Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 150, Issue 3, 15 April 2007, Pages 277-285
Psychiatry Research

Dissociation, memory commission errors, and heightened autonomic reactivity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2006.04.016Get rights and content

Abstract

If dissociative symptoms are manifestations of a psychological defense mechanism, one would expect people who have such symptoms to react with lower levels of physiological arousal and with memory omissions to emotionally provocative material. The current study tested this assumption in a sample of undergraduates. Sixty-two undergraduate students viewed a highly emotional video fragment. Pearson's product–moment correlations were calculated between dissociation (as indexed by the Dissociative Experiences Scale, DES) and all dependent measures. High dissociators exhibited elevated skin conductance responses (SCRs) to the fragment. Memory for the video fragment was then tested. While omission errors were unrelated to dissociation, high dissociators exhibited a tendency to produce commission errors. This could not be explained by a reduced working memory capacity. However, fantasy proneness was found related to high dissociators' commission errors. Thus, it seems that a pattern of heightened emotional reactivity and commission errors is typical for people with elevated dissociation scores. This pattern is difficult to reconcile with the defensive function ascribed to dissociation.

Introduction

According to Bernstein and Putnam (1986, p. 727), dissociation is “a lack of normal integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into the stream of consciousness and memory”. Many authors believe that it “functions to fragmentize, derealize, and depersonalize traumatic experiences” (Markowitsch, 2003, p. S133). Dissociation can be conceptualized as forming a continuum that ranges from the minor dissociation of everyday life to major forms of psychopathology (Fischer and Elnitsky, 1990). Historically, dissociation has been considered a defense mechanism that enables the individual to withdraw psychologically from the impact of overwhelming traumatic events (Gershuny and Thayer, 1999). This view dates back to the 19th century psychologist Pierre Janet (1894), who coined the term “dissociation" and emphasized its role as a defensive maneuver in response to psychological trauma. A habitual tendency to dissociate would, however, promote psychopathology (Hacking, 1995). Following this tradition, recent clinical literature emphasizes the causal relationship between dissociation and trauma (Irvin, 1998, Gershuny and Thayer, 1999, Gast et al., 2001).

While the view that dissociation is caused by exposure to traumatic events is widely accepted, empirical studies providing unequivocal support for this causal direction are still lacking. For example, Zlotnick et al. (1996) found a correlation of 0.40 between dissociation, as measured with the Dissociative Experiences Scale, and their own Sexual Assault Questionnaire (SAQ). Yet, the authors admit that the validity and the reliability of the SAQ are unknown. Similarly, Nash et al. (1993) investigated the link between trauma and dissociation in a sample of 105 women. They found that participants with a self-reported history of sexual abuse endorsed significantly more dissociative symptoms compared with women without such a history. However, this connection disappeared when a measure of family pathology was entered as a covariate in the analysis. This suggests that the connection between trauma and dissociation might be less straightforward than is often thought. This point is emphasized by Mulder et al. (1998), who summarized their findings in a large community study (n = 1000) as follows:

Any causal influence of childhood sexual abuse on dissociation is likely to be indirect and mediated by more general linkages between childhood sexual abuse and risks of mental disorder. (p. 809)

Another study yielding problematic results for the trauma-dissociation hypothesis is that by Sanders and Giolas (1991). These authors found retrospective self-reports of traumatic experiences and dissociative symptoms to be modestly correlated in a sample of adolescent psychiatric patients. Curiously, when hospital records were scored by a “blind” rater for indications of trauma, a slightly negative correlation emerged between ratings of traumatic experiences based on hospital records and dissociation. This suggests that dissociation is related to retrospective self-reports of traumatic experiences, while being unrelated to more objective and specific indices of such experiences. Recently, Merckelbach and Jelicic (2004) offered an explanation for this phenomenon. In two samples of undergraduate students (n = 43 and n = 127), they found that dissociative experiences are related to the endorsement of vague, but not specific trauma items. This response tendency might also have played a role in other studies that found a link between dissociation and trauma as measured by retrospective self-report scales of traumatic experiences.

