Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 405, Issue 3, 21 January 2011, Pages 696-706
Journal home page for Journal of Molecular Biology

Synaptotagmin 1 and SNAREs Form a Complex That Is Structurally Heterogeneous

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Synaptotagmin 1 (syt1) functions as a Ca2+-sensor for neuronal exocytosis. Here, site-directed spin labeling was used to examine the complex formed between a soluble fragment of syt1, which contains its two C2 domains, and the neuronal core soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex. Changes in electron paramagnetic resonance lineshape and accessibility for spin-labeled syt1 mutants indicate that in solution, the assembled core SNARE complex contacts syt1 in several regions. For the C2B domain, contact occurs in the polybasic face and sites opposite the Ca2+-binding loops. For the C2A domain, contact is seen with the SNARE complex in a region near loop 2. Double electron-electron resonance was used to estimate distances between the two C2 domains of syt1. These distances have broad distributions in solution, which do not significantly change when syt1 is fully associated with the core SNARE complex. The broad distance distributions indicate that syt1 is structurally heterogeneous when bound to the SNAREs and does not assume a well-defined structure. Simulated annealing using electron paramagnetic resonance-derived distance restraints produces a family of syt1 structures where the Ca2+-binding regions of each domain face in roughly opposite directions. The results suggest that when associated with the SNAREs, syt1 is configured to bind opposing bilayers, but that the syt1/SNARE complex samples multiple conformational states.

Research Highlights

► Synaptotagmin 1 is structurally heterogeneous when bound to SNAREs. ► When bound to SNAREs, C2A and C2B are aligned to bind opposing bilayers. ► SNAREs interact with synaptotagmin 1 at multiple sites on both C2A and C2B.

Introduction

In the central nervous system, the release of neurotransmitter occurs through a highly regulated Ca2+-dependent membrane fusion event that releases the contents of the synaptic vesicle into the synaptic cleft. Although a large number of proteins act to facilitate this fusion process, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins are thought to make up the core of the fusion machinery. SNAREs include plasma membrane-associated syntaxin, vesicle-associated synaptobrevin, and SNAP-25,1 and they form a four-helix bundle that acts to drive the vesicle and plasma membranes together.2, 3 However, SNAREs are not directly responsible for sensing Ca2+, and in neuronal exocytosis, there is compelling evidence that synaptotagmin 1 (syt1) functions as a Ca2+ sensor and is responsible for the fast synchronous release of neurotransmitter.4, 5, 6

Synaptotagmin 1 is one of several proteins, including complexins, Munc18, and CAPS, which regulate fusion and/or assembly of the SNARE complex. At the present time, the mechanisms and points at which these proteins function are not precisely known. Synaptotagmin 1 binds and penetrates membranes in a Ca2+-dependent manner,7, 8 and it has been observed to bind the assembled SNARE complex5, 9 as well as the individual SNARE proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25.10, 11, 12 A current popular view in the field is that fusion is controlled by SNARE zippering,1 which is generally believed to proceed from the N-terminal to the C-terminal membrane anchors of syntaxin and synaptobrevin, ultimately forming a close junction between opposing membranes. However, it is not known whether syt1 acts to regulate and facilitate SNARE assembly or whether it acts on the membrane interface to assist the SNAREs in overcoming energetic barriers to membrane fusion.

Several distinctly different mechanisms for syt1 function have been proposed. For example, syt1 might regulate fusion by interacting with the SNAREs or intermediates in the SNARE assembly process, and it has been proposed to interact with individual SNAREs and promote SNARE assembly.13 In some measurements, complexin is observed to be inhibitory to the fusion process, and syt1 has been proposed to act by displacing complexin from the SNARE complex upon the arrival of a Ca2+ signal, thereby promoting zippering of the SNARE complex.14 It has been reported that syt1 forms a ternary complex with SNAREs and membranes in the presence of Ca2+,15 and it has been proposed that syt1 might act in such a complex by stabilizing the SNAREs and by facilitating their zippering on the membrane surface.16 Synaptotagmin 1 has also been observed to bridge bilayers17, 18, 19 and to promote the aggregation of vesicles in a Ca2+-dependent manner; a process that might facilitate the formation of a close junction between vesicle and plasma membranes. Synaptotagmin also perturbs bilayers, and it has been proposed to act by altering bilayer curvature and assisting in the formation of the hemi-fusion intermediate.20

