Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 42, Issue 4, 11 March 2009, Pages 418-423
Journal of Biomechanics

A stochastic biomechanical model for risk and risk factors of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.12.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Gender has been identified as a risk factor for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although some possible biomechanical risk factors underlying the gender differences in the risk for non-contact ACL injuries have been identified, they have not been quantitatively confirmed yet because of the descriptive nature of the traditional epidemiological methods. The purpose of this study was to validate a stochastic biomechanical model for the risk and risk factors for non-contact ACL injuries. An ACL loading model was developed and instrumented to a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the ACL injury rate for a stop–jump task in which non-contact ACL injuries frequently occur. Density distributions of independent variables of the ACL loading model were determined from in-vivo data of 40 male and 40 female athletes when performing the stop–jump task. A non-contact ACL injury was defined as the peak ACL loading being greater than 2250 N for males and 1800 N for females. The female-to-male non-contact ACL injury rate ratio was determined as the ratio of the probability of ACL ruptures of females to that of males. The female-to-male non-contact ACL injury rate ratio predicted by the stochastic biomechanical model was 4.96 (SD=0.22). The predicted knee flexion angle at the peak ACL loading in the simulated injury trials was 22.0 (SD=8.0) degrees for males and 24.9 (SD=5.6) degrees for females. The stochastic biomechanical model for non-contact ACL injuries developed in the present study accurately predicted the female-to-male injury rate ratio for non-contact ACL injuries and one of the kinematic characteristics of the injury.

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common knee injuries in sports (Griffin et al., 2006). The majority of ACL injuries occur with a non-contact mechanism (Boden et al., 2000) and can be potentially prevented (Griffin et al., 2006). Significant research efforts have been made in the last decade to determine modifiable risk factors of sustaining non-contact ACL injuries so prevention strategies can be developed. Although previous studies have indicated that biomechanical factors such as increased knee valgus moment, quadriceps muscle activation, and proximal anterior tibia shear force may be risk factors for non-contact ACL injuries (Malinzak et al., 2001; Chappell et al., 2002; Ford et al., 2003; Sell et al., 2007), a recent extensive literature review (Yu and Garrett, 2007) failed to find any convincing scientific evidence to support a cause-and-effect relationship between those proposed risk factors and non-contact ACL injuries.

The lack of scientific confirmation of biomechanical risk factors for non-contact ACL injuries is mainly due to a lack of effective and efficient research methods for identifying risk factors. The longitudinal cohort research design is the most commonly used traditional epidemiological method for identifying risk factors for an injury or disease. The studies using the longitudinal cohort design are usually complicated, labor intensive, time consuming, and expensive because of the need to test and follow a large group of subjects for a long time period to obtain a certain number of injury cases (Portney and Watkins, 2000). In addition, the results of the studies using the traditional cohort design are descriptive and lack cause-and-effect relationships between risk factors and the risk of an injury or disease (Portney and Watkins, 2000).

Stochastic biomechanical modeling is an effective and efficient research method for investigating the random outcomes of human movement (Hughes and An, 1997). This method allows investigators to determine the risk for an injury without following subjects to obtain actual injury cases. This enables the execution of the study to be less complicated, less labor intensive, less time consuming, and less expensive in comparison to traditional epidemiological methods. Also, stochastic biomechanical modeling method allows investigators to identify risk factors with cause-and-effect relationships to the injury in the absence of any observed injuries.

Stochastic biomechanical modeling method has been successfully applied to studies on the variation of human movements and prevention of a variety of musculoskeletal system injuries (Davidson et al., 2004; Langenderfer et al., 2006; McLean et al., 2004; Mirka and Marras, 1993; Santos and Valero-Cuevas, 2004; Valero-Cuevas et al., 2003). Stochastic biomechanical modeling methods have also been applied to recent research pertaining to ACL injury prevention. McLean et al. (2004) estimated the variation of ACL loading in a sidestep cut task using a stochastic biomechanical model. Garrett and Yu (2004) also examined the effects of proximal tibia anterior shear force and knee valgus–varus and internal–external rotation moments on ACL loading using a stochastic biomechanical modeling approach.

