Short communicationAnalysis of the positions of substitution of acetate and propionate groups in cellulose acetate–propionate by the reductive-cleavage method
Introduction
Cellulose acetate–propionate (CAP) has been produced commercially for a wide variety of applications, such as printing inks, hot-melt dip coatings, lacquer coatings, and desalination membranes[1]. The functional properties of these products depend upon their degree of substitution (ds) as well as the distribution pattern of the two ester substituent groups on the (4)-β-d-glucopyranosyl residues of the polysaccharide. The structural characterization of cellulose acetate–propionate samples is therefore of significant importance, both for elucidating structure–property relationships and for achieving quality control in production processes. The distribution patterns of acetyl and propionyl groups in CAP samples have not previously been established. In related work, however, the positions of substitution of O-acetyl and O-butyryl groups in cellulose acetate–butyrates were established by sequential methylation under neutral conditions and direct reductive cleavage under conditions that reduced the O-acetyl and O-butyryl groups to O-ethyl and O-butyl groups, respectively, concurrent with reductive cleavage of glycosidic linkages[2]. From these results it was obvious that it should be possible to establish the distribution pattern of O-acetyl and O-propionyl groups in CAP samples using the same procedure. The 27 possible products so obtained (Table 1), which contain a single O-acetyl group (at the 4-position) and varying numbers of O-methyl, O-ethyl, and O-propyl groups, were separated and characterized, revealing the fractional degree of substitution of each ester group at each position of the 4-linked d-glucopyranosyl residues of the polysaccharide. The same CAP samples were subjected to sequential neutral methylation, acyl–ethyl exchange, and reductive cleavage, and the eight products so obtained were separated by GLC and identified as previously described[3]. The latter experiment was not capable of establishing the fractional degree of substitution of each ester at each position but could, for purposes of comparison, establish the combined fractional degrees of substitution of both esters at each position as well as the overall ds.
Section snippets
Analysis of cellulose acetate–propionate by methylation and direct reductive cleavage
Three different samples of cellulose acetate–propionate having similar ds values were chosen for analysis, one (sample A: Eastman CAP 141-20) having a high acetate:propionate ratio (1.96: 0.69) and the other two (sample B: Eastman CAP 482-20 and sample C: Eastman CAP 504-02) having very low acetate:propionate ratios (0.01: 2.71 and 0.06: 2.16, respectively). The samples were methylated by the method of Prehm[4], as described by Mischnick[5], and a portion of each was subjected to reductive
Discussion
Using the mole% of products derived by reductive cleavage of O-acetyl-O-propionyl-O-methylcellulose (Table 2), the fractional degrees of substitution of each ester at each position of the anhydroglucose unit in the three CAP samples were calculated (Table 5, method 2). From these values the fractional degree of substitution of both esters at each position (x2E+x2P, x3E+x3P and x6E+x6P, where E and P represent ethyl and propyl groups derived by reduction of acetyl and propionyl groups,
Materials
Cellulose acetate–propionate samples were provided by Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN, USA. All reagents were obtained and purified as previously described[2].
Instrumentation
Analytical GLC was performed on a Hewlett–Packard model 5890A gas–liquid chromatograph using the same columns and conditions as previously described[2]. GLC–MS analyses were performed using a Finnegan MAT 95 high resolution double-focusing, reverse-geometry mass spectrometer equipped with a Hewlett–Packard 5890A Series II
References (9)
- S. Gedon and R. Fengl, in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 1993, pp...
- N. Yu and G.R. Gray, Carbohydr. Res., 312 (1998)...
- C.K. Lee and G.R. Gray, Carbohydr. Res., 269 (1995)...
- P. Prehm, Carbohydr. Res., 78 (1980)...
Cited by (8)
Chemical Structure Analysis of Starch and Cellulose Derivatives
2010, Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :Therefore, such derivatives are methanolyzed, and then hydrogenated (→O-propyl), hydrolyzed, and reduced to glucitols, which finally are propanoated (Fig. 20) The details for certain derivatives can be found in the references cited and have also been comprehensively reviewed,39,238 but some general requirements and critical points should be addressed here. Each step of sample preparation comprises a potential bias of the analyte mixture.
Synthesis of cellulose acetate propionate with controllable contents and distributions of acetyl and propionyl in the C2, C3 and C6 positions
2017, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and CatalysisChemical characterization of polysaccharides
2013, The European Polysaccharide Network of Excellence (EPNOE): Research Initiatives and Results