Motion adaptation and attention: A critical review and meta-analysis☆
Section snippets
Background
Attention refers to our ability to selectively process certain aspects of a visual scene, such that particular regions or features are enhanced, and irrelevant stimuli are inhibited (Carrasco, 2011). The effects of attention on perceptual processes are usually measured via manipulations of covert attention in which attention is directed independently of eye movements. This contrasts with overt attention, in which a redirection of attention is accompanied by an eye movement to fixate the
Inclusion criteria
All studies that met the following criteria were included in the present meta-analysis:
- 1
The study manipulated attention during motion adaptation and reported the subsequent behavioural motion aftereffect.
- 2
The stimuli did not differ across attentional manipulations.
- 3
The study was published in an English language journal on or before August 2016.
- 4
Participants were healthy human adults – studies using patient populations were excluded.
- 5
The study was not a re-analysis of existing data
- 6
Sufficient
Summary of included data
In total, 29 studies were analysed, involving 229 participants across 37 independent samples, yielding 76 effect size estimates. These effect size estimates, and the studies from which they originated are provided in Table 1. Detailed information about each effect is available in the Supplementary Material S1. Two effect sizes were more than ± 3 SDs from the mean. However, removing these outliers reduced the overall effect size by only 0.04 and all significant moderators remained significant.
Summary of findings
Attending to a moving stimulus significantly increases the resultant MAE. This effect of attention is modulated by various characteristics of the adaptation and test stimuli: larger attentional effects were found following adaptation to stimuli that were (i) translating (vs. those with complex motion trajectories) (ii) at a greater eccentricity and (iii) smaller in size. In addition, when considering multiple moderators simultaneously, stronger attentional modulation was reported in studies
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis supports a number of conclusions. First, there is overwhelming evidence that motion adaptation is affected by attention. By analysing the effects of different paradigms, participant naivety and looking for evidence of the ‘file drawer’ effect, we can be confident that reported effects are not driven by response bias or publication bias. It seems that Wohlgemuth (1911) was wrong after all. More importantly, we identified several factors that modulate the effects of attention on
References (91)
- et al.
Adaptation to spiral motion: global but not local motion detectors are modulated by attention
Vis. Res.
(2005) - et al.
Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+
Cogn. Brain Res.
(2002) - et al.
Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect
Vis. Res.
(1993) - et al.
Maximal motion aftereffects in spite of diverted awareness
Vis. Res.
(2009) - et al.
Motion psychophysics: 1985-2010
Vis. Res.
(2011) Visual attention: the past 25 years
Vis. Res.
(2011)- et al.
Independent aftereffects of attention and motion
Neuron
(2000) - et al.
Effects of spatial attention and salience cues on chromatic and achromatic motion processing
Vis. Res.
(2007) Linear and rotation motion aftereffects as a function of inspection duration
Vis. Res.
(1993)- et al.
Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex
Curr. Biol.
(2006)
Deciding what to see: the role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion
Vis. Res.
Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque
Neuron
Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion
Vis. Res.
Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load
Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.)
The functional architecture of human visual motion perception
Vis. Res.
The motion aftereffect reloaded
Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.)
Feature-based attention in visual cortex
Trends Neurosci.
Motion adaptation does not depend on attention to the adaptor
Vision Res.
Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect
Vis. Res.
Differential effect of attention to translation and expansion on motion aftereffects (MAE)
Vis. Res.
Biological image motion processing: a review
Vis. Res.
A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects
Vis. Res.
Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test
Vis. Res.
Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing
Vis. Res.
Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST
Neuron
Selective attention and cyclopean motion processing
Vis. Res.
Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task
Neuropsychologia
Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments
Vis. Res.
Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms
Vision Res.
Attention to surfaces modulates motion processing in extrastriate area MT
Neuron
An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body
London Edinburgh Philos. Mag. J. Sci.
Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation
Nat. Neurosci.
GraphClick 3.0.2
The effects of attention and adaptation duration on the motion aftereffect
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas
J. Neurophysiol.
Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression
Nature
Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study
Brain
Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention
Nature
Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: a structural equation modeling approach
Psychol. Methods
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Understanding the New Statistics
Motion coherence and conjunction search: implications for guided search theory
Percept. Psychophys.
A nonparametric “Trim and Fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis
Biometrics
Cited by (2)
- ☆
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
- 1
Present address: School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AL, England, UK.