Mild dissociative symptoms are rather common in the general population, with 80% to 90% of the respondents indicating that they sometimes experience these symptoms (Gershuny and Thayer, 1999). This is difficult to reconcile with the alleged traumatic etiology of dissociative symptoms, which implies that they should have a lower base rate. In addition, Lang et al. (1998) investigated the influence of heritability on dissociative experiences using a twin study. They report that about half of the variability in dissociative experiences can be attributed to heritability. The evidence concerning the genetic predisposition of dissociative experiences is, however, mixed, as another study (Waller and Ross, 1997) reports no genetic influence, while a recent study in children and adolescents lends support to the notion of a genetic predisposition of dissociation (Becker-Blease et al., 2004). Thus, the high prevalence and the possible heritable basis of dissociative phenomena make a direct causal link between dissociation and trauma less likely. It also underlines the importance of a different research perspective, namely one that focuses on the trait-like features of dissociation. One robust finding in this domain is that there exists a substantial overlap between dissociation and fantasy proneness (Rauschenberger and Lynn, 1995, Merckelbach et al., 2000, Waldo and Merritt, 2000). Fantasy proneness refers to a deep and extensive involvement in fantasizing and daydreaming (Merckelbach and Muris, 2001). While fantasy proneness is integral to healthy psychological functioning, an inability to control the cognitive processes implicated in imaginative involvement may be associated with psychopathology (Rauschenberger and Lynn, 1995). Fantasy proneness has repeatedly been shown to be related to dissociation in both clinical (Pekala et al., 1999–2000, Merckelbach et al., 2005) and non-clinical samples (Merckelbach et al., 1999, Merckelbach et al., 2000) with correlations ranging from 0.41 (Pekala et al., 1999–2000) to 0.55 (Merckelbach et al., 2000).

Given the fact that fantasy proneness is associated with susceptibility to pseudo-memories, dissociation might also be related to a tendency to confabulate. Evidence for this comes from a study by Merckelbach et al. (2000). Participants watched 40 slides, with 20 depicting photographs of common objects or situations and the other 20 being a short paragraph describing a scene or situation. Following this, participants were given a surprise recognition test in which they had to identify slides they had seen earlier in a series of old and new slides. They also had to indicate whether they had seen the “old” slide as a photograph or a paragraph. Two types of errors may occur during this task. Participants may erroneously confuse a picture with a text or vice versa. This would be a reality-monitoring error. Participants might also claim that they recognize a slide, which was not presented earlier. This would be a pseudo-memory, i.e., a commission error. Dissociative experiences were found to be related to commission errors, but not to reality-monitoring errors.

In a more recent study, Candel et al. (2003) examined memory-commission errors in a sample of undergraduate students scoring either high (n = 19) or low (n = 19) on the DES. The authors presented an emotional narrative to the participants, who then had to complete a free-recall task. Dissociation was associated with commission errors, but not with the proportion of correct recall, with high dissociators committing significantly more commission errors than low dissociators. In contrast to other studies (Merckelbach et al., 2000), the link between dissociation and commission errors was not mediated by fantasy proneness. This, however, might have been due to the limited sample size in the Candel et al. (2003) study.

Our study attempted to replicate the findings of Candel et al. (2003), but also tried to extend our understanding as to why commission errors are associated with heightened dissociation. One possibility is that this association has to do with high dissociators suffering from limited working memory capacity. A limited working memory capacity might hamper encoding, leading to gaps in memory (Brewin and Saunders, 2001), which are later filled in by participants, thereby leading to confabulations. Thus, the first issue examined in the current study is whether high dissociators' commission errors are related to working memory problems.

