Cancers of the breast and female genital system: Search for recessive genetic factors through analysis of human isolate

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33302-0Get rights and content

Abstract

To investigate the importance of recessive genes in female breast and genital cancers, we have conducted investigations in the Hutterites, a highly inbred genetic isolate in North America. The homogeneous life style of this group, which lives on communal farms, also facilities distinction between shared environmental and genetic factors. We ascertained 177 cases of cancer (all organ systems) through Canadian and United States cancer registries, field trips, and searches of death certificates. Breast cancer and endometrial cancer mortalities were those expected for 1970 United States whites, but no deaths due to squamous cervical carcinoma were ascertained in this monogamous population. Inbreeding coefficients (F) for cases were higher than means for matched controls for each of the four cases of breast cancers that occured in yougner women (less than 45 years of age), for four of five cases of endometrial cancer, and for the single cases of uterine leimyosarcoma, dysgerminoma, and ovarian adenocarcinoma. By contrast, in cases of breast cancer that occurred in women 45 years of age or older, only four of 15 F’s were above those for controls. There is a significant difference between the two breast cancer age groups with respect to the likelihood that the F of cases was higher than the F of controls (x2=6.99, p <0.01). However, grouping cases by type, none of the F distributions were significantly different from those of their matched controls. These preliminary genetic investigations thus confirm certain concepts concerning breast and female genital cancer but also suggest the desirability of further studies to elucidate the role of genetic factors in premenopausal breast cancer. (Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 141:629, 1981.)

References (16)

  • A.O. Martin

    The founder effect in a human isolate: Evolutionary implications

    Am. J. Phys. Anthropol

    (1970)
  • A.G. Steinberg et al.

    Genetic studies on an inbred human isolate

  • A.P.L. Mange

    Growth and inbreeding of a human isolate, Hum

    Biol

    (1967)
  • C.L. Olsen

    The demography of new colony formation in a human isolate: Analysis and history, Ph.D. thesis

    (1976)
  • A.O. Martin et al.

    Cancer mortality in a human isolate

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst

    (1980)
  • Martin, A.O., Dunn J.K., and Smalley, B.: Use of genealogically linked data base in the analysis of cancer in a human...
  • Siegel, S.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York, 1956, McGraw-Hill, p....
  • Simpson, J.L.: Genetics of pelvic cancer, in Sciarra, J.J., editor: Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 4, Hagerstown....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (25)

  • Ancestry-Dependent Enrichment of Deleterious Homozygotes in Runs of Homozygosity

    2019, American Journal of Human Genetics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The distribution of runs of homozygosity in individual genomes has provided insights into evolutionary, population, and medical genetics.1 By examining their genomic location and prevalence in a population, we can learn about the history and adaptation of natural populations,2–30,96,97 and we can make discoveries about the genetic basis of complex phenotypes.32–48 Given the importance of demographic history and socio-cultural practices in the generation of ROH in individual genomes, and their relationship to complex phenotypes including many genetic diseases, it naturally follows to study the distribution of deleterious alleles and their relationship to ROH.

  • Genome-wide homozygosity signatures and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk

    2010, Blood
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although this may be reflective of the biology, it may also be a consequence of GWA studies having suboptimal ability to detect recessively acting disease alleles. Clues that tumor susceptibility may have a recessive basis come from reports of an increased incidence associated with consanguinity and in populations characterized by a high degree of inbreeding.4-9 Further evidence for the role of homozygosity in cancer predisposition is provided by experimental animal inbreeding (eg, backcrossing mice) increasing tumor incidence.10

  • Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity: A novel chromosomal lesion in myeloid malignancies

    2010, Blood
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the cause of larger regions of CN-LOH seen in significant proportions of healthy unrelated controls studied in various projects has not been precisely identified, and the size of regions of CN-LOH is expected to get smaller with the increasingly outbred nature of urban human populations.20 Of great interest, forms of constitutional LOH have been implicated in predisposition to malignancies, a fact best illustrated in inbred ethnic populations.21-24 Comparisons of germline SNP-A data of 74 colorectal cancer patients identified that the percentage of those with autozygous segments of 4 Mb or more is at least twice as high as in control groups.25

  • Runs of Homozygosity in European Populations

    2008, American Journal of Human Genetics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Quantification of individual autozygosity is also of interest to those investigating recessive effects in complex-disease genetics. Several studies in consanguineous or small, isolated populations with above average levels of parental relatedness have found evidence for a genome-wide effect of homozygosity on coronary heart disease,29–31 cancer,29,32–34 blood pressure,10–17 and LDL cholesterol.15 These findings are consistent with studies suggesting that the variants associated with increased risk of common complex disease are more likely to be rare than to be common in the population;35,36 are more likely to be distributed abundantly rather than sparsely across the genome,37 and are more likely to be recessive than to be dominant.38

  • Leiomyosarcomas: Clinical presentation

    1993, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by Grant No. 19822 from the National Cancer Institute.

Sponsored by the Society for Gynecologic Investigation.

View full text