Elsevier

Thrombosis Research

Volume 128, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages e9-e13
Thrombosis Research

Regular Article
Engineered virus-like nanoparticles reverse heparin anticoagulation more consistently than protamine in plasma from heparin-treated patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2011.03.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Heparin is widely used for anticoagulation, often requiring the subsequent administration of a reversal agent. The only approved reversal agent for heparin is protamine sulfate, which induces well described adverse reactions in patients. Previously we reported a novel class of heparin antagonists based on the bacteriophage Qβ platform, displaying polyvalent cationic motifs which bind with high affinity to heparin. Here we report heparin reversal by the most effective of these virus-like particles (VLP) in samples from patients who were administered heparin during cardiac procedures or therapeutically for treatment of various thrombotic conditions. The VLP consistently reversed heparin in these samples, including those from patients that received high doses of heparin, with greater efficiency than a negative control VLP and with significantly less variability than protamine sulfate. These results provide the first step towards validation of heparin antagonist VLPs as viable alternatives to protamine.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Virus-like particles (VLPs) derived from bacteriophage Qβ coat protein containing mutations of Thr18 to Arg (T18R) and of Lys16 to Met (K16M) were produced and isolated as previously described [15], [16]. Purified particles were stored in 0.1 M HEPES, pH 7.4.

Citrated plasma samples were collected from patients treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) at Scripps Green Hospital after informed consent was obtained. Patients were identified and screened through the cardiac

Results

All of the therapeutic UFH samples were assayed for heparin reversal by the two VLPs using an aPTT assay. This assay was adapted for addition of VLP to the plasma samples, producing a reference clot time for pooled normal plasma of 46 seconds. Fig. 1A and B show heparin reversal by T18R and K16M respectively for one plasma sample from each patient as a representative subset of all the data collected. T18R significantly reduced the clotting time in the aPTT assay, indicating that it was

Discussion

The T18R VLP was found to reverse heparin anticoagulation at therapeutic levels significantly better than the negative control VLP, K16M (Fig. 1). Reversal was 69 ± 10% with a slight increase in reversal as UFH concentration increased. The 10% variability observed was remarkably low considering the expected differences in plasma from different patients. In a comparison of T18R to protamine sulfate with samples from patients treated with high doses of UFH during cardiac catheterization procedures,

Conflict of interest statement

We report no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was supported by NIH/NCRR UL1 RR025774 (Pilot-Gale), The Stein Endowment Fund (Gale) and by NIH R01 CA112075 (Finn).

References (33)

  • C. Peterson et al.

    Improving heparin safety: A multidisciplinary invited conference

    Hosp Pharm

    (2008)
  • D.C. Classen et al.

    Adverse drug events among hospitalized Medicare patients: epidemiology and national estimates from a new approach to surveillance

    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf

    (2010)
  • M.A. Crowther et al.

    Heparin

  • R.N. Pike et al.

    Control of the coagulation system by serpins. Getting by with a little help from glycosaminoglycans

    FEBS J

    (2005)
  • J.C. Horrow

    Protamine: a review of its toxicity

    Anesth Analg

    (1985)
  • I.J. Welsby et al.

    Hemodynamic changes after protamine administration: association with mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery

    Anesthesiology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (18)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text