stress on acoustic startle reflexes in ratsDependence on dose, stressor and initial reactivity

    Psychopharmacology (Berlin)

    (1994)
  • J.B. Acri et al.

    Effects of nicotine on the acoustic startle reflex amplitude in rats

    Psychopharmacology (Berlin)

    (1991)
  • J.B. Acri et al.

    Nicotine increases sensory gating measured as inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in rats

    Psychopharmacology (Berlin)

    (1994)
  • B.J. Anthony et al.

    Evidence for sensory-selective set in young infants

    Science

    (1983)
  • B.J. Anthony et al.

    Cardiac and blink reflex concomitants of attentional selectivityA comparison of adults and young children

    Psychophysiology

    (1985)
  • D. Braff et al.

    Prestimulus effects on human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics

    Psychophysiology

    (1978)
  • Brown, K. J.; Klein, L. C.; Rahman, M. A.; Grunberg, N. E.: Acoustic startle responses as predictors of fentanyl...
  • C.C. Chabot et al.

    Circadian modulation of the rat acoustic startle response

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • M. Davis

    The mammalian startle response

  • Cited by (37)

    • Affective and somatic aspects of spontaneous and precipitated nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and BALB/cByJ mice

      2008, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Humans undergoing nicotine withdrawal showed no changes in the acoustic startle response (Kumari and Gray, 1999; Mueller et al., 1998; Postma et al., 2001). Rodent startle studies indicated conflicting results in rats (Acri et al., 1991; Faraday et al., 1999, 1998; Helton et al., 1993). Further, no effects in startle were seen after either acute nicotine administration in C57BL/6 mice (Gould et al., 2005) or during spontaneous nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice (Jonkman et al., 2005; Semenova et al., 2003a).

    • Knockout and knockin mice to investigate the role of nicotinic receptors in the central nervous system

      2004, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This observation, which seems to contradict the wealth of evidence supporting the role of α7∗ nAChRs in attentional processes, should be tempered by the following remarks. Using the PPI paradigm, pharmacological studies performed in humans and animals have been contradictory and failed to establish the role of α7∗ nAChRs in sensory inhibition (Acri et al., 1994; Curzon et al., 1994; but see Decker et al., 1997; Faraday et al., 1998, 1999; Olivier et al., 2001). On the other hand, studies evaluating the extent of sensory inhibition by recording auditory evoked potentials have consistently reported an effect of α7 agonists or antagonists (Luntz-Leybman et al., 1992; Stevens and Wear, 1997; Stevens et al., 1998; Simosky et al., 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text