Elsevier

Corrosion Science

Volume 45, Issue 5, May 2003, Pages 941-955
Corrosion Science

Electrochemical noise analysis: detection of electrode asymmetry

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00179-8Get rights and content

Abstract

One major application of electrochemical noise (EN) analysis for corrosion studies is the estimation of corrosion rate via impedance measurement. The measurement involves coupling two electrodes, whereupon the associated EN is measured and the noise resistance and the spectral noise impedance are computed. However, the two electrodes are required to be “nominally identical” (i.e. symmetrical) for the noise resistance and spectral impedance techniques to be valid. This paper proposes that the correlation between the measured potential and the current noise can be used to detect an asymmetric electrode pair and thus provides a necessary but not sufficient test for electrode symmetry. The potential/current coefficient of correlation is derived based on an equivalent circuit to demonstrate the concept and experimental data is presented to support the theory.

Introduction

Electrochemical noise (EN) refers to the spontaneous fluctuations in potential (electrochemical potential noise, EPN) that can be observed on a corroding metal (electrode) and/or the spontaneous fluctuations in current (electrochemical current noise, ECN) when the electrode is externally polarized, either by a potentiostat or by another electrode.

Eden et al. [1] proposed an experimental setup for measuring EN that enables quantities known as the noise resistance and the spectral noise impedance to be computed. These quantities have been linked to the electrochemical equivalent impedance of the electrodes [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], which can provide much valuable information regarding the corrosion process and, in particular, the rate of corrosion [7], [8]. Bertocci et al. [9], and Mansfeld and co-workers [10], [11] have observed good experimental correlation between the spectral noise impedance and the magnitude of the electrode impedance determined by AC polarization techniques. The noise resistance and spectral noise impedance have been shown to be helpful in corrosion studies in many practical research cases [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

Fig. 1 shows the measurement setup proposed by Eden et al. [1]. Two electrodes are electrically coupled via an ammeter so that the ECN flowing between them, i(t), can be logged. Simultaneous to the ECN measurement, the EPN at the point of coupling, v(t), is logged with respect to a reference electrode. This measurement setup will be referred to as a noise resistance measurement or an EPN/ECN measurement.

The noise resistance is defined by Eden et al. [1] asRn=σvσiwhere σv2 is the variance of v(t) and σi2 is the variance of i(t).

Xiao and Mansfeld [19] introduced the concept of spectral noise impedance, originally in terms of the Fourier transforms of v(t) and i(t). Bertocci et al. [2] define it in terms of the power spectral densities (PSDs):Rsn(f)=Sv(f)Si(f)where Sv(f) and Si(f) are respectively the PSDs of v(t) and i(t).

Fig. 2 shows the equivalent circuit model of the noise resistance measurement, which is similar to the model used by Bertocci et al. [2]. In Fig. 2, i(t) and v(t) are respectively the ECN and EPN measurements, v1(t) and v2(t) are the EPN sources and Z1(f) and Z2(f) are the respective electrochemical impedances of each electrode about v(t). (That is, Z1(f) and Z2(f) are the frequency dependent gradients of the potential/current curves associated with each electrode at the mixed potential of the average value of v(t). These gradients may or may not be equal to the gradients about each individual electrode’s free corrosion potential, depending on the degree of polarization and non-linearity of the electrodes.) The solution resistance is taken to be incorporated into Z1(f) and Z2(f).

Using the equivalent circuit model, the work of Bertocci et al. [2] and Bautista and Huet [20] provides analysis of how Rn and Rsn(f) are related to the impedance and source EPN of each electrode. The theory shows the spectral noise impedance to be given byRsn2(f)=|Z2(f)|2Sv1(f)+|Z1(f)|2Sv2(f)Sv1(f)+Sv2(f)where Sv1(f) and Sv2(f) are the PSDs of v1(t) and v2(t) respectively.

When the two electrodes have identical impedances of Z(f)=Z1(f)=Z2(f), the spectral noise impedance becomesRsn(f)=|Z(f)|Eqs. , show that the spectral noise impedance can be used for impedance estimation, but typically only if the electrode pair has identical impedances.

In order to ensure identical impedances, the impedance of each electrode can be directly measured using non-EN techniques such as AC polarization. However, this negates the need for a spectral noise impedance measurement as the electrodes’ impedances already will be known. Also, polarization techniques involve the application of external signals to the electrodes, which may be undesirable and they require the use of a potentiostat and other relatively expensive hardware. In this work, the correlation between the measured EPN and ECN (v(t) and i(t)) is proposed as a means for detecting electrode pairs with dissimilar impedances and EPN characteristics. This allows the symmetry of the electrode pair to be assessed entirely from the EN data. No additional measurements are required.

For this work, an electrode pair is considered symmetrical if they possess equal impedances and the EPN originating from each of the electrodes are statistically equal, i.e. if Z1(f)=Z2(f) and Sv1(f)=Sv2(f) then the electrodes are symmetrical.

Section 2 derives the coefficient of correlation and coherence function as a function of the equivalent circuit parameters (Sv1(f), Sv2(f), Z1(f) and Z2(f)) and discusses how they can be used to detect asymmetry. A graphical representation is also discussed. 3 Experimental procedure, 4 Experimental results describe the experimental procedure and the results obtained to support the theory. The cross correlation between an observed EPN/ECN measurement is compared with the cross correlation as predicted by the theory using data obtained by independent measurements (linear polarization (LP) and EPN measurements on each electrode separately).

