International Guideline
International guideline for the delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Target delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) often proves challenging because of the notoriously narrow therapeutic margin. High doses are needed to achieve optimal levels of tumour control, and dosimetric inadequacy remains one of the most important independent factors affecting treatment outcome.

Method

A review of the available literature addressing the natural behaviour of NPC and correlation between clinical and pathological aspects of the disease was conducted. Existing international guidelines as well as published protocols specified by clinical trials on contouring of clinical target volumes (CTV) were compared. This information was then summarized into a preliminary draft guideline which was then circulated to international experts in the field for exchange of opinions and subsequent voting on areas with the greatest controversies.

Results

Common areas of uncertainty and variation in practices among experts experienced in radiation therapy for NPC were elucidated. Iterative revisions were made based on extensive discussion and final voting on controversial areas by the expert panel, to formulate the recommendations on contouring of CTV based on optimal geometric expansion and anatomical editing for those structures with substantial risk of microscopic infiltration.

Conclusion

Through this comprehensive review of available evidence and best practices at major institutions, as well as interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, this set of consensus guidelines has been developed to provide a practical reference for appropriate contouring to ensure optimal target coverage. However, the final decision on the treatment volumes should be based on full consideration of individual patients’ factors and facilities of an individual centre (including the quality of imaging methods and the precision of treatment delivery).

Introduction

Radiation therapy (RT) is the primary treatment modality for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Target delineation in NPC often proves challenging because of the notoriously narrow therapeutic margin. High doses are needed to achieve optimal levels of tumour control, despite the apparent radio-sensitivity of the tumour in many patients. Even in the contemporary era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with extensive use of concurrent chemotherapy, dosimetric inadequacy remains one of the most important independent factors affecting treatment outcome. A study by Ng et al. showed that the 5-year local failure-free rate dropped to 54% if more than 3 cc volume within the gross primary tumour was under-dosed to below 66.5 Gy, compared with 90% in patients with smaller under-dosed volumes (p < 0.001) [1].

With the anatomical proximity of critical organs-at-risk (OARs), the importance of appropriate contouring to attain optimal balance between the risk of tumour recurrence due to marginal miss and the risk of serious late damage cannot be over-emphasized. The first fundamental step is accurate delineation of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) for individual patients based on the best available investigation methods. With the well-known highly infiltrative behaviour of NPC, especially the common non-keratinizing subtype, the next critical step is proper delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) to cover the sites at relatively high risk of microscopic involvement. However, there are marked variations in philosophy and practice among clinicians [2].

The Danish national guidelines for delineation of CTV for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (2013) [3] proposed the concept of isocentric “5 + 5 mm” geometric expansion of the primary tumour Gross Tumour Volume (GTVp), with corrections for natural anatomic boundaries such as bone or air cavities [4]. The principle is to deliver the full therapeutic dose to the CTV1 that covers at least the GTV + 5 mm margin, and a lower (prophylactic or intermediate) dose to the CTV2 that covers CTV1 + an additional 5 mm rim of tissue. The use of these guidelines has led to much more homogeneous target volume delineation among centres, as noted in data collected by Hansen et al. [5]. However, as the editing was mainly proposed for natural boundaries only, it is expected that the Danish national guidelines result in the inclusion of more non-target tissues in the tumour CTV (CTVp) than should ideally be included. Further refinement has recently been initiated by Vincent Grégoire and Cai Grau, to comprehensively review the Danish national guidelines and to edit for each anatomic location within the larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx and oral cavity; and specifically, for each T-category within the TNM staging classification by incorporating knowledge of anatomy and the patterns of spread of disease into the geometric CTV delineation concept [6].

The key objective of this proposed guideline is to develop recommendations on delineation of CTV specific to NPC that will provide clinicians with a practical reference on treatment principles, with a fundamental goal of providing a reference for appropriate contouring to ensure adequate tumour coverage. This document is based on consensus built by review of available evidence, comparison of published guidelines [2], [7], [8], [9] and detailed consideration of opinions and successive rounds of consensus by international experts experienced in the treatment of NPC. This guideline represents the concerted efforts of key oncologists from Asia (China, Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan), Australia, North America (Canada, United States), Saudi Arabia and Europe (Belgium, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Turkey, United Kingdom). The guideline should be applicable for all histological subtypes of NPC.

Section snippets

Acquisition of the planning CT

The patient should typically lie in the supine position on the flat table-top of the simulation CT scanner with the head and neck immobilized in a neutral neck position by a reproducible immobilization device, most commonly a 4–5 fixation point thermoplastic mask covering from skull vertex to shoulder [10].

