The significance of monazite U–Th–Pb age data in metamorphic assemblages; a combined study of monazite and garnet chronometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00212-0Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, a coupled U–Th–Pb isotopic and EMP chemical study was carried out in situ on monazite (micro-inclusions within garnet as well as matrix grains) from rocks recovered from two chronologically well-constrained areas of the Himalayan orogen. Monazite inclusions within garnets from three samples yield ages of ∼44–36 Ma, whereas matrix grains within one sample are typically younger (30–26 Ma). Y depletion of these younger matrix grains indicates that they grew after garnet had crystallised. The recognition of episodic monazite growth during regional metamorphism, first at greenschist facies (before garnet growth) and secondly at upper amphibolite facies (post-dating garnet growth), allows relative growth ages of the occluding garnet to be calculated. These are in excellent agreement with Sm–Nd garnet ages from surrounding units. This approach not only provides a ready means of obtaining porphyroblast growth ages but also allows the combination of precise U–Th–Pb data from metamorphic monazite with thermobarometric information obtained from rock-forming minerals.

Introduction

Of the U–Th-rich accessory phases commonly used in geochronology, monazite is perhaps the most useful for determining the timing of metamorphism in amphibolite and higher grade granitic and pelitic rocks (e.g. [1], [2]). This light rare earth elements (LREEs) phosphate is a relatively common accessory mineral in a variety of rock types [3], [4], usually has high concentrations of U and Th, and typically has minimal concentrations of common Pb [4]. These characteristics coupled with a minor risk of isotopic inheritance [4] and a high resistance to Pb loss [4], [5] have led to the growing use of monazite as a chronological tool in metamorphic rocks (e.g. [6]). However, unlike common rock-forming minerals such as garnet, the metamorphic reactions responsible for the formation and breakdown of such accessory phases are poorly understood, despite numerous studies over the last decade (e.g. [7] and references therein). It is, therefore, difficult to combine the precise chronological information provided by monazite with the pressure–temperature determinations of rock-forming minerals. Thus, despite its chronological utility, the application of metamorphic monazite U–Th–Pb dating to geological problems is severely limited, and will remain so until reactions responsible for the breakdown and formation of monazite are not only recognised but also calibrated in pressure–temperature space.

In this contribution, we apply secondary ion mass spectrometry techniques to provide in situ U–Th–Pb isotopic measurements of monazites, both included within garnet porphyroblasts and in the matrix of a rock. This approach has the enormous advantage over conventional U–Th–Pb investigations, or more traditional ion probe techniques, in that the textural relationships of monazite are retained. Although the technique has been used before [8], this contribution involves several novel and important advances. Firstly, we present a full U–Th–Pb dataset for the analysed monazites so that we are not reliant simply on 207Pb–206Pb [8], [9] or 232Th–208Pb ages [10]. This approach allows us to apply the critical test of concordancy to our data. Secondly, we also present estimates of the timing of local garnet growth, independently established using Sm–Nd chronometry (this study, [11]). We are thus able to demonstrate, for the first time, that the ages of monazite inclusions in garnet are similar to, or slightly older than, the occluding porphyroblast. As a result, we can combine precise U–Th–Pb ages on monazite inclusions with thermobarometric data from garnet. Finally, we show that matrix monazites commonly yield more variable and younger ages than the included grains. By integrating detailed REE and trace element data with textural observations, we are able to distinguish several growth phases of monazite during regional metamorphism and estimate the conditions under which this growth occurred.

Section snippets

Geological setting

The samples for this study come from the Garhwal region of the Central Himalaya of India, and from the Nanga Parbat Haramosh Massif (NPHM), in the Pakistan Himalaya. Both areas lie within the metamorphic core of the Himalayan orogen, and both have experienced extensive prograde metamorphism, deformation and melting (e.g. [12], [13]) as a result of the Cretaceous/late Eocene collision between India and Asia [14], [15].

