Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 13, Issue 2, August 2008, Pages 350-356
Epilepsy & Behavior

Functional MRI and Wada studies in patients with interhemispheric dissociation of language functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.04.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Rare patients with chronic epilepsy show interhemispheric dissociation of language functions on intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) testing. We encountered four patients with interhemispheric dissociation in 490 consecutive Wada language tests. In all cases, performance on overt speech production tasks was supported by the hemisphere contralateral to the seizure focus, whereas performance on comprehension tasks was served by the hemisphere with the seizure focus. These data suggest that speech production capacity is more likely to shift hemispheres than is language comprehension. Wada and fMRI language lateralization scores were discordant in three of the four patients. However, the two methods aligned more closely when Wada measures loading on comprehension were used to calculate lateralization scores. Thus, interhemispheric dissociation of language functions could explain some cases of discordance on Wada/fMRI language comparisons, particularly when the fMRI measure used is not sensitive to speech production processes.

Introduction

Measurement of language lateralization, using either the intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), is a routine part of the presurgical evaluation of patients with intractable epilepsy. Knowledge about language dominance can be useful for predicting cognitive morbidity from surgery. Patients with epilepsy have a higher incidence of atypical language representation than the healthy population [1], [2], [3]. Many factors are known to influence language lateralization. The role of early brain injury in language reorganization is well documented [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Location of the seizure focus, seizure frequency, size of brain lesion, and handedness also influence language reorganization and shifting of language abilities [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Although atypical language representation is not uncommon among patients with chronic epilepsy, a strong difference in lateralization between different language skills is rare. Kurthen at al. [12] reported four cases of dissociation of language functions during Wada testing among 144 patients. These authors considered counting backward; speech production on tasks of naming, repetition, and reading; and dysphasic errors (paraphasias and perseveration) to reflect “expressive” linguistic capacities, whereas comprehension of spoken commands and questions was used to assess “receptive” language functions. Their findings demonstrated that in rare cases, the expressive language system can be located in one hemisphere and receptive language ability in the other. In a study examining bilateral language representation among patients with epilepsy, Risse and co-authors [2] mentioned that they found only two patients among more than 500 Wada studies whose results suggested interhemispheric dissociation of language skills. The Wada test used by these authors assessed automatic speech, naming, reading, and auditory comprehension. Dissociations in their two patients reportedly reflected differential lateralization on comprehension and overt speech production tasks. No further information is available about these patients because neither met criteria for inclusion in the study.

Although the Wada test has been the gold standard for many years for assessing language dominance, fMRI has recently emerged as a viable noninvasive alternative to the Wada. Many studies have examined the degree of concordance between these methods. Although several initial studies with small patient samples reported 100% concordance [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], more recent, larger series show discordance rates in the range of 5–25% [21], [22], [23], [24]. The degree of discordance varies depending on region of interest (e.g., frontal vs temporal) over which the lateralization measure is computed, methods used to determine laterality (e.g., placement of cutoff scores), seizure location (e.g., temporal vs extratemporal), language (e.g., semantic judgment vs fluency), and control/contrast tasks (perceptual controls vs rest) employed during fMRI, and the Wada language tasks used.

Discrepancies between Wada and fMRI could arise from several factors, as each test has potential methodological limitations. The validity of the Wada test can be compromised by obtundation, insufficient anesthetization, interhemispheric arterial crossflow, and the relatively brief period available for testing. Functional MRI results can be affected by head motion, insufficient statistical power due to inadequate number of trials or image volumes [25], and poor task compliance. Functional MRI procedures also must be carefully designed to activate a wide range of language processes yet avoid activation of nonlanguage systems (e.g., attention, low-level audition, or vision) engaged by the language task(s). Functional MRI and Wada are fundamentally different in that one is an activation method and the other is a transient “lesion” paradigm. Discrepancies could thus arise when the fMRI lateralization score reflects activation that is not essential for performance.