Thin CT sections (preferably 2 mm thickness) should be acquired typically from vertex to 2 cm below the sternoclavicular joints. We suggest scanning from the vertex in order to include the

Patterns of spread

Nasopharyngeal carcinomas tend to arise from the fossa of Rosenmüller, spreading submucosally with early infiltration of the palatal muscles within the parapharyngeal space. Due to its highly infiltrative nature, it spreads easily through areas of lesser resistance within the pharyngobasilar fascia, and tends to infiltrate along neural pathways. Dubrulle et al. [12] described the routes of tumour extension of NPC based on review of MRI imaging, noting that the routes of spread are often well

Recommendations and consensus guidelines

Although guidelines on target volume delineation of nodal levels have been previously published [39], [40], [41], there have been new studies on refining the selection of levels in node-negative NPC patients [42], [43], [44]. There are also controversies on details of contouring that warrant consideration. Therefore, in this recommendation, we will address some common areas with significant variation among experts for contouring the CTV for nodal coverage.

The diagnostic criteria used for

Discussion on treatment extent after induction chemotherapy

We include a brief discussion on the recommended target volumes for patients with induction chemotherapy given, because this is a common concern particularly for patients with tumour abutting critical OAR. Specific data on clinical–pathological correlation are lacking. This summary of consensus among international experts provides a guidance, but a full analysis is outside the main scope of this paper.

Induction chemotherapy can be a useful modality for NPC, in particular, for those cases where

Concluding remarks

The current study reveals marked variation in philosophy and practice among international experts most experienced in radiation therapy for NPC. This provides a valuable platform for comprehensive review of available evidence and extensive exchange of opinions on various contentious issues to attain consensus on best possible recommendations for contouring of CTV for NPC, While there are limitations where clinical–pathological data specific for NPC are scanty or lacking, this set of consensus

Disclaimer

This set of guidelines is not meant to be a dogmatic protocol. We aim to provide practical suggestions on appropriate of treatment volumes coverage for patients with accurate localization and delineation of gross tumour extent based on optimal investigations. However, wider margins may be needed in cases with sub-optimal imaging or in case of doubt about possible tumour involvement. The final target volumes should be based on full consideration of individual patients’ factors as well as the

Conflicts of interest statement

All authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Author’s contribution

VG, CG conceived of the idea. AWL, WTN, JJP and JTW developed and executed the consensus development. All authors participated in the consensus development. AWL, WTN, JJP, JTW, VG and SSP were involved in the writing phase of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding source

None to declare.

Ethical considerations

None to declare.

References (67)

  • H. Ligtenberg et al.

    Modality-specific target definition for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on FDG-PET, CT and MRI

    Radiother Oncol

    (2017)
  • S.Z. Lai et al.

    How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients?

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2011)
  • G. Peng et al.

    A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Radiother Oncol

    (2012)
  • S. Lin et al.

    Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced volume intensity modulated radiation therapy: report on the 3 year outcome of a prospective series

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • J.N. Waldron et al.

    Ethmoid sinus cancer: twenty-nine cases managed with primary radiation therapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1998)
  • J.N. Waldron et al.

    Carcinoma of the maxillary antrum: A retrospective analysis of 110 cases

    Radiother Oncol

    (2000)
  • V. Gregoire et al.

    State of the art on dose prescription, reporting and recording in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ICRU report No. 83)

    Cancer Radiother

    (2011)
  • V. Gregoire et al.

    CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines

    Radiother Oncol

    (2003)
  • V. Grégoire et al.

    Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines

    Radiother Oncol

    (2014)
  • V. Gregoire et al.

    Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck

    Radiother Oncol

    (2006)
  • A.W. Lee et al.

    Is selective neck irradiation safe for node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2013)
  • J.Z. Chen et al.

    Results of a phase 2 study examining the effects of omitting elective neck irradiation to nodal levels IV and Vb in patients with N(0–1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2013)
  • S. Apisarnthanarax et al.

    Determining optimal clinical target volume margins in head-and-neck cancer based on microscopic extracapsular extension of metastatic neck nodes

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • X.S. Wang et al.

    Study of the medial group retropharyngeal node metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on 3100 newly diagnosed cases

    Oral Oncol

    (2014)
  • L.Z. Liu et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: patterns of spread

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • X.S. Wang et al.

    Patterns of retropharyngeal node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • I. Poon et al.

    A population-based atlas and clinical target volume for the head-and-neck lymph nodes

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Patterns of lymph node metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 2013 updated consensus guidelines for neck node levels

    Radiother Oncol

    (2015)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Patterns of level II node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Radiother Oncol

    (2008)
  • W.T. Ng et al.

    N-staging by magnetic resonance imaging for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: pattern of nodal involvement by radiological levels

    Radiother Oncol

    (2007)
  • S.M. Cao et al.

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Eur J Cancer

    (2017)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2016)
  • J.K. Salama et al.

    Clinical practice guidance for radiotherapy planning after induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • Cited by (211)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These 4 authors contributed equally.

    View full text