ArticleNicotine Administration Impairs Sensory Gating in Long–Evans Rats
Section snippets
Subjects
Subjects were 96 male and 96 female Long–Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). During the baseline phase (predrug and prehousing manipulation) all animals were individually housed in standard polypropylene shoebox cages (42 × 20.5 × 20 cm) on hardwood chip bedding (Pine-Dri). Throughout the study animals had continuous access to rodent chow (Harlan Teklad 4% Mouse/Rat Diet 7001) and water. The housing room was maintained at 23°C at 50% relative humidity on a 12-h reverse
Body Weight
Figure 1 presents the body weight data. Nicotine-treated subjects’ body weights increased less over time than did saline-treated subjects’ body weights regardless of sex or phase [during males, F(4, 172) = 37.274, p < 0.05, and females, F(4, 172) = 9.912, p < 0.05; cessation males, F(5, 210) = 17.488, p < 0.05, and females, F(5, 210) = 24.782, p < 0.05]. Grouping also decreased body weight gains over time for all subjects [during males, F(4, 172) = 3.287, p < 0.05, and females, F(4, 172) =
Discussion
The purpose of the present experiment was to examine nicotine’s effects on attention in Long–Evans rats as operationalized in the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the ASR. In previous studies with Sprague–Dawley subjects, nicotine enhanced ASR and PPI 2, 3, 4, 5. This enhancement has been interpreted as analogous to the attentional enhancement demonstrated empirically in certain human subjects and reported by some human smokers when they smoke cigarettes. Results
Acknowledgements
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. This work was supported by USUHS-DoD grant RO72AR.
References (56)
- et al.
Strain and age differences in acoustic startle responses and effects of nicotine in rats
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1995) - et al.
Nicotine’s effects on female rats’ body weightCaloric intake and physical activity
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1986) - et al.
Effects of housing on male and female ratsCrowding stresses males but calms females
Physiol. Behav.
(1995) - et al.
Effects of environmental conditions on food consumption in female and male rats
Physiol. Behav.
(1996) - et al.
Genetic influences on acute responses to nicotine and nicotine tolerance in the mouse
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1988) - et al.
Effect of nicotine, lobeline, and mecamylamine on sensory gating in the rat
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1994) - et al.
Corticosterone reversibly alters brain alpha-bungarotoxin binding and nicotine sensitivity
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1995) The effects of nicotine and cigarette smoking on food consumption and taste preferences
Addict. Behav.
(1982)- et al.
The role of physical activity in nicotine’s effects on body weight
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1985) - et al.
Genetic models for the natural history of smokingEvidence for a genetic influence on smoking persistence
Addict. Behav.
(1993)
Genetics of smokingA brief review
Behav. Ther.
Genetic influences on nicotine responses
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Effects of ddC and AZT on locomotion and acoustic startle IAcute effects in female rats
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Startle response in ratsEffects of ethanol
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
CNS effect of nicotine as the discriminative stimulus for the rat in a T-maze
Life Sci.
Men are more inhibited than women by weak prepulses
Biol. Psychiatry
Neural substrates for the motor-activating properties of psychostimulantsA review of recent findings
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Smoking, nicotine and human performance
Pharmacol. Ther.
Nicotine modulates effects of stress on acoustic startle reflexes in ratsDependence on dose, stressor and initial reactivity
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
Effects of nicotine on the acoustic startle reflex amplitude in rats
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
Nicotine increases sensory gating measured as inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in rats
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
Evidence for sensory-selective set in young infants
Science
Cardiac and blink reflex concomitants of attentional selectivityA comparison of adults and young children
Psychophysiology
Prestimulus effects on human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics
Psychophysiology
Circadian modulation of the rat acoustic startle response
Behav. Neurosci.
The mammalian startle response
Cited by (37)
Affective and somatic aspects of spontaneous and precipitated nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and BALB/cByJ mice
2008, NeuropharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Humans undergoing nicotine withdrawal showed no changes in the acoustic startle response (Kumari and Gray, 1999; Mueller et al., 1998; Postma et al., 2001). Rodent startle studies indicated conflicting results in rats (Acri et al., 1991; Faraday et al., 1999, 1998; Helton et al., 1993). Further, no effects in startle were seen after either acute nicotine administration in C57BL/6 mice (Gould et al., 2005) or during spontaneous nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice (Jonkman et al., 2005; Semenova et al., 2003a).
Inhibitory Gating of Single Unit Activity in Amygdala: Effects of Ketamine, Haloperidol, or Nicotine
2007, Biological PsychiatryEffect of prolonged nicotine infusion on response of rat catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes to restraint and cold stress
2005, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorStrain and sex alter effects of stress and nicotine on feeding, body weight, and HPA axis hormones
2005, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorKnockout and knockin mice to investigate the role of nicotinic receptors in the central nervous system
2004, Progress in Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :This observation, which seems to contradict the wealth of evidence supporting the role of α7∗ nAChRs in attentional processes, should be tempered by the following remarks. Using the PPI paradigm, pharmacological studies performed in humans and animals have been contradictory and failed to establish the role of α7∗ nAChRs in sensory inhibition (Acri et al., 1994; Curzon et al., 1994; but see Decker et al., 1997; Faraday et al., 1998, 1999; Olivier et al., 2001). On the other hand, studies evaluating the extent of sensory inhibition by recording auditory evoked potentials have consistently reported an effect of α7 agonists or antagonists (Luntz-Leybman et al., 1992; Stevens and Wear, 1997; Stevens et al., 1998; Simosky et al., 2001).