Discordance might also arise when the fMRI protocol does not examine the same set of language processes assessed during Wada testing. During the Wada procedure, each hemisphere is tested on multiple language tasks (i.e., comprehension, naming, repetition, and reading), whereas fMRI protocols often use a single task or task contrast. Functional MRI protocols may thus be more sensitive to some language processes than others. Given this difference between the two techniques, discordance could arise in some cases as a result of differential lateralization of certain language capacities (e.g., speech production) relative to others (e.g., language comprehension). In such cases, the Wada lateralization score would be more likely to show bilateral language representation, whereas fMRI might suggest a more lateralized language system because of inability to detect particular language components.

We describe four patients who showed clear interhemispheric dissociation of language functions on Wada testing. For these patients, one type of language task (either production or comprehension) was supported exclusively by one hemisphere, whereas the other type was supported by the opposite hemisphere. All four patients underwent fMRI language mapping to determine if patients with this pattern of bilateral language would show discordance between Wada and fMRI and to examine several hypotheses about the underlying reason for this discordance. This study provides the first fMRI data on patients with clear signs of interhemispheric dissociations in language functions.

Section snippets

Patient selection and Wada testing

The patients were selected from 490 consecutive adults who underwent comprehensive evaluation for surgical treatment of medically intractable epilepsy. Of this sample, 269 patients underwent both Wada and fMRI tests, including all 4 of the patients described in this article. In addition to fMRI, the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy included long-term video/EEG monitoring, neuropsychological testing, structural brain MRI, and a standardized Wada test. The Wada procedure was similar to that

Results

Demographic and relevant epilepsy-related information for the four patients is summarized in Table 1. The differences between Wada LIs and fMRI LIs (absolute values) were relatively large for three patients (discordant cases: S1 = 93, S2 = 43, and S3 = 113), whereas the difference for the remaining patient was relatively small (concordant case: S4 = 14). Both S1 and S2 had Wada LIs showing relatively symmetric language representation (S1: −16, S2: +10) and had fMRI LIs showing clear left dominance (S1:

Discussion

Epilepsy surgery candidates provide a unique opportunity to examine the effects of a chronic focal abnormality on the cerebral organization of language. It is well documented that patients with early left hemisphere lesions, particularly non-right-handed patients, have a higher incidence of atypical (right or bilateral) representation of language functions. Atypical language representation is estimated to occur in 5 to 53% of right-handed epilepsy patients [1], [2], [3], [7], [33], whereas the

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Linda Allen, George Morris, Romila Mushtaq, Conrad Nievera, and Manoj Raghavan for assistance with patient recruitment. This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke Grant R01 NS35929, National Institutes of Health General Clinical Research Center Grant M01 RR00058, and the Charles A. Dana Foundation.

References (59)

  • R.W. Cox

    AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages

    Comput Biomed Res

    (1996)
  • T.M. Loucks et al.

    Human brain activation during phonation and exhalation: common volitional control for two upper airway functions

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • V. Troiani et al.

    Narrative speech production: an fMRI study using continuous arterial spin labeling

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • M. Staudt et al.

    Right-hemispheric organization of language following early left-sided brain lesions: functional MRI topography

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • V.L. Gracco et al.

    Imaging speech production using fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • S.R. Benbadis et al.

    Is speech arrest during Wada testing a valid method for determining hemispheric representation of language?

    Brain Lang

    (1998)
  • R.A. Poldrack et al.

    Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex

    NeuroImage

    (1999)
  • R.C. Oldfield

    The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • T. Rasmussen et al.

    The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions

    Ann NY Acad Sci

    (1977)
  • J.A. Springer et al.

    Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study

    Brain

    (1999)
  • R.P. Woods et al.

    Brain injury, handedness, and speech lateralization in a series of amobarbital studies

    Ann Neurol

    (1988)
  • R. Rausch et al.

    Right-hemisphere language dominance in right-handed epileptic patients

    Arch Neurol

    (1984)
  • R. Rausch et al.

    Right-hemisphere language dominance in temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical and neuropsychological correlates

    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

    (1991)
  • J.E. Desmond et al.

    Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients

    Brain

    (1995)
  • J.R. Binder et al.

    Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test

    Neurology

    (1996)
  • L. Hertz-Pannier et al.

    Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: a preliminary study [see comment]

    Neurology

    (1997)
  • F.Z. Yetkin et al.

    Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1998)
  • R.R. Benson et al.

    Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions

    Neurology

    (1999)
  • S. Lehericy et al.

    Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (48)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text