Brightness induction by local contrast and the spatial dependence of assimilation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(88)80012-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Two mechanisms of brightness perception (1) brightness induction by local contrast and (2) assimilation, were examined for a variety of visual stimuli. Local contrast is the primary determinant of brightness perception, making objects appear brighter on a background of lower luminance and darker on a background of greater luminance. Assimilation is the opposite effect, whereby objects on a brighter (but not necessarily more luminant) background appear brighter or on a dark background appear darker. We have compared the relative strength of the two effects using stimuli which permit them to be studied separately. Brightness induction by local contrast is quantitatively stronger in all situations. Further, the strength of assimilation is strongly dependent on spatial parameters in the visual scene. These results are shown to be true both for simple visual stimuli as well as for complicated Mondrian-like patterns. The Retinex theory of brightness perception predicts that the two effects are equal. Our results show a range of relative strengths (assimilation vs brightness induction due to contrast) from 0.59 to 0.63 at 5′ down to 0.34 at 43′.

References (32)

  • ShapleyR.

    The importance of contrast for the activity of single neurons, the VEP and perception

    Vision Res.

    (1986)
  • ShapleyR. et al.

    Visual adaptation and retinal gain-controls

    Prog. Retinal Res.

    (1984)
  • AllmanJ. et al.

    Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons

    Ann. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1985)
  • AlpernM. et al.

    The additivity of contrast in the human eye

    J. gen. Physiol.

    (1959)
  • ArendL.E. et al.

    Difference information in brightness perception

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1971)
  • BrainardD.H. et al.

    Analysis of the retinex theory of color vision

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1986)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1968)
  • De MonasterioF.M. et al.

    Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1975)
  • FryG.A. et al.

    The effect of a peripheral glare source upon the apparent brightness of an object

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1953)
  • CornsweetT.
  • GilchristA.L.

    When does perceived brightness depend on spatial arrangement?

    percept Psychophys.

    (1980)
  • GrahamN.

    Spatial frequency channels is human vision: detecting edges without edge detectors

  • HeinemannE.G.

    Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances

    J. exp. Psychol

    (1955)
  • HeinemannE.G.

    Simultaneous brightness induction

  • HelsonH.

    Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1963)
  • HurvichL.
  • Cited by (87)

    • Shadow induction on optical see-through head-mounted displays

      2020, Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Brightness induction is a general term for the phenomena that the perceived brightness of a region is modulated by the surrounding pattern. By making the surrounding area brighter or darker, it is possible to make the perceived brightness appear darker or lighter, respectively, than the original luminance [12]. This effect has been confirmed not only in experimental environments but also in real environments [13,14].

    • The phantom illusion

      2015, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A different neural model of lightness computation, based on the principle of edge integration, was proposed by Rudd (2010) to account for the assimilation effects that he observed in his experiments with disk-ring displays (Fig. 7). The edge integration model assumes that the lightness of the target disk in a disk-ring display is computed from a weighted sum of the directed luminance steps evaluated at the inner and outer edges of the annular surround (see also Reid & Shapley, 1988; Shapley & Reid, 1985), The directed luminance step at the inner edge of the ring (i.e. the disk-ring edge) exerts a contrast effect on the disk lightness, while the directed luminance step at the remote outer edge of the ring (the ring-background edge) exerts an additional effect on the disk lightness that can have the sign of contrast or assimilation, depending on the direction of the remote luminance step (for the stimulus in Fig. 7, the luminance step in the direction of the target is negative sign of the induction effect from this edge is one of contrast). When the outer edge instead produces an assimilation effect, the magnitude of the assimilation effects tends to be weaker than the contrast effect produced by the disk-ring edge because the outer ring edge is further from the target.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text