Cell Adhesion Molecules during Inner Ear and Hair Cell Development, Including Notch and Its Ligands

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(03)57011-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The vertebrate inner ear develops from a population of placodally derived epithelial cells that initially invaginate to form the otocyst. As development continues, subsets of cells within this population become specified to develop as specific structures within the ear. Subsequently, individual cells undergo morphogenetic and differentiative changes related to the development of specific regions of the ear. The factors that regulate the different developmental events that are required for formation of a complete inner ear are still not completely understood. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that cell–cell adhesion and cell adhesion molecules may play key roles in several aspects of inner ear development.

This chapter summarizes the molecular attributes of the known families of cell adhesion molecules and reviews the existing knowledge about the role of cell adhesion in inner ear development. The roles of cell adhesion in regionalization of the otocyst, cellular differentiation, and neurite extension are reviewed. In addition, the recently demonstrated role of a subset of adhesion molecules, although not necessarily cell–cell adhesion itself, in the development and orientation of hair cell stereociliary bundles is discussed. The role of adhesion molecules in stereociliary bundle development is even more intriguing in light of the fact that many of these molecules were identified as genetic mutations that lead to non-syndromic forms of deafness. These results highlight the importance of adhesion molecules in inner ear development and suggest that the developmental challenges that exist within the inner ear may have resulted in the development of novel functions for adhesion molecules.

Introduction

The vertebrate inner ear is composed of a diverse group of complex structures that includes the semicircular canals, endolymphatic duct, vestibular and auditory sensory epithelia, nonsensory epithelial regions, and vestibular and auditory ganglia. Virtually all of the cells that give rise to these structures derive from the population of epithelial cells that initially comprise the otocyst. During the course of embryogenesis, cells located within the otocyst will be influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors that will regulate multiple aspects of the development of these cells, including cellular proliferation, progressive restriction and ultimate determination of cell fate and differentiation, complex morphogenetic changes, and apoptotic cell death. Despite the recent increase in the number of publications examining different aspects of the development of the inner ear, our understanding of the factors that regulate and coordinate the generation of this elaborate structure is still in its infancy.

A key factor in the formation of any epithelial structure is the ability of individual cells to form adhesive contacts with other cells and with the underlying extracellular matrix. Such adhesive contacts obviously play key roles in the development of specific three-dimensional structures, but more recent results have suggested that cell–cell and cell–basement membrane interactions can also signal within specific cells through the activation of intracellular cascades to initiate cellular responses, including proliferation, determination of cell fate, differentiation, morphogenesis, and both intra- and inter-cellular fasciculation. Classically, cell–cell adhesive interactions were thought to be mediated by either calcium-dependent cadherins or calcium–independent cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), whereas cell–basement membrane interactions were mediated by integrins. However, more recent studies have expanded the spectrum of molecules that can regulate cell adhesion to include claudins, desmosomal cadherins, and protocadherins. Not surprisingly, cell–cell adhesion and adhesion molecules have been shown to play a role in the development of a functional auditory system. But our understanding of the comprehensive role of adhesion in the different steps that must occur between otocyst and mature inner ear is still extremely limited. In this chapter, I will briefly summarize the different families of molecules that have been shown to play a role in cell adhesion and then review the existing data on the role of adhesion in the development of different aspects of the inner ear.

Section snippets

Cell Adhesion Molecules

The first family of molecules shown to play a role in cell adhesion was the immunoglobulin-related CAMs (Brackenbury 1977, Cunningham 1987). Since that time, more than 1000 papers, including many excellent reviews, have been published examining different aspects of cellular adhesion and CAM expression and function. Therefore, only a brief overview of different CAMs will be presented here. CAMs are transmembrane proteins that are characterized by the presence of structural motifs that were first

Expression of Adhesion Molecules in the Otocyst

The inner ear develops from the otic placode, a thickened region of cranial ectoderm, that invaginates to form an otic cup and ultimately pinches off from the surface ectoderm to form an otic vesicle (Rinkwitz 2001, Bryant 2002). Once the vesicle is formed, an elaborate series of morphogenetic changes lead to the development of all the different epithelial and afferent neuronal structures within the ear. It has been suggested that the positions of specific sensory patches or structures may be

Adhesion Molecules and Development of Stereocilia Bundles

Perhaps one of the most surprising discoveries related to the role of adhesion molecules and development of the inner ear arose from reverse genetic analysis of deaf mouse mutants. In 2001, the waltzer and Ames waltzer strains of mice, each of which include both hearing and balance disorders, were determined to be caused by mutations in cadherin 23 (Cdh23) and protocadherin 15 (Pcdh15), respectively (DiPalma et al., 2001; Williams 1988, Alagramam 2001, Alagramam 2001; Alagramam et al., 2001a).

