Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 81, Issues 1–2, July–August 1997, Pages 145-152
Biological Conservation

Relationship between numbers of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera : Silphidae) and available food resources

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00158-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Oliver (Coleoptera : Silphidae), designated in the United States as an endangered species, requires vertebrate carcasses for feeding, breeding and rearing young (optimally 80–200 g for breeding, but beetles readily feed on smaller carcasses). Previous studies at the 29 000 ha Fort Chaffee Military Reservation, Arkansas and the 20 000 ha Camp Gruber Training Site, Oklahoma have shown that with habitat defined based on vegetation, the species is a habitat generalist when feeding. Given that the species was not selective relative to habitat type at Fort Chaffee, we investigated whether there was a relationship between numbers of beetles and measures of vertebrate abundance. For beetles, eight baited pitfall traps were set for three nights in 1992 and 1993 along each of the 52 transects where, in previous years, birds and mammals had been censused. Birds were counted using a modified point-count technique (five counts during May–June 1989–1991), and mammals were sampled with ‘museum special’ snap traps and rat traps (three two-day traping periods during May–June 1989–1991). In analyzing 0–200 g mammals trapped and birds counted on the transects, significant correlations were found of the number of American burying beetles caught with biomass of mammals; biomass of mammals plus birds; numbers of species of mammals; and numbers of individual mammals. American burying beetles frequented sites where small vertebrates (particularly mammals) were relatively abundant, irrespective of the predominant habitat at that site.

References (27)

  • American Ornithologists' Union

    Check-list of North American Birds

    (1983)
  • R.S. Anderson

    On the decreasing abundance of Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera : Silphidae) in eastern North America

    Coleopterist's Bull.

    (1982)
  • J. Blondel et al.

    Point counts with unlimited distance

    Stud. Avian Biol.

    (1981)
  • J.B. Cox et al.

    Soil Survey of Sebastian County, Arkansas

    (1975)
  • J.C. Creighton et al.

    Survey methods for the American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma and Arkansas

    (1993)
  • J.C. Creighton et al.

    Habitat preference of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma

    Southwest. Nat.

    (1993)
  • N. Cressie

    Statistics for Spatial Data

    (1991)
  • J.B. Dunning

    CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses

    (1993)
  • Great Plains Flora Association

    Flora of the Great Plains

    (1986)
  • F.L. Johnson et al.

    Floral Inventory of Fort Chaffee, Arkansas

    (1990)
  • D. Keckler

    Surfer for Windows

    (1994)
  • B.C. Klein

    Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in central Amazonia

    Ecology

    (1989)
  • A.J. Kozol et al.

    The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus: studies on the natural history of a declining species

    Psyche

    (1988)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Molecular phylogeny of the burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorinae)

      2013, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      The classic work on the biology of Nicrophorus by Pukowski (1933) remains valuable today. Extensive use of burying beetles as research models and the intensive study of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, 1790) have produced a wealth of information on Nicrophorus distribution, habitat preferences, phenology, diel periodicity, physiology, behavior, and their phoretic mites, especially for a subset of the more common North American, European and Japanese species (e.g. Anderson, 1982; Anduaga, 2009; Arce et al., 2012; Bedick et al., 1999; Boncoraglio and Kilner, 2012; Heinrich, 2012; Hocking et al., 2007; Holloway and Schnell, 1997; Hwang and Shiao, 2011; Ikeda at al., 2006; Kishida and Suzuki, 2010; Knee et al., 2012; Leasure et al., 2012; Lomolino et al., 1995; Nisimura et al., 2005; Sikes and Raithel, 2002; Smith et al., 2007; Trumbo and Robinson, 2008). This availability of data on behavior and ecology, albeit for a relatively small subset of the world’s species, makes Nicrophorus a compelling group to analyze life history and ecological traits from a phylogenetic perspective.

    • Differential responses of scavenging arthropods and vertebrates to forest loss maintain ecosystem function in a heterogeneous landscape

      2013, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, soil temperature, which can increase due to forest fragmentation (Chen et al., 1999), is important for Nicrophorus reproduction because egg mortality of N. quadripunctatus is known to increase with temperature (from 20 °C to 25 °C; Nishimura et al., 2002). The abundance of vertebrates is considered to be an important factor determining Nicrophorus populations (e.g. Holloway and Schnell, 1997). However, the effects of vertebrate abundance on Nicrophorus populations are unclear because we did not accurately estimate vertebrate abundance in this study.

    • Nature underfoot: Living with beetles, crabgrass, fruit flies, and other tiny life around us

      2020, Nature Underfoot: Living with Beetles, Crabgrass, Fruit Flies, and Other Tiny Life Around Us
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

    View full text