Elsevier

Renewable Energy

Volume 60, December 2013, Pages 127-136
Renewable Energy

Review
Relationships between cellulosic biomass particle size and enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield: Analysis of inconsistent reports in the literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.04.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We summarize reported relationships between biomass particle size and sugar yield.

  • We summarize experimental conditions and results on this topic.

  • We analyze the inconsistent relationships from five perspectives.

  • Several hypotheses are formulated based on what is reviewed.

  • Future research is proposed to test these hypotheses.

Abstract

Cellulosic ethanol made from cellulosic biomass is a promising alternative to petroleum-based transportation fuels. Enzymatic hydrolysis is a crucial step in cellulosic ethanol production. In order to better understand the mechanisms of enzymatic hydrolysis, relationships between cellulosic biomass particle size and enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield have been studied extensively. However, the literature contains inconsistent reports. This paper presents an analysis of the inconsistent reports on the relationships in the literature. It discusses the differences in the reported experiments from five perspectives (biomass category, particle size definition, sugar yield definition, biomass treatment procedure, and particle size level). It also proposes future research activities that can provide further understanding of the relationships.

Introduction

During the last three decades, consumption of petroleum-based liquid transportation fuels (including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuels) in the U.S. has increased by more than 30% [1]. These fuels account for about 70% of total petroleum consumption in the U.S. [1]. In 2010, more than 3 billion liters of petroleum were consumed in the U.S. every day, and over 60% of them were imported [1]. Also, the price of petroleum in the U.S. has almost doubled during the last ten years [1]. In addition, use of petroleum-based fuels contributes to accumulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) in the atmosphere [2]. Therefore, it is critically important to explore alternatives to petroleum-based liquid transportation fuels [3], [4], [5]. One such alternative is cellulosic ethanol.

An essential step in cellulosic ethanol production is enzymatic hydrolysis which converts cellulose into soluble sugars. A high sugar yield in enzymatic hydrolysis is crucial to the cost-effectiveness of cellulosic ethanol production. Several characteristics of cellulosic biomass have been identified as key factors affecting sugar yield in enzymatic hydrolysis, including biomass particle size, degree of polymerization, crystallinity, and accessible surface area [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In order to understand the mechanisms of enzymatic hydrolysis and to increase sugar yield in enzymatic hydrolysis, many studies have been done to investigate the relationships between cellulosic biomass particle size and enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield. However, three different relationships have been reported: negative (smaller particle size produces higher sugar yield), neutral (particle size has no effects on sugar yield), and positive (larger particle size produces higher sugar yield).

This paper, for the first time, presents an analysis of the inconsistent reports on the relationships. It discusses the differences in the reported experiments from five perspectives (biomass category, particle size definition, sugar yield definition, biomass treatment procedure, and particle size level). It also proposes future research activities that can provide further understanding of the relationships.

Section snippets

Two categories of cellulosic biomass

The cellulosic biomass used to investigate relationships between particle size and sugar yield can be classified into two categories: pure cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass. As summarized in Fig. 1 and Table 1,when pure cellulose was used, negative relationships were reported in a majority of the related studies. When lignocellulosic biomass was used, three different relationships were reported by different researchers.

Shewale and Sadana [15] reported a neutral relationship between particle

Two definitions of particle size

Two definitions of particle size (sieve size versus screen size) were used in reported experiments. As summarized in Fig. 4 and Table 2,when sieve size was used, consistent (positive) relationships were reported. When screen size was used, three different relationships were reported.

Fig. 5 illustrates two definitions of particle size used in the literature. For one definition, different sieve sizes were used in milling to control particle size (one sieve size was used for one particle size).

Different definitions of sugar yield

Three different definitions of sugar yield (glucose/pre-hydrolysis cellulose ratio, glucose/pre-hydrolysis biomass ratio, and glucose/pre-pretreatment cellulose ratio) were used in reported studies. Fig. 10 describes the sequence of four processes (size reduction, pelleting, pretreatment, and hydrolysis) in cellulosic ethanol production. The glucose/pre-hydrolysis cellulose ratio represents the ratio (weight/weight) of glucose in post-hydrolysis solution to cellulose in pre-hydrolysis biomass.

Two procedures of treatment

Two procedures of treatment were used in reported studies – one with pretreatment and the other without. As shown in Fig. 12 and Table 6, when pretreatment was not applied, consistent negative relationships were reported. When pretreatment was applied, three different relationships were reported. When biomass was pretreated by ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) [19], hot water [21], sodium carbonate [24], sodium chlorite [22], and steam explosion [18], negative relationships were reported. When

Different levels of particle size

Particle sizes used in most studies can be classified into two levels: micron level (particle sizes were smaller than 1 mm) and millimeter level (particle sizes were larger than 1 mm). As shown in Fig. 13 and Table 7, when micron-level particle sizes were used, negative relationships were reported by most studies. When millimeter-level particle sizes were used, two different relationships were reported.

