Short communication
Intra-accumbal blockade of endocannabinoid CB1 receptors impairs learning but not retention of conditioned relief

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.06.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Relief learning is associating a stimulus with the offset of an aversive event.

  • We tested whether accumbal CB1 receptors are involved in relief learning.

  • Injections of a CB1 receptor antagonist blocked relief learning in rats.

  • Already established relief memory was not affected by these injections.

Abstract

Humans and animals are able to associate an environmental cue with the feeling of relief from an aversive event, a phenomenon called relief learning. Relief from an aversive event is rewarding and a relief-associated cue later induces an attenuation of the startle magnitude or approach behavior. Previous studies demonstrated that the nucleus accumbens is essential for relief learning. Here, we asked whether accumbal cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors are involved in relief learning. In rats, we injected the CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A (rimonabant) directly into the nucleus accumbens at different time points during a relief learning experiment. SR141716A injections immediately before the conditioning inhibited relief learning. However, SR141716A injected immediately before the retention test was not effective when conditioning was without treatment. These findings indicate that accumbal CB1 receptors play an important role in the plasticity processes underlying relief learning.

Introduction

A basic motivation of animals and humans is to avoid potentially threatening events since this can have critical impact on the well-being or survival of the organism (Lang et al., 2000, LeDoux, 2012). While experiencing a threatening event is highly aversive, the relief from such an incident is rewarding (Leknes et al., 2011, Seymour et al., 2005). Notably, animals and humans can associate this rewarding feeling with environmental cues, a phenomenon entitled ‘Relief Learning’ (Denny, 1971, Gerber et al., 2014). In experimental paradigms of relief learning, a conditioned relief stimulus induces behavioral changes such as approach behavior or attenuation of the startle response (Andreatta et al., 2012, Navratilova et al., 2012, Yarali et al., 2008). These behavioral changes are usually observed in the presence of appetitive stimuli (e.g., Conzelmann et al., 2009, Friederich et al., 2006, Lang et al., 1990, Schmid et al., 1995, Schneider and Spanagel, 2008). A series of studies in humans and rodents demonstrated that the nucleus accumbens (NAC), a central part of the brain reward system (e.g., Ikemoto, 2007), is crucial for relief learning in mammals (Andreatta et al., 2012, Bergado Acosta et al., 2017, Bruning et al., 2016, Kahl and Fendt, 2016, Leknes et al., 2011, Mohammadi et al., 2014, Mohammadi and Fendt, 2015, Navratilova et al., 2012).

At the level of the NAC, the endocannabinoid (eCB) system, and in particular cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors, has been reported to act as a fundamental mediator of the encoding of reward and incentive cues by allowing neural synchrony and rhythmicity patterns to emerge during reinforcement processes (Hernandez & Cheer, 2012). The eCB system is an evolutionarily ancient and widely distributed neuromodulatory system (Elphick, 2012) which is critically involved in the regulation and modulation of a plethora of neurophysiological processes, such as motor control, emotional homeostasis, memory storage, or reward processing (Kano et al., 2009, Moreira and Lutz, 2008).

The present study was performed to address the hypothesis whether accumbal CB1 receptors are involved in relief learning. In experiment 1, we submitted animals to different conditioning procedures to demonstrate that the startle attenuation that is observed in relief conditioning experiments is due to the associative status of the conditioned relief stimulus. In two further experiments, we injected the CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A (rimonabant) directly into the NAC of rats. In experiment 2, we evaluated the role of accumbal CB1 receptors on the acquisition of conditioned relief, i.e. injections were performed immediately before relief learning and the retention test on learned relief was performed without injections. In experiment 3, the role of accumbal CB1 receptors on the expression of conditioned relief was evaluated, i.e. rats were submitted to relief learning without any treatment and SR141716A injections were performed immediately before the retention test on learned relief.

Section snippets

Subjects

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–350 g) were used for the present experiment. They were kept in groups of 4–6 animals per cage under a light:dark cycle of 12 h:12 h (lights on 6:00 am) and had free access to water and food. All experiments and surgeries were done during the light phase. The experiments were performed in accordance with international guidelines for the use of animals in experiments (2010/63/EU) and were approved by the local ethical committee (Landesverwaltungsamt Sachsen-Anhalt, Az.

Experiment 1: associative character of the relief CS

Fig. 2A depicts the startle magnitudes in the two different startle trial types, i.e. in the absence (startle alone) or presence (CS-startle) of the light stimulus, before the animals were submitted to different conditioning protocols. Light stimulus did not affect the startle magnitude (t-test: t = 0.42, P = 0.67).

This was different in the startle tests which were performed after the rats have been submitted to different conditioning protocols. An ANOVA revealed a significant interaction of

Discussion

Taken together, the present study shows that accumbal CB1 receptors are involved in the acquisition but not expression of conditioned relief. The latter finding, together with the observation that locomotor response to foot shocks was not affected by intra-accumbal SR141716A injections, implies that blockade of relief learning is not caused by general deficits in sensory processing of the US or CS after blockade of accumbal CB1 receptors.

In the current study we used the acoustic startle

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB779/B13). The authors are grateful to Evelyn Kahl, Dana Meyer and Kathrin Freke for excellent technical assistance and Judith Kreutzmann for language editing and helpful comment to the manuscript.

References (47)

  • J.H. Martin

    Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat

    Neuroscience Letters

    (1991)
  • M. Mohammadi et al.

    Relief learning is distinguished from safety learning by the requirement of the nucleus accumbens

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2014)
  • D.D. Pollak et al.

    An animal model of a behavioral intervention for depression

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • M.T. Rogan et al.

    Distinct neural signatures for safety and danger in the amygdala and striatum of the mouse

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • A. Schmid et al.

    Conditioned pleasure attenuates the startle response in rats

    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

    (1995)
  • M. Schneider et al.

    Appetitive odor-cue conditioning attenuates the acoustic startle response in rats

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2008)
  • D.J. Surmeier et al.

    D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor modulation of striatal glutamatergic signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (2007)
  • A. Yarali et al.

    ‘Pain relief' learning in fruit flies

    Animal Behavior

    (2008)
  • D.S. Zahm et al.

    On the significance of subterritories in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum

    Neuroscience

    (1992)
  • M. Andreatta et al.

    Onset and offset of aversive events establish distinct memories requiring fear- and reward networks

    Learning & Memory

    (2012)
  • F. Brischoux et al.

    Phasic excitation of dopamine neurons in ventral VTA by noxious stimuli

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2009)
  • C. Cohen et al.

    SR141716, a central cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonist, blocks the motivational and dopamine-releasing effects of nicotine in rats

    Behavioural Pharmacology

    (2002)
  • M. Davis et al.

    Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: Effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

    (1978)
  • Cited by (3)

    • The interaction effect of sleep deprivation and cannabinoid type 1 receptor in the CA1 hippocampal region on passive avoidance memory, depressive-like behavior and locomotor activity in rats

      2021, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, a low dose of AM251 blocks the impairment effect of URB597 (fatty acid amide hydrolase “FAAH” inhibitor) on fear memory retrieval [25]. Note that, the exact role of cannabinoids in different functions especially learning and memory is so inconsistent and many contradictory results have been reported, including the impairment effect of CB1r antagonists on learning and memory [26,27], or the similar effect of CB1r antagonists with CB1r agonists [22,28,29]. Additionally, both sleep and eCB system are involved in anxiety and depressive symptoms.

    View full text