Kontakt 2017, 19(2):e75-e85 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.03.002

Empirical evaluation of the changes in public health nursing interventions after the implementation of an evidence-based family home visiting guidelineNursing - Original article

Karen A. Monsena,*, Sadie M. Swensonb, Lisa Klotzbachb, Michelle A. Mathiasona, Karen E. Johnsonc
a University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA
b Olmsted County Minnesota, Department of Public Health, Rochester, MN, USA
c University of Texas-Austin, School of Nursing, Austin, TX, USA

The objective of this quality evaluation was to evaluate the changes in public health nursing (PHN) interventions after the implementation of an evidence-based family home visiting (EB-FHV) guideline encoded using the Omaha System.
Design and sample: This quality improvement evaluation was conducted using a secondary dataset of 27,910 PHN family home visiting interventions from visits to 129 adult clients enrolled in EB-FHV programs in a Midwestern PHN agency. The interventions were documented 12 months before and 14 months after EB-FHV Guideline implementation. The EB-FHV consisted of 94 PHN interventions for 10 Omaha System problems, with electronic health record (EHR) data generated by PHNs during routine clinical documentation. Standard descriptive and inferential statistics were employed in the analysis.
Measures: The Omaha System was used to compare PHN practice before and after the guideline implementation.

Results: Documentation patterns revealed that PHNs tailored interventions while also shifting toward the use of the EB-FHV guideline interventions. Ten EB-FHV problems accounted for 96.3% of interventions documented before and 98.5% of interventions documented after implementation. The proportion of interventions before and after EB-FHV by problem differed significantly for all problems except Substance use. Fewer interventions were provided after EB-FHV for the primary problems of Pregnancy and Postpartum, with a shift to more interventions for Caretaking/parenting.

Conclusion: The PHN documentation demonstrated an adherence to the EB-FHV guideline, while tailoring the evidence-based interventions differentially by problem. Further research is needed to extend this quality improvement approach to other guidelines and populations.

Keywords: Family home visiting; Omaha System; Intervention; Guideline

Received: December 26, 2016; Revised: February 3, 2017; Accepted: March 9, 2017; Published: June 26, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Monsen KA, Swenson SM, Klotzbach L, Mathiason MA, Johnson KE. Empirical evaluation of the changes in public health nursing interventions after the implementation of an evidence-based family home visiting guideline. Kontakt. 2017;19(2):e75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.03.002.
Download citation

References

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Partnership for Action to End Health Disparities. National stakeholder strategy for achieving health equity, 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/
  2. World Health Organization. Global health observatory data: Maternal and reproductive health, 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/en/
  3. Anderson KM. How far have we come in reducing health disparities? Progress since 2000: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
  4. Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioural domains in electronic health records: Phase 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
  5. Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioural domains and measures in electronic health records: Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
  6. World Health Organization. What are social determinants of health? 2012. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/sdh_definition/en/
  7. World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publicati
  8. Kamerman SB, Kahn AJ. Home health visiting in Europe. Future of Children 1993;3(3):39-52. Go to original source...
  9. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting; 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: https://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-child-health-initiatives/home-visiting-overview
  10. Monsen KA, Swenson SM, Kerr MJ. The perceptions of public health nurses on using standardized care plans to translate evidence-based guidelines into family home visiting practice. Kontakt 2016;18(2): e75-e83. Go to original source...
  11. Omaha System Guidelines. Evidence-based family home visiting interventions; 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16553143/gl/FHV.xlsx
  12. Martin KS. The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (Reprinted 2nd ed.). Omaha, NE: Health Connections Press; 2005.
  13. Monsen KA, Fitzsimmons LL, Lescenski BA, Lytton AB, Schwichtenberg LD, Martin KS. A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project. Comput Inform Nurs 2006;24(3):152-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Monsen KA, Fulkerson JA, Lytton AB, Taft LL, Schwichtenberg LD, Martin KS. Comparing maternal child health problems and outcomes across public health nursing agencies. Matern Child Health J 2010;14(3):412-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Monsen KA, Elsbernd SA, Barnhart L, Stock J, Prock CE, Looman WS, Nardella M. A statewide case management, surveillance, and outcome evaluation system for children with special health care Needs. ISRN Nurs 2013;2013:793936. Doi: 10.1155/2013/793936. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Monsen K, Sanders A, Yu F, Radosevich D, Geppert J. Family home visiting outcomes for mothers with and without intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2011;55(5):484-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Monsen KA, Chatterjee SB, Timm JE, Poulsen JK, McNaughton DB. Factors explaining variability in health literacy outcomes of public health nursing clients. Public Health Nurs 2015;32(2);94-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Monsen KA, Radosevich DM, Kerr MJ, Fulkerson JA. Public health nurses tailor home visiting interventions. Public Health Nurs 2011;28(2): 119-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Olsen JM, Thorson D, Baisch MJ, Monsen KA. Using Omaha System documentation to understand physical activity among rural women. Public Health Nurs 2017;34(1):31-41. Doi: 10.1111/phn.12264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. American Nurses Association. ANA recognized terminologies that support nursing practice, 2012. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Tools/Recognized-Nursing-Practice-Terminologies.pdf
  21. Monsen KA, Kapinos N, Rudenick JM, Warmbold K, McMahon SK, Schorr EN. Social determinants documentation in electronic health records with and without standardized terminologies. West J Nurs Res 2016;38(10):1399-400. Doi: 10.1177/0193945916658208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Mehta R, Radhakrishnan NS, Warring CD, Jain A, Fuentes J, Dolganiuc A, et al. The use of evidence-based, problem-oriented templates as a clinical decision support in an inpatient electronic health record system. App Clin Inform 2016;7(3):790-802. Doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Monsen KA, Neely C, Oftedahl G, Kerr MJ, Pietruszewski P, Farri O. Feasibility of encoding the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement Depression Guideline using the Omaha System. J Biomed Inform 2012;45(4):719-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Krumholz HM. Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system. Health Aff 2014;33(7):1163-70. Doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Harding K, Galano J, Martin J, Huntington L, Schellenbach CJ. Healthy Families America effectiveness: a comprehensive review of outcomes. J Prev Interv Community 2007;34(1-2):149-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. LeCroy CW, Davis MF. Randomized trial of healthy families Arizona: quantitative and qualitative outcomes. Res Soc Work Pract 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731516632594
  27. United States Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Evidence of Home Visiting Effectiveness, 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/Model/1/Healthy-Families-America-HFA-In-Brief/10
  28. PH-Doc Software. Software for local public health agencies; 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://ph-doc.net/
  29. Omaha System Community of Practice, 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://omahasystemmn.org/index.php
  30. IBM Software, SPSS Statistics. 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-12-26]. Available from: http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/spss-statistics
  31. Monsen KA, Farri O, McNaughton DB, Savik K. Problem stabilization: a metric for problem improvement in home visiting clients. Appl Clin Inf 2011;2(4):437-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...