Elsevier

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volume 114, Issue 8, 16 August 2010, Pages 1733-1746
Remote Sensing of Environment

Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: New methods and datasets based on ‘urban ecoregions’

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Although cities, towns and settlements cover only a tiny fraction (< 1%) of the world's surface, urban areas are the nexus of human activity with more than 50% of the population and 70–90% of economic activity. As such, material and energy consumption, air pollution, and expanding impervious surface are all concentrated in urban areas, with important environmental implications at local, regional and potentially global scales. New ways to measure and monitor the built environment over large areas are thus critical to answering a wide range of environmental research questions related to the role of urbanization in climate, biogeochemistry and hydrological cycles. This paper presents a new dataset depicting global urban land at 500-m spatial resolution based on MODIS data (available at http://sage.wisc.edu/urbanenvironment.html). The methodological approach exploits temporal and spectral information in one year of MODIS observations, classified using a global training database and an ensemble decision-tree classification algorithm. To overcome confusion between urban and built-up lands and other land cover types, a stratification based on climate, vegetation, and urban topology was developed that allowed region-specific processing. Using reference data from a sample of 140 cities stratified by region, population size, and level of economic development, results show a mean overall accuracy of 93% (k = 0.65) at the pixel level and a high level of agreement at the city scale (R2 = 0.90).

Introduction

In a relatively short period of time, urbanization has emerged as a top environmental issue facing many parts of the Earth (Montgomery, 2008). Urban areas have profound environmental impacts that extend beyond city boundaries, including urban heat island effects, impervious surfaces that alter sensible and latent heat fluxes, conversion and fragmentation of natural ecosystems, loss of agricultural land, contamination of air, soil and water, increased water use and runoff, and reduced biodiversity (Pickett et al., 1997, El Araby, 2002, Alberti, 2005, Shepherd, 2005). New estimates that half of the global population now lives in urban areas means that the importance and impact of cities is greater than ever before (UN, 2008). An additional two billion people are expected to arrive in cities by 2050, with nearly 90% of this growth expected in developing countries. Clearly, the impact of urban areas on the human population and the global environment is significant, and will become even more pronounced in the future (Mills, 2007).

While we are beginning to comprehend the local environmental impacts of urbanization, there is a new interest across several disciplines to understand how urbanization — regionally or cumulatively — contributes to global environmental change (Grimmond, 2008, Mills, 2007). Urban areas are the primary source regions of anthropogenic carbon emissions (Svirejeva-Hopkins et al., 2004), yet global models of climate and biogeochemistry include only relatively crude representations of urban areas (Pataki et al., 2006). Recent studies have demonstrated that accurate representation of urban land use is both important and poorly captured in current models (Oleson et al., 2008, Peters-Lidard et al., 2004). Accurate and timely information on the distribution and characteristics of urban areas are therefore essential for a wide array of geophysical research questions related to the impact of humans on the environment (Kaye et al., 2006). The datasets that have emerged during the last decade show considerable disagreement on the location and extent of urban areas (Potere and Schneider, 2007, Potere et al., 2009). Moreover, most environmental modeling efforts require additional information that is not available at regional to global scales, including urban vegetation types, presence of irrigation, building heights and materials, and urban surface radiative and thermodynamic properties (Oleson et al., 2008).

In this paper we present results from a new effort to create a global map of urban, built-up and settled areas, which serves as the first stage in our development of a comprehensive database of urban land surface characteristics for 2001–2010. This work builds on previous mapping efforts using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data at 1-km spatial resolution (Schneider et al., 2003, Schneider et al., 2005), which is included as part of the MODIS Collection 4 (C4) Global Land Cover Product (Friedl et al., 2002). Here we address weaknesses in the first map as well as several limitations of contemporary global urban maps by developing a methodology that relies solely on newly released Collection 5 (C5) MODIS 500-m resolution data. Specifically, a supervised decision-tree classification algorithm is used to map urban areas using region-specific parameters. At the heart of our approach is a new, global stratification of “urban ecoregions” that facilitates study and mapping of cities and towns at regional to global scales. After describing our methods, we expand on work presented in Schneider et al. (2009) by presenting our results, a validation of the new map using a global, stratified random sample of 140 case study cities, and assessment of urban land densities captured by the new global urban map.