At the present time, there is limited structural information to support the specific models that have been proposed. Crystal structures for the assembled core SNARE complex,2 a SNARE–complexin complex,21 as well as the fully zippered SNARE complex containing the transmembrane segments are available.22 There are also crystal structures and solution NMR structures for the individual C2 domains of syntaptotagmin 1,23, 24 as well as a crystal structure for a soluble fragment of syt1 containing the two C2 domains (syt1C2AB).25 Information on syt1 associated with SNAREs or membranes and SNAREs is more limited and has been challenging to obtain. Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy have provided information on how the C2 domains of synaptotagmin 1 are positioned on the membrane interface and penetrate bilayers,8, 26, 27 and these data are qualitatively consistent with the results of fluorescence spectroscopy.7 Continuous-wave (CW) EPR28 as well as long-range distance constraints from pulse EPR show that the two domains in syt1C2AB are flexibly linked in solution and remain flexibly linked when bound to bilayers.19 EPR-derived restraints for membrane-associated C2AB demonstrate that it bridges bilayers, and the structures that best satisfy the distance constraints orient the two C2 domains so that their Ca2+-binding loops associate with opposing bilayers.19 Recent single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) data are generally consistent with these EPR data and indicate that the two domains are flexibly linked.29

A number of approaches have been used to investigate the syt1–SNARE interaction. NMR chemical shift changes in 15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectra of syt1C2AB indicate that, in solution, syt1 interacts with the assembled SNARE complex primarily through the polybasic face of the C2B domain of syt1.15 This interaction is also seen by CW EPR in solution where immobilization of spin labels in the polybasic face of C2B is observed due to tertiary contact of the SNAREs with this face of C2B.28 More recent measurements using smFRET suggest that an important interaction between the SNAREs and syt1 takes place on C2B at a site opposite the Ca2+-binding loops (Fig. 1), and that the two domains are positioned to interact with the same membrane surface.29 This work supports a hypothesis where syt1 acts upon bilayers while simultaneously interacting with SNAREs. However, these measurements were carried out on a supported bilayer surface that contained only phosphatidylcholine and lacked negatively charged lipids, such as phosphatidylserine. Thus, membrane attachment of the C2 domains syt1 should not take place under the conditions of these experiments.

In the present work, we present the results of both CW and pulse EPR measurements of the interaction between syt1 and the soluble core SNARE complex. The data indicate that in solution, the two C2 domains remain flexibly linked when bound to the SNAREs, consistent with the previous smFRET result. However, simulated annealing using the EPR-derived distance constraints indicates that the most populated structure for syt1C2AB when associated with the SNAREs is one where the two C2 domains face in opposite directions. A scan of sites around the surface of syt1C2AB indicates that the polybasic face of C2B is an important site of contact with the SNAREs, although several other points of contact between syt1C2AB and the SNAREs are detected. It was not possible to dock syt1 to the SNAREs and satisfy the observed points of contact, a result which indicates that the syt1/SNARE complex samples multiple conformational states. The implications of these findings for syt1-mediated membrane fusion are discussed.

Section snippets

EPR spectra provide evidence for multiple sites of contact between syt1C2AB and the soluble core–SNARE complex

EPR spectra from the spin-labeled side chain, R1, are sensitive to the local environment at the labeled site. Lineshapes are influenced by the steric interactions made by R1, by the backbone dynamics of the site to which R1 is attached, and by polarity.30, 31, 32 Because the EPR spectrum is sensitive tertiary contact of the nitroxide side chain, protein–protein interactions have been successfully probed by SDSL and EPR spectroscopy.33, 34 Here, the spin-labeled side chain R1 was incorporated

Discussion

In spite of a significant level of effort, the mechanism by which syt1 mediates Ca2+-triggered synchronous neurotransmitter release is not well understood. In part, this difficulty is due to the fact that syt1 makes interactions with both bilayers and SNAREs and the fact that conventional methods have failed to provide a structure for the syt1–SNARE complex. In the work presented here, we examined the interactions between syt1 and the core SNARE complex using SDSL and determined an average

Mutagenesis, protein expression, and purification

DNA of rat syt1 (P21707) was obtained from Dr. Carl Creutz (Pharmacology Department, University of Virginia) in the pGEX-KG vector encoding amino acid residues 96−421 (syt1C2AB).45 The single native cysteine residue at position 277 was mutated to alanine by typical PCR strategies. A QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used to produce single- and double-cysteine mutants of C2AB, and all cysteine substitutions were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

The expression

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Christian Altenbach (UCLA) for providing the LabVIEW programs used to process and simulate EPR spectra. We also acknowledge the assistance of the laboratories of Lukas Tamm (University of Virginia) and Reinhard Jahn (Max-Plank-Institute Göttingen, Germany) for help with the expression, purification, and reconstitution of the soluble SNARE complex. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, NIGMS, GM 072694.

