Low frequency noise in 0.12 μm partially and fully depleted SOI technology

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00279-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Low frequency noise characterization of 0.12 μm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) CMOS technology is for the first time performed for partially and fully depleted N-MOSFETs. Static performances of the experimental devices are first presented, then we address the drain current fluctuations in both linear and saturation regimes. Taking into consideration the usually admitted 1/f noise models in MOS devices and their applicability in our case, we point out an enhancement of the extracted trap densities for both architectures compared to previously obtained results in 0.25 μm SOI CMOS technology. As regards drain current spectral densities in saturation mode, we notice some peculiarities occurring for the Kink-related excess noise.

Introduction

Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) devices have shown over the last past years promising advantages over the Si bulk technology, especially for low power/low voltage integrated circuits due to significantly improved electrical properties such as increased driving current, lower parasitic source/drain capacitances and total dielectric isolation. Two device architectures have consequently gained a growing interest beside semiconductor suppliers: fully depleted (FD) and partially depleted (PD) MOSFETs which both present some special peculiarities [1], [2], [3] due to the presence of a buried oxide layer. As far as PD devices are concerned, they exhibit floating body effects such as the Kink effect, parasitic bipolar transistor, etc… Indeed, the neutral zone within the silicon film attracts holes issued from the impact ionization occurring at the drain edge, and the body potential consequently increases, which contributes to a decrease of the threshold voltage, and a drain current increase (Kink effect). If the body potential is large enough, the source-to-body junction is forward biased, activating the parasitic bipolar transistor action. Regarding the FD architecture, the most relevant point to figure out is the interface coupling effects between the front and back gates due to a reduced silicon film thickness (30 nm in this study). This means that the electrical properties (such as the threshold voltage, the subthreshold slope…) at one interface are dependent from the applied biases at the opposite interface [4].

Low frequency noise analysis in MOSFETs is a relevant characterization tool, and provides pertinent information about the maturity level and the evaluation of a given technology. Shrinking MOS devices to very deep-submicron dimensions, an increase of the overall 1/f noise may alter device performances in terms of analogue or digital circuit applications, and needs to be investigated. Up to now, 1/f noise on 0.25 μm SOI N-MOSFETs has been extensively studied in the literature for both PD and FD architectures [5], [6], but, to our knowledge, only a few results [7] have been already reported on 0.12 μm PD SOI CMOS technology. Nevertheless, this is a rather important study to carry out, in order to see if the existing noise models [8] are still suitable, and to evaluate the impact of scaling down on low frequency noise levels.

After having considered the transfer and output characteristics, we present the normalized drain current power spectral densities in the linear regime (Vd=50 mV) for both PD and FD N-MOSFETs. Then, in the saturation regime, we focus on the presence or absence of the conventional Kink-related excess noise for PD devices, whereas we also show the appearance of a Kink excess noise for FD devices, already observed in 0.25 μm moderately FD N-MOSFETs [9], but for higher frequencies.

Section snippets

Experimental details

As regards PD devices, two technologies were used in this study: 0.13 μm (Lpoly) devices processed on Unibond substrates at IMEC (Leuven, Belgium) and 0.12 μm (Lpoly) devices (also on Unibond substrates) provided by STMicroelectronics (Crolles, France). Front oxide thickness was Tox1=2.5 nm for IMEC devices (resp. Tox1=2 nm for STMicroelectronics ones), silicon film thickness TSi=100 nm for IMEC devices (resp. TSi=150 nm for STMicroelectronics ones), and back oxide thickness Tox2=400 nm. IMEC

Static characteristics

In this section are reported the transfer and output characteristics of both PD and FD devices. Fig. 2 shows the transfer characteristics Id (Vg1) for W/L=10/0.12 and 10/0.13 μm PD N-MOSFETs with Vd=50 mV. A lower extrapolated threshold voltage (not shown here) for 0.12 μm N-MOSFETs is obtained, which results from different channel doping and architecture between the two provided technologies. Similar subthreshold behaviour is nevertheless noticed for our devices, and we extracted a

Low frequency noise characterization

We will now consider low frequency noise measurements carried out for PD and FD devices in both linear and saturation regimes to identify the main noise sources as well as to calculate the trap densities at the front gate oxide interface.

Conclusion

Low frequency noise in both PD and FD N-MOSFETs was presented for the 0.12 μm SOI CMOS technology node. An enhancement of the overall noise level is noticeable compared to previously obtained results on the 0.25 μm SOI CMOS node. In linear regime, the noise source was attributed to carrier number fluctuations. Trap densities of a few 1018/eV/cm3 were calculated. As regards PD devices, the Kink-related excess noise magnitude is reduced, especially in terms of Lorentzian-like spectra and corner

Acknowledgements

This work was supplied within the SATURN IST 105 21 European research project on SOI devices. The author would like to thank Dr. Christine Raynaud from STMicroelectronics (Crolles, France), Dr. Kristin De Meyer and Dr. Hans Van Meer from IMEC (Leuven, Belgium) for providing the devices used in this study.

References (17)

  • E. Simoen et al.

    The low frequency noise behaviour of SOI technologies

    Solid State Electron.

    (1996)
  • S. Christensson

    Low-frequency noise in MOS transistors

    Solid State Electron.

    (1968)
  • X. Li et al.

    1/f noise in series resistance of LDD MOSTs

    Solid. State. Electron.

    (1992)
  • Pelella MM et al. Advantages and challenges of high performance CMOS on SOI, IEEE Int. SOI Conference, Proceedings,...
  • Shahidi G. Mainstreaming of the SOI technology. In: ESSDERC’1999, Proceedings, Leuven, September 1999. p....
  • F. Balestra

    Performance and physical mechanisms in deep submicron SOI MOSFETs

    Electron. Technol.

    (1999)
  • H.K. Lim et al.

    Threshold voltage of thin-film silicon-on-insulator (SOI) MOSFETs

    IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev.

    (1983)
  • Haendler S et al. Comparative low-frequency noise analysis in various SOI devices: floating body, body-tied, DTMOS with...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • Improved analysis and modeling of low-frequency noise in nanoscale MOSFETs

    2012, Solid-State Electronics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The charge fluctuations in the gate dielectric could also induce fluctuations of the carrier mobility, giving rise to the so-called correlated mobility fluctuations (CMF) [17,18]. In thin-film transistors [1–3], as well as in single-gate MOSFETs, double-gate MOSFETs and FinFETs [4–13], it has been established that the 1/f noise mostly originates from CMF due to trapping–detrapping of channel carriers into slow gate dielectric traps. With scaling down the device dimensions, the gate dielectric thickness becomes as small as nanometer, with the surface roughness playing important role on the drain current fluctuations [19].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text