Samples 97g74, 97g100×, 97g97 and 97g98 were recovered from the eastern margin

Sample descriptions

Samples 97g100×, 97g98, 97g97 and 97g74 are typical of the garnet–kyanite schists that characterise the cover metasediments of the NPHM [12], [18]. They all contain the assemblage garnet, plagioclase feldspar, muscovite, biotite, kyanite and quartz, with accessory phases of rutile, tourmaline, apatite and rarely allanite; 97g74 is unique in also containing accessory monazite and lacking apatite. Garnets in samples 97g98 and 97g100× are typically around 5 mm in diameter, whereas those in 97g97

Analytical techniques

U–Th–Pb isotopic measurements were carried out in situ on polished probe sections of samples 97g74, G57 and G90 using the Sensitive High Resolution Ion MicroProbe (SHRIMP-2) at Curtin University, Western Australia. BSE observations, EDS and reflected-light microscopy carried out on the same probe sections allowed the recognition and mapping of monazite micro-inclusions both within garnet porphyroblasts and in the matrix of each sample. Monazite grains as small as 10 μm diameter were targeted,

EMP study

A complete set of results is given in the EPSL Online Background Dataset1 associated with this contribution. The important results for this study are shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3. In each sample, matrix and included monazites share many chemical characteristics. However, in all three samples, Y concentrations, and hence HREE concentrations, are typically lower in the matrix grains. In addition, in sample G90,

Thermobarometry

In order to place the monazite age and chemical data presented above in a thermobarometric framework, the pressure–temperature evolution of the rocks needs to be established. Of particular interest here is the thermal history of the rock during the period of garnet growth and, hence, the occlusion of the dated monazite inclusions. In the ensuing thermobarometric calculations, the internally consistent dataset of Holland and Powell [25] is used throughout.

The pressure and temperature of garnet

Relative ages of porphyroblast phases

The general concordance between the U and Th isotopic systems of the majority of included monazites in these samples is consistent with monazite growth at around 45–38 Ma in 97g74 and 44–36 Ma in G90 and G57. The main advantage of in situ isotopic analysis is that accessory phase textural relationships are retained. In this study, we can use this textural information to deduce that monazite included in garnet grew before or synchronously with this rock-forming mineral. If the monazite

Conclusions

This study illustrates that metamorphic monazite, much like any other metamorphic mineral, undergoes a complex growth history during regional metamorphism. Until a full understanding of the reactions responsible for its growth and breakdown is recognised, the true power of metamorphic monazite U–Th–Pb chronometry will not be realised. However, in this contribution, we demonstrate that, by retaining the textural relationships of monazites relative to major fabric-forming phases through the

Supplementary data

. Background Dataset 1. EMP analyses of matrix and included monazites from samples 97g74, G57 and G90.

. Background Dataset 2. U-Th-Pb isotopic data for monazites from samples 97g74, G90 and G57.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the NERC. Andy Tindle is thanked for his help with the EMP analyses and Felix Oberli for assistance with Sm–Nd mass spectrometry. Two highly constructive reviews by Frank Spear and Randy Parrish significantly improved this manuscript.[RV]

References (43)

  • F.S. Spear et al.

    Petrology and cooling rates of the Valhalla Complex, British-Columbia, Canada

    J. Petrol.

    (1996)
  • F. Finger et al.

    Replacement of primary monazite by apatite–allanite–epidote coronas in an amphibolite facies granite gneiss from the eastern Alps

    Am. Mineral.

    (1998)
  • W.C. Overstreet

    The geological occurrence of monazite

    US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap.

    (1967)
  • R.R. Parrish

    U–Pb dating of monazite and its application to geological problems

    Can. J. Earth Sci.

    (1990)
  • R.R. Parrish

    Thermal evolution of the southeastern Canadian Cordillera

    Can. J. Earth Sci.

    (1995)
  • X.K. Zhu et al.

    Lewisian crustal history from in situ SIMS mineral chronometry and related metamorphic textures

    Chem. Geol.

    (1997)
  • C.I. Prince, J. Kosler, D. Gunther, D. Vance and N.B.W. Harris, Comparison of laser ablation ICP-MS and isotope...
  • G. Foster, The pre-Neogene thermal history of the Nanga Parbat Haramosh Massif and the NW Himalaya, Ph.D., The Open...
  • M.P. Searle et al.

    Age of crustal melting, emplacement and exhumation history of the Shivling leucogranite, Garhwal Himalaya

    Geol. Mag.

    (1999)
  • C.T. Klootwijk et al.

    An early India-Asia contact – paleomagnetic constraints from Ninetyeast ridge, ODP Leg 121

    Geology

    (1992)
  • A. Whittington et al.

    Lithostratigraphic correlations in the western Himalaya – An isotopic approach

    Geology

    (1999)
  • Cited by (300)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text