Concluding remarks

It is of both academic and practical importance to know the relationships between cellulosic biomass particle size and enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield. The literature contains inconsistent reports on this relationship. Some say that smaller particles produce higher sugar yield, some say that larger particles produce higher sugar yield, and some say that particle size does not affect sugar yield.

It is desirable to understand why such inconsistence exists. Looking at relevant publications from

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported financially by NSF award CMMI-0970112.

References (63)

  • W. Kaar et al.

    Using lime pretreatment to facilitate the enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2000)
  • A. Kyriacou et al.

    Effect of physical parameters on the adsorption characteristics of fractionated Trichoderma reesei cellulase components

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (1988)
  • S. Mani et al.

    Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2004)
  • A.T.W.M. Hendriks et al.

    Pretreatment to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass

    Bioresour Technol

    (2009)
  • P. Alvira et al.

    Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review

    Bioresour Technol

    (2010)
  • L. Zhu et al.

    Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility

    Bioresour Technol

    (2008)
  • P. Bansal et al.

    Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates

    Bioresour Technol

    (2010)
  • M.M. Nazhad et al.

    Structural constraints affecting the initial enzymatic hydrolysis of recycled paper

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (1995)
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration

    Short-term energy outlook

    (2011)
  • L.R. Lynd et al.

    The role of biomass in America's energy future: framing the analysis

    Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin

    (2009)
  • U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

    The energy independence and security act of 2007

    (2007)
  • B.C. Vidal et al.

    Influence of feedstock particle size on lignocellulose conversion – a review

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol

    (2011)
  • D.J. Gregg et al.

    Factors affecting cellulose hydrolysis and the potential of enzyme recycle to enhance the efficiency of an integrated wood to ethanol process

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1996)
  • S.D. Mansfield et al.

    Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis

    Biotechnol Progr

    (1999)
  • M. Mandels et al.

    The use of adsorbed cellulase in the continuous conversion of cellulose to glucose

    J. Polym. Sci.

    (1971)
  • A.P. Sinitsyn et al.

    Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol

    (1991)
  • K. Sangseethong et al.

    Rationale for particle size effect on rates of enzymatic saccharification of microcrystalline cellulose

    J Food Biochem

    (1998)
  • J.G. Shewale et al.

    Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials by Sclerotium rolfsii culture filtrate for sugar production

    Can J Microbiol

    (1979)
  • S.P.S. Chundawat et al.

    Effect of particle size based separation of milled corn stover on AFEX pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2007)
  • R.K. Dasari et al.

    The effect of particle size on hydrolysis reaction rates and rheological properties in cellulosic slurries

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • M.J. Zeng et al.

    Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2007)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Elucidating thermochemical pretreatment effectiveness of different particle-size switchgrass for cellulosic ethanol production

      2022, Biomass and Bioenergy
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, previous studies have conveyed substantial inconsistencies in enzymatic digestibility as a function of biomass particle size. For alkaline pretreatment, larger particle size is mostly reported to render higher sugar conversion, while numeral studies indicated that particle size has no significant effect on sugar conversion in acid pretreatment [21]. There are two main methods to calculate sugar conversion: either based on the raw biomass (considering the sugar recovery during pretreatment and conversion efficiency during enzymatic hydrolysis) or the pretreated biomass (only counting conversion efficiency during enzymatic hydrolysis) [22].

    • Solvents and ions for pretreatment in lignocellulosic biorefineries

      2022, Process Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, an effective pretreatment of biomass increases the surface area that is accessible to enzymes in comparison to untreated biomass. Without pretreatment, smaller particles of different types of biomass are hydrolyzed more easily (i.e., higher sugar yields) than larger particles (in μm, mm and cm range), whereas hydrolysis rates and yields of differently sized particles are comparable after pretreatment [64,65]. Similarly, an extensive mechanical size reduction by milling of spruce wood prior to acid pretreatment does not increase sugar yields in comparison to wood chips [66].

    • Sorghum as a novel biomass for the sustainable production of cellulose nanofibers

      2021, Industrial Crops and Products
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of the dewatering time required to fabricate each nanopaper sample, time ranged between 30 s to 600 s for low energy samples, and 1000s to 5000 s for high energy samples. A factor that has been hypothesised to play a role in the efficiency of nanofibre processing is the particle size of the ground biomass (Oyedeji et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2013). A higher degree of grinding equates to an increased accessibility of the cellulose bundles and a higher surface area substrate for the reagent (2% w/v NaOH) to act upon, which subsequently deconstructs the structure under mechanical processing to form cellulose nanofibres.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 785 532 3436; fax: +1 785 532 3738.

    View full text