Section snippets

Background: strengths and weaknesses of global urban mapping efforts

During the last two decades, eight different teams have developed global maps that offer circa-2000 portraits of urban areas (see Gamba and Herold, 2009). Table 1 summarizes the data, methods, and urban definitions used for each map, as well as the estimates of global urban area derived from each. Substantial progress has been made since the first maps were released in the early 1990s, yet mapping urban areas at global scale remains a complex challenge. The global area of urban land is small

Defining urban extent

Because of the difficulties associated with defining ‘urban areas’, it is important to provide a clear conceptual framework of the urban environment for regional and global mapping studies. “Urbanized land” is a depiction of land use, and includes commercial, industrial, residential and transportation land use types, because these classes are most functional for urban planners and practitioners. These classes are distinct from land cover, which is defined as the physical attributes,

Overview

In this section, we describe our methodology for deriving urban areas from C5 MODIS data using region-specific processing. We first present a stratification of urban ecoregions that we developed to allow region-specific image processing. We then describe the data inputs and methodology for the classification and post-processing steps. Finally, we describe the validation data and methods used to assess the accuracy of the new global urban map.

Urban ecoregions — a new approach for stratification of global urban systems

To facilitate processing and classification of the

Local and regional views of urban extent

We begin our assessment at the scale of cities and regions. Representative results from the MODIS 500-m map are shown in Fig. 5 for four cities: two are located in more developed countries (Washington D.C., USA; London, U.K.), and two are located in less developed regions (Johannesburg, South Africa; Guangzhou, China). When compared against the Landsat-based reference maps (top row), the MODIS 500-m map (second row) provides a more detailed, articulated representation of built-up areas for each

Discussion and conclusions

This paper describes a new map of circa 2001–2002 global urban extent derived from C5 MODIS 500-m data. Despite limitations related to cloud cover and missing data within urban cores, our methods were successful in depicting cities, towns and settlements of multiple sizes and scales. The improved quality of the C5 MODIS data, combined with the new, region-based mapping approach, translates into several significant improvements in the new map. Chief among these is the increased level of accuracy

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Solly Angel and Dan Civco for generous use of their datasets, Scott Macomber and Damien Sulla-Menashe for technical support, and Mutlu Ozdogan for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This work was supported by NASA grant NNX08AE61A.

References (67)

  • C. Small et al.

    Estimation and vicarious validation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2006)
  • A. Svirejeva-Hopkins et al.

    Urbanised territories as a specific component of the global carbon cycle

    Ecological Modelling

    (2004)
  • M. Alberti

    The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function

    International Regional Science Review

    (2005)
  • O. Allouche et al.

    Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2006)
  • S. Angel et al.

    The dynamics of global urban expansion

    (2005)
  • O. Arino et al.

    GlobCover: ESA service for global land cover from MERIS

  • P. Bairoch

    Cities and economic development: From the dawn of history to the present

  • E. Bartholome et al.

    GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (2005)
  • A.S. Belward et al.

    The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set, DISCover: First results

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (1997)
  • B. Bhaduri et al.

    LandScan: Locating people is what matters

    Geoinfomatics

    (2002)
  • J.C.W. Chan et al.

    Detecting the nature of change in an urban environment: A comparison of machine learning algorithms

    Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

    (2001)
  • Global Rural–Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP), Alpha Version: Urban Extents

  • J. Cohen

    A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1960)
  • M. Collins et al.

    Logistic regression, Adaboost, & Bregman distances

    Machine Learning

    (2002)
  • D.M. Danko

    The digital chart of the world project

    Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

    (1992)
  • R.S. DeFries et al.

    A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing

    Global Change Biology

    (2000)
  • C. Elvidge et al.

    Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces

    Sensors

    (2007)
  • ESA, European Space Agency

    GlobCover products description and validation report

  • U.M. Fayyad et al.

    On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation

    Machine Learning

    (1992)
  • G.M. Foody

    Map comparison in GIS

    Progress in Physical Geography

    (2007)
  • M.A. Friedl et al.

    MODIS Collection 5 Global Land Cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2009)
  • J. Friedman et al.

    Additive logistic regression

    Annals of Statistics

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text