Summary

Cellular adhesion plays a key role in a number of unique developmental events, including proliferation, cell fate, morphogenesis, neurite outgrowth, fasciculation, and synaptogensis. The number of families of molecules that can mediate cell adhesion and the number of members of each of those families has continued to increase over time. Moreover, the potential for the formation of different pairs of heterodimers with different binding specificities, and for both homo- and hetero-dimeric

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Dr. Mireille Montcouquiol for reading an earlier version of the manuscript and Dr. Pamela Lanford for helpful conversations on the role of notch and adhesion. Supported by funds from the Intramural Program at NIDCD⧸NIH.

References (187)

  • M. Bronner-Fraser et al.

    Effects of antibodies against N-cadherin and N-CAM on the cranial neural crest and neural tube

    Dev. Biol.

    (1992)
  • P.J. Bryant et al.

    Mutations at the fat locus interfere with cell proliferation control and epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Dev. Biol.

    (1988)
  • F.R. Burns et al.

    DM-GRASP, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily axonal surface protein that supports neurite extension

    Neuron

    (1991)
  • G.J. Cole et al.

    Characterization of a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that copurifies with the neural cell adhesion molecule

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1989)
  • C.H. Damsky et al.

    Integrin signaling: It's where the action is

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (2002)
  • A.P. DeBernardo et al.

    Native and recombinant DM-GRASP selectively support neurite extension from neurons that express GRASP

    Dev. Biol.

    (1995)
  • P. Doherty et al.

    Neurite outgrowth in response to transfected N-CAM changes during development and is modulated by polysialic acid

    Neuron

    (1990)
  • P. Doherty et al.

    Morphoregulatory activities of NCAM and N-cadherin can be accounted for by G protein-dependent activation of L- and N-type neuronal Ca2+ channels

    Cell

    (1991)
  • P. Doherty et al.

    A soluble chimeric form of the L1 glycoprotein stimulates neurite outgrowth

    Neuron

    (1995)
  • J. Drazba et al.

    The role of cell adhesion molecules in neurite outgrowth on Muller cells

    Dev. Biol.

    (1990)
  • S. Etienne-Manneville et al.

    Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCzeta

    Cell

    (2001)
  • R.G. Fehon et al.

    Molecular interactions between the protein products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, two EGF-homologous genes in Drosophila

    Cell

    (1990)
  • D.M. Fekete et al.

    Revisiting cell fate specification in the inner ear

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2002)
  • R.J. Fleming

    Structural conservation of Notch receptors and ligands

    Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.

    (1998)
  • C.J. Formstone et al.

    The flamingo-related mouse Celsr family (Celsr1-3) genes exhibit distinct patterns of expression during embryonic development

    Mech. Dev.

    (2001)
  • M. Frank et al.

    Protocadherins

    Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.

    (2002)
  • A.J. Furley et al.

    The axonal glycoprotein TAG-1 is an immunoglobulin superfamily member with neurite outgrowth-promoting activity

    Cell

    (1990)
  • C.J. Gottardi et al.

    Adhesion signaling: How beta-catenin interacts with its partners

    Curr. Biol.

    (2001)
  • T.A. Haag et al.

    The role of cell adhesion molecules in Drosophila heart morphogenesis: faint sausage, shotgun⧸DE-cadherin, and laminin A are required for discrete stages in heart development

    Dev. Biol.

    (1999)
  • L. Hackett et al.

    E-cadherin and the differentiation of mammalian vestibular hair cells

    Exp. Cell. Res.

    (2002)
  • A.K. Hadjantonakis et al.

    Celsr1, a neural-specific gene encoding an unusual seven-pass transmembrane receptor, maps to mouse chromosome 15 and human chromosome 22qter

    Genomics

    (1997)
  • A.K. Hadjantonakis et al.

    mCelsr1 is an evolutionarily conserved seven-pass transmembrane receptor and is expressed during mouse embryonic development

    Mech. Dev.

    (1998)
  • M.A. Heggem et al.

    The cytoplasmic domain of Xenopus NF-protocadherin interacts with TAF1⧸set

    Dev. Cell

    (2003)
  • C.A. Henry et al.

    Roles for zebrafish focal adhesion kinase in notochord and somite morphogenesis

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • R. Homayouni et al.

    Disabled-1 interacts with a novel developmentally regulated protocadherin

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2001)
  • S.H. Hrynkow et al.

    Multiple roles of neural cell adhesion molecule, neural cell adhesion molecule-polysialic acid, and L1 adhesion molecules during sensory innervation of the otic epithelium in vitro

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • S.H. Hrynkow et al.

    Spatio-temporal diversity in the microenvironments for neural cell adhesion molecule, neural cell adhesion molecule-polysialic acid, and L1-cell adhesion molecule expression by sensory neurons and their targets during cochleo-vestibular innervation

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • M. Itoh et al.

    Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta

    Dev. Cell

    (2003)
  • I.G. Johnston et al.

    Molecular cloning of SC1: A putative brain extracellular matrix glycoprotein showing partial similarity to osteonectin⧸BM40⧸SPARC

    Neuron

    (1990)
  • Y. Kimura et al.

    Cadherin-11 expressed in association with mesenchymal morphogenesis in the head, somite, and limb bud of early mouse embryos

    Dev. Biol.

    (1995)
  • N. Kohmura et al.

    Diversity revealed by a novel family of cadherins expressed in neurons at a synaptic complex

    Neuron

    (1998)
  • U. Laessing et al.

    Molecular characterization of fish neurolin: A growth-associated cell surface protein and member of the immunoglobulin superfamily in the fish retinotectal system with similarities to chick protein DM-GRASP⧸SC-1⧸BEN

    Differentiation

    (1994)
  • J. Adam et al.

    Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development

    Development

    (1998)
  • K.N. Alagramam et al.

    The mouse Ames waltzer hearing-loss mutant is caused by mutation of Pcdh15, a novel protocadherin gene

    Nat. Genet.

    (2001)
  • K.N. Alagramam et al.

    Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F

    Hum. Mol. Genet.

    (2001)
  • C. Aletsee et al.

    The disintegrin kistrin inhibits neurite extension from spiral ganglion explants cultured on laminin

    Audiol. Neurootol.

    (2001)
  • M. Anniko et al.

    Genesis and maturation of vestibular hair cells

    Adv. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (1997)
  • F. Appel et al.

    Identification of the border between fibronectin type III homologous repeats 2 and 3 of the neural cell adhesion molecule L1 as a neurite outgrowth promoting and signal transducing domain

    J. Neurobiol.

    (1995)
  • H. Asou

    Monoclonal antibody that recognizes the carbohydrate portion of cell adhesion molecule L1 influences calcium current in cultured neurons

    J. Cell Physiol.

    (1992)
  • L. Bally-Cuif et al.

    The mouse NCAM gene displays a biphasic expression pattern during neural tube development

    Development

    (1993)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Paraquat initially damages cochlear support cells leading to anoikis-like hair cell death

      2018, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dislocation of the OHC rows suggested that PQ might disrupt the intercellular adhesion proteins that anchor the OHCs and IHCs to neighboring supporting cells (SCs). The cell adhesion molecules and intercellular connections also provide important signals for cell growth, cell fate, differentiation and survival (Kelley, 2003; Shi et al., 2014; Simonneau et al., 2003). Detachment of cells from their neighbors can trigger a novel form of cell death known as anoikis; detachment-mediated apoptosis normally prevents cancer cells from metastasizing (Frisch and Ruoslahti, 1997; Frisch and Screaton, 2001; Liotta and Kohn, 2004; Reddig and Juliano, 2005; Valentijn et al., 2004).

    • Making connections in the inner ear: Recent insights into the development of spiral ganglion neurons and their connectivity with sensory hair cells

      2013, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given that the Ephs and ephrins can signal uni-directionally or bi-directionally [70], and that their expression patterns in the cochlea are often overlapping, it seems that we are only at the starting point of understanding how these factors may precisely guide SGNs to their hair cell targets. In addition, there are a variety of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed in the cochlea [71–73], which are well known in axon guidance, as well as a variety of extracellular matrix factors that may provide preferential substrates for growing SGNs [74,75]. Also, morphogens such as members of the Wnt, FGF, Hedgehog, and TGFβ families, which are also known to exert guidance effects on growing axons (for reviews, see [76–78]), are also expressed and function within the developing cochlea [3].

    • Inner ear supporting cells: Rethinking the silent majority

      2013, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As discussed above, differentiating hair cells prevent neighboring precursor cells from becoming hair cells through notch signaling; these precursors then assume a supporting cell fate. Therefore, the invariant segregation of hair cells and supporting cells is regulated by lateral inhibition [43]. Genetic ablation of the notch ligand, jagged2, results in increased numbers of hair cells in the organ of Corti but only partially disrupts cellular patterning [44].

    • Keynote review: The auditory system, hearing loss and potential targets for drug development

      2005, Drug Discovery Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Proliferation and differentiation are not necessarily separate processes, although hair cells and supporting cells can clearly differentiate in the absence of p27kip1, p19ink4d and Rb1. The selection of neuroblasts from the early otic epithelium, the development of prosensory epithelial patches and the selection of hair cells and supporting cells from within a sensory patch are regulated by notch signaling [67,109–111]. It is possible that the key to regeneration lies in stimulating proliferation and relying on endogenous interactions between notch receptors and their ligands to select an appropriate pattern of hair cells and supporting cells.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text