References (51)

  • ColumbusL. et al.

    A new spin on protein dynamics

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (2002)
  • FanucciG.E. et al.

    Recent advances and applications of site-directed spin labeling

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2006)
  • CraneJ.M. et al.

    Mapping of the docking of SecA onto the chaperone SecB by site-directed spin labeling: insight into the mechanism of ligand transfer during protein export

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2005)
  • BudilD.E. et al.

    Nonlinear-least-squares analysis of slow-motion EPR spectra in one and two dimensions using a modified Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

    J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A

    (1996)
  • DamerC.K. et al.

    Synergistic membrane interactions of the two C2 domains of synaptotagmin

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • PannierM. et al.

    Dead-Time Free Measurement of Dipole-Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2000)
  • SchwietersC.D. et al.

    Using Xplor-NIH for NMR molecular structure determination

    Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.

    (2006)
  • SchwietersC.D. et al.

    The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2003)
  • JahnR. et al.

    SNAREs—engines for membrane fusion

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2006)
  • SuttonR.B. et al.

    Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution

    Nature

    (1998)
  • BroseN. et al.

    Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface

    Science

    (1992)
  • BaiJ. et al.

    PIP2 increases the speed of response of synaptotagmin and steers its membrane-penetration activity toward the plasma membrane

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.

    (2004)
  • HerrickD.Z. et al.

    Position of synaptotagmin I at the membrane interface: cooperative interactions of tandem C2 domains

    Biochemistry

    (2006)
  • ChapmanE.R.

    How does synaptotagmin trigger neurotransmitter release?

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (2008)
  • TuckerW.C. et al.

    Role of synaptotagmin in Ca2+-triggered exocytosis

    Biochem. J.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (31)

    • PI(4,5)P<inf>2</inf>-binding effector proteins for vesicle exocytosis

      2015, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Membrane bridging would promote proximity of vesicle and plasma membrane SNARE proteins for complex assembly for fusion. In addition, synaptotagmin-1 interacts directly with SNARE protein complexes potentially promoting C-terminal zippering of SNARE complexes [133–138]. Some studies indicate that the polybasic region in C2B mediates SNARE binding by synaptotagmin-1 [139,140] but it appears that SNARE binding and PI(4,5)P2 associations can occur simultaneously [80,114,119].

    • Calcium binding promotes conformational flexibility of the neuronal Ca<sup>2+</sup> sensor synaptotagmin

      2015, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, a crystallography study (23) revealed tightly interacting domains, whereas optical studies suggested that in the solution C2 domains do not interact and can rotate freely (26). Furthermore, electron paramagnetic resonance studies suggest that Syt1 remains structurally heterogeneous even upon binding to the SNARE complex (42), although fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies (24,43) argue that Syt1 adopts a fixed conformation upon binding to the SNARE complex, with the C2B domain of Syt1 playing a primary role in these interactions. Our analysis revealed that in the solution Ca2+-unbound form of Syt1 exists as an ensemble of conformers with tightly coupled domains.

    • Coupling exo- and endocytosis: An essential role for PIP <inf>2</inf> at the synapse

      2012, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids
      Citation Excerpt :

      These residues are thought to form a basic patch on C2B allowing pre-adsorption to PIP2 prior to the Ca2+ signal, thus producing an enhanced coupling of synaptotagmin to the release machinery [57,59,93,94]. However, this site has also been proposed to mediate interactions with the SNARE proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25 in a Ca2+-independent manner [95,96], and also to the full SNARE complex (although this interaction seems dependent on Ca2+) [97–99]. It should also be noted that the C2A domain has been reported to bind to SNAP-25 within the SNARE complex in a Ca2+-dependent manner, but with low affinity [100].

    • GPCR mediated regulation of synaptic transmission

      2012, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, NMR data demonstrated a primary interaction interface with SNARE may be through a polybasic region on the C2B domain (Dai et al., 2007). Most recently, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy data reveal a structurally heterogeneous interaction maintaining the polybasic and C2B domain interactions, but also a site near loop 2 of the calcium binding site in C2A; an interaction not seen in the other two studies mentioned (Lai et al., 2011). These authors suggest that this new binding mode allows for simultaneous interaction with the SNARE complex as well as two membrane surfaces in apposition such as the cell membrane and the docked synaptic vesicle.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A.L.L., H.H., and D.Z.H. contributed equally to this work.

    View full text