The purpose of this study was to validate a stochastic biomechanical model to predict the risk (injury rate or probability for injury) and risk factors (factors that contribute to the risk) for non-contact ACL injuries. We hypothesized that the female-to-male non-contact ACL injury rate ratio estimated using the stochastic biomechanical model proposed in this study would be similar to that determined using traditional epidemiological methods. We also hypothesized that the injury characteristics estimated by the Monte Carlo simulation using the stochastic biomechanical model proposed in this study would be similar to those reported in the literature.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A total of 40 male and 40 female recreational athletes without known history of lower extremity disorders were recruited as the subjects for this study (Table 1). A recreational athlete was defined as a person who played basketball, soccer, volleyball, and lacrosse at least 3 times per week for a total of at least 6 h per week without following a professionally designed training program. The use of human subjects was approved by the Biomedical Internal Review Board of the University.

Each subject

Results

The density distributions of the knee valgus–varus and internal–external rotation moments, tibia tilt angle, and COP to ankle distance at the time of posterior ground reaction force were distributed as a Normal distribution for both genders (Table 3, Table 4). The density distributions of the peak posterior ground reaction force, and hamstring and gastrocnemius muscle forces at the time of posterior ground reaction force were distributed as Gamma distributions for both genders (Table 3, Table 4

Discussion

The results of this study support the validity of the stochastic biomechanical model for the peak ACL loading. The stop–jump task was chosen as a testing task to predict ACL injury rate in this study. This task was frequently performed in basketball games and training, and has been identified as a task in which ACL injuries frequently occur. The estimated female-to-male non-contact ACL injury rate ratio was 4.96 (SD=0.22), similar to 4.59 (SD=0.64), the mean female-to-male non-contact ACL

Conflict of interest statement

None

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted at the Motion Analysis Laboratory of the Center for Human Movement Science in the Division of Physical Therapy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

References (44)

  • B. Yu et al.

    Lower extremity biomechanics during the landing of a stop–jump task

    Clin. Biomech.

    (2006)
  • J. Agel et al.

    Anterior cruciate ligament injury in national collegiate athletic association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (2005)
  • B.P. Boden et al.

    Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury

    Orthopedics

    (2000)
  • J.D. Chappell et al.

    A comparison of knee kinetics between male and female recreational athletes in stop-jump tasks

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (2002)
  • J.D. Chappell et al.

    Kinematics and EMG of landing preparation in vertical stop-jump: risk for non-contact ACL injury

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (2007)
  • M.I. Danto et al.

    The mechanical properties of skeletally mature rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon over a range of strain rates

    J. Orthop. Res.

    (1993)
  • P.L. Davidson et al.

    Stochastic-rheological simulation of free-fall arm impact in children: application to playground injuries

    Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.

    (2004)
  • L. Durselen et al.

    The influence of muscle forces and external loads on cruciate ligament strain

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (1995)
  • M. Evans et al.

    Statistical Distributions

    (2000)
  • K.R. Ford et al.

    Valgus knee motion during landing in high school female and male basketball players

    Med. Sci. Sports Exercise

    (2003)
  • Garrett, W.E., Yu, B., 2004. Gender differences in lower extremity kinetics and probability for non-contact ACL...
  • D.G. Gerleman et al.

    Instrumentation

  • Cited by (58)

    • The effect of performance demands on lower extremity biomechanics during landing and cutting tasks

      2019, Journal of Sport and Health Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previously investigators have focused on the effect of drop height on lower extremity biomechanics during drop-vertical jump tasks.27,28 Jump-landing task have been usually completed with participants jumping for maximum jump height.10,19–21,29,30 The results of the current study, however, suggest that jumping for 60% of maximum height may represent a scenario that is associated with increased ACL loading compared with jumping for maximum height, because of the decreased knee flexion angle.8

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text