Reoperation for Hirschsprung's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90247-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Reoperation for Hirschsprung's disease traditionally has been used for patients with anastomotic leaks or stricture or with severe constipation from retained aganglionic segment or neuronal dysplasia, but there is little information regarding its use for other complications and the long-term outcome in these patients.

Methods: In a 23-year period, 107 infants and children underwent Soave (68 patients) or Duhamel (39 patients) pull-through procedures. The age at operation was newborn to 6 years (mean, 10 months). Eighty percent had aganglionosis limited to the rectosigmoid colon. Follow-up was by office visit or telephone (mean, 8.5 years).

Results: Twenty-three of the 68 patients with Soave pull-through (34%) underwent reoperation for intractable enterocolitis (10 patients, all 10 cured); anastomotic stenosis (four patients, three cured, one continued diversion); anastomotic leak (four patients, four cured); retained aganglionic segment (three patients, three cured); one necrosis of pull-through converted to Duhamel and cured; and one rectal prolapse that was diverted. Fifteen of the 39 patients with Duhamel procedure (38%) underwent reoperation for severe constipation (seven patients, six cured, one diverted); persistent rectal septum (four patients, 4 cured); and intractable enterocolitis (four patients, three cured, one diverted). Overall, 21 of 23 patients (91%) with reoperation after Soave procedures were cured, whereas 13 of 15 patients (87%) who underwent reoperation after Duhamel procedure were cured, and four patients remain diverted.

Conclusions: These data show that aggressive reoperation can result in a high cure rate in Hirschsprung's disease. Although there is no significant difference in the rate of reoperation after Duhamel and Soave procedures, the patients with Soave pull-through required more complex reoperations, with several requiring more than one procedure. An aggressive approach to reoperation in patients with Hirschsprung's disease clearly is justified.

Cited by (46)

  • The anal canal is the fine line between “fecal incontinence and colitis” after a pull-through for Hirschsprung disease

    2017, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    This patient is fecal incontinent. When there are residual aganglionosis and the anal canal is preserved, but there is a very short rectum, the Duhamel technique is a suitable method for a reoperation to avoid a low anastomosis over the anal canal and produce fecal incontinence [17–20]. In the group of patients with fecal incontinence, the histopathology in the rectal biopsy of the colon anastomosed in the “anal canal” is aganglionic in 3 patients and transitional zone in 2.

  • A new technique for redo operation after failed endoanal pull-through procedure for correction of Hirschsprung's disease

    2014, Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, it is important to stress that in the three patients herein described, a huge colonic dilatation was noted in the contrast enema, with clinical intractability, no body weight gain, and frequent necessity of manual fecaloma remotion under general anesthesia. The main post-operative complications of TEPT procedure are due to anastomotic strictures, fistulas and incomplete colon resection in cases of pull-through of the transition zone, as shown by some recent revisions [7,10,11]. Diagnosis confirmation using histological analysis of the pulled-through area is always necessary [15].

  • Redo pull-through in Hirschprung's disease for obstructive symptoms due to residual aganglionosis and transition zone bowel

    2011, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Intestinal neuronal dysplasia (IND) [27] is frequently reported as responsible for the persistence of obstructive symptoms after an HD pull-through [28,29]. Yet others have found that IND is rarely associated with the problems that occur after the pull-through [1,7,30]. We suspect that many interpretations of IND are actually transition-zone pathology in HD [30] and would advocate for a reanalysis of these specimens with this concept of transition zone in mind.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Hilton Head, South Carolina, May 10–13, 1998.

View full text