Section snippets

Potential/current correlation

The coefficient of correlation between v(t) and i(t) obtained from an EPN/ECN measurement is defined asrvi=E[v(t)i(t)]−E[v(t)]E[i(t)]σvσiwhere ‘E’ denotes statistical expectation, and σv2 and σi2 are the variances of v(t) and i(t) respectively. For stationary v(t) and i(t), the coherence function is defined asPvi(f)=|Svi(f)|Sv(f)Si(f)where Sv(f) and Si(f) are the PSDs of v(t) and i(t) respectively. Svi(f) is the cross spectral density of v(t) and i(t), defined as the Fourier transform of the

Experimental procedure

A set of experimental data has been collected to test the relationship suggested by Eq. (16). A system with nominally symmetric electrodes has been obtained by placing an electrode pair of equal surface area in solution together. Asymmetric systems have been obtained in two ways: (i) by use of an electrode pair of differing exposed surface area; and (ii) by placement of electrodes with equal exposed surface in separate solution of differing concentration with a salt bridge to provide

Experimental results

Table 1 summarises the results of the LP and EN measurements. The signal variances listed under the EPN column are normalized such that σv12+σv22=1. The rvi under the EPN/ECN column were computed over a bandwidth of [0.02,0.2] Hz for experiments A1–A3, and over [0.1,1] Hz for B1 and B2.

Table 2 lists the observed corrosion potentials of each electrode individually, and for when the two electrodes are coupled. The table shows that, in all cases, the two electrodes were never observed to have free

Conclusions

The cross correlation between the potential and current EN has been proposed as a means of assessing the symmetry of an electrode pair. It has been shown that when the EN originating from each electrode is statistically independent, non-zero correlation indicates an asymmetric electrode pair and that symmetric electrode pairs yield zero correlation. Consequently the potential/current correlation provides a necessary but not sufficient test for symmetric electrodes. Good agreement between theory

References (22)

  • J.F. Chen et al.

    Corros. Sci.

    (1995)
  • F. Mansfeld

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1990)
  • C.C. Lee et al.

    Corros. Sci.

    (1998)
  • F. Mansfeld et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1998)
  • F. Mansfeld et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1998)
  • Y.J. Tan et al.

    Corros. Sci.

    (1996)
  • F. Mansfeld et al.

    Corros. Sci.

    (2001)
  • D.A. Eden, K. Hladky, D.G. John, J.L. Dawson, in: Proceedings of Corrosion 86, Paper 274, NACE, Houston, TX,...
  • U. Bertocci et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (1997)
  • Y.J. Yan

    J. Corros. Sci. Eng.

    (1999)
  • D.A. Eden, A.N. Rothwell, in: Proceedings of Corrosion 92, Paper 292, NACE, Houston, TX,...
  • Cited by (15)

    • A critical review of electrochemical noise measurement as a tool for evaluation of organic coatings

      2016, Progress in Organic Coatings
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is therefore essential to understand the effect of electrodes asymmetry on ENM when utilized for measuring Rn (and Rsn) of an organically coated metal. The importance of electrode symmetry when measuring electrochemical noise on bare metal has been shown elsewhere [116]. Use of a noisy reference electrode was systematically investigated and compared to a standard noiseless RE set-up in a three or four electrode configurations by Bertocci et al. [117–120].

    • Measuring electrochemical noise of a single working electrode for assessing corrosion resistance of polymer coated metals

      2014, Progress in Organic Coatings
      Citation Excerpt :

      It should be noted that the electrical noise current also indicates the limitation of instrument in measuring electrochemical noise of the extremely low currents. Use of asymmetric electrodes for measuring electrochemical noise of uncoated metal has been extensively discussed by Cottis [29], Lowe et al. [30] and Bertocci et al. [31]. It was shown that in an asymmetric couple with different resistances, the electrode with higher resistance controls the current flowing through the ZRA thus dominating the current noise signal.

    • An alternative to the use of a zero resistance ammeter for electrochemical noise measurement: Theoretical analysis, experimental validation and evaluation of electrode asymmetry

      2013, Corrosion Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The validity of the estimation of the noise resistance, however, relies on two a priori assumptions, namely (i) that nominally identical electrodes have identical impedances [29,36,37] and (ii) that the noise produced by the external circuit used to measure the current is significantly less than the noise generated by the corroding electrodes [38,39]. To some extent, the first assumption can be verified by considering various statistical parameters related to the potential or current noise such as average values, skewness, and correlation coefficient [40,41]. The previous parameters might provide an indication of the symmetry between the two electrodes, but their physical meaning is not straightforward and a unique criterion to evaluate the reliability of the estimation of the noise resistance by evaluating the asymmetry related parameter remains the subject of debate.

    • The assessment of a smart anticorrosive coating by the electrochemical noise technique

      2013, Progress in Organic Coatings
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, the noise resistance was compared with the apparent polarization resistance, measured without IR compensation (Fig. 9). As a general rule it may be said that the noise resistance varied jointly with the apparent polarization resistance when two identical electrodes where employed and the electrochemical reaction is under activation control [57–59]. However, several researchers believed that the similarity between Rn and Rp did not hold for every system [60,61].

    • The anticorrosive performance of zinc-free non-toxic pigment for paints

      2011, Materials Chemistry and Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Table 3 The noise resistance, Fig. 7, was too low and could not be compared with the polarization resistance because the corrosion process is under ohmic control due to the high ionic resistance of the coating [19–21]. In this particular case, the similarity between Rn and the polarization resistance did not hold any longer, as it was stated by several researchers [22,23].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text