A second issue addressed by our study has to do with the defensive function that is often ascribed to dissociative experiences (Gershuny and Thayer, 1999). If this idea is correct, one would hypothesize that high dissociators show fewer hits on a memory task for emotional material (i.e., one would expect more omission errors), as one of the core features of dissociation is psychogenic amnesia (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). During exposure to the emotion-provoking material, one would also expect them to exhibit attenuated skin conductance responses as compared with low dissociators (e.g., Simeon, 2004). That is, one would predict that high dissociators could withdraw themselves psychologically from emotional events. Alternatively, if dissociative experiences and fantasy proneness described a common domain, high dissociators' skin conductance responses would be more pronounced as compared with those of low dissociators due to their more pronounced imaginative involvement in the emotional material (Candel and Merckelbach, 2003).

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 62 undergraduate students enrolled at Maastricht University. Forty-five of them were women. Their mean age was 19.03 years (S.D. = 1.56, range = 17 to 26 years). Participants were compensated through course credit points and gave written consent prior to taking part. The study was approved by the local ethical committee.

Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES; Cronbach's α = 0.92)

The DES (Bernstein and Putnam, 1986) is a self-report scale asking respondents to indicate on 100-mm visual analogue scales to what extent they experience 28

Individual differences measures

Mean DES and CEQ scores were 17.86 (S.D. = 10.46) and 7.22 (S.D. = 3.73), respectively. These scores correspond with values that previous studies reported for student samples (Merckelbach et al., 2002). Table 1 presents Pearson's product–moment correlations between the DES, the CEQ, and performance on the digit span task.

As can be seen, there was a significant correlation between DES and CEQ scores. Thus, participants who reported more dissociative experiences exhibited stronger tendencies to

Discussion

The most important findings of the current study can be catalogued as follows. To begin with, heightened dissociation was related to commission errors during the free-recall task. Dissociation was, however, completely unrelated to the proportion of hits (i.e., accurate information elements). Secondly, in contrast to Candel et al. (2003), a mediator analysis revealed a trend for the link between commission errors and dissociation to be partially mediated by fantasy proneness during free recall.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Dutch organisation for scientific research N.W.O., Grant No. 402-01-088-D. We thank Bob Wilkinson for his helpful comment on an early version of this article.

References (58)

  • H. Merckelbach et al.

    The Creative Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ): a brief self-report measure of fantasy proneness

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2001)
  • H. Merckelbach et al.

    Modeling the connection between self-reported trauma and dissociation in a student sample

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2002)
  • H. Merckelbach et al.

    Dissociation and fantasy proneness in psychiatric patients: a preliminary study

    Comprehensive Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • J. Modestin et al.

    Testing the dissociative taxon

    Psychiatry Research

    (2004)
  • M.H. van Ijzendoorn et al.

    The measurement of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES)

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1996)
  • D. Watson

    To dream, perchance to remember: individual differences in dream recall

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2003)
  • C. Zlotnick et al.

    The relationship between dissociative symptoms, alexithymia, impulsivity, sexual abuse, and self-mutilation

    Comprehensive Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1994)
  • R. Baron et al.

    The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • K.A. Becker-Blease et al.

    A genetic analysis of individual differences in dissociative behaviors in childhood and adolescence

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

    (2004)
  • E.M. Bernstein et al.

    Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (1986)
  • C.R. Brewin et al.

    The effect of dissociation at encoding on intrusive memories for a stressful film

    British Journal of Medical Psychology

    (2001)
  • P. Chodoff

    The diagnosis of hysteria: an overview

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1974)
  • M. Cima et al.

    Frontal lobe dysfunctions, dissociation, and trauma self-reports in forensic psychiatric patients

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (2001)
  • R. Dow

    Psylab (Version 7)

    (1997)
  • D.G. Fischer et al.

    A factor analytic study of two scales measuring dissociation

    American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

    (1990)
  • D.C. Fowles

    The three arousal model: implications of Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy

    Psychophysiology

    (1980)
  • P.A. Frazier et al.

    Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research

    Journal of Counseling Psychology

    (2004)
  • U. Gast et al.

    Prevalence of dissociative disorders among psychiatric inpatients in a German university clinic

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text