Elsevier

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Volume 116, Issue 11, November 2016, Pages 1738, 1741-1744, 1745-1746
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Practice Applications
Topics of Professional Interest
Clinical Ethics and Nutrition Support Practice: Implications for Practice Change and Curriculum Development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.01.009Get rights and content

Section snippets

Development of Action Statements and Practice Application

A literature review of the past 5 years identified actions that clinicians and hospitals could use to optimize clinical ethics in nutrition support care.2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 Ten action statements were selected from a list of actions by 22 members of the International Clinical Ethics Section of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) (Figure 1). These

Clinical Ethics Priorities

The common priorities of the action statements reflect a desire to communicate early with individuals/family/surrogates in order to learn their wishes for life-sustaining therapies and obtain advance directives; and incorporate evidence-based medicine addressing potential benefits vs risk/burdens of therapies, along with a proactive consistent health care team approach. Many health care organizations do not yet have reliable systems to engage effectively with individuals to understand their

Transdisciplinary Function

RDN involvement in clinical ethics is supported by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics with position and practice papers and an ethics action paper,27, 35, 40 along with an ethics requirement for recertification each 5-year cycle. Clinical ethics requires an interdisciplinary (physicians, RDNs, nurses, pharmacists, speech language pathologists, social workers, chaplains, and other professionals, as appropriate) process and acceptance of discipline interaction to achieve a consistent team

Evidence-Based Evaluation of Benefits and Risk/Burdens of Nutrition Support

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and A.S.P.E.N. have created evidence-based guidelines that evaluate the potential benefits vs risk/burdens of therapeutic nutrition support in a myriad of clinical situations.5, 9, 27, 35 For individuals receiving active therapy for underlying disease and associated physiologic derangements, these guidelines offer guidance for when and how to use nutrition support. Application of clinical ethics is quite straightforward: nutrition support should be

Recommendations for Nutrition Curriculum Design

Different approaches to engage, empower, and educate nutrition support clinicians in clinical ethics might be needed for students in the various disciplines. It is important that students develop an understanding of the four main bioethics principles (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice), along with cultivating their own moral reasoning skills and communication skills with patients and other disciplines.42 Undergraduate education represents the first opportunity to expose health

Integration of Palliative Care Training into Health Care Clinicians Curriculum

Understanding of palliative care principles and application in the clinical process is critical to improve the ethical practice of initiating, withholding, or withdrawing of nutrition support. With increasing professional and public awareness of the need for humanistic care at the end of life, palliative care has emerged as a priority in medical education.49 Palliative care should not be considered only for an end-of-life focus, but a broader process involving quality of life discussions in

Ranking of Action Statements

Initial application of the recommendations indicated in this article may be limited due to restriction on clinician’s care time and institution financial restrictions. A survey was developed and distributed to rank the action statements and provide an indication of the relative importance for implementation. The results were collected (Figure 2). Additional action statements used in the survey were developed from the work of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) in their Conversation

Ranking Variation of Action Statements

Clinicians caring for adult, pediatric, and neonatal individuals had different rankings for clinician ethics action statements. Pediatric and neonatal practitioners ranked “incorporate evidence-based medicine on benefits vs risk/burdens of nutrition support and include ethical decision making into clinical practice” highest. Conversely, adult practitioners ranked “prevent ethical dilemmas with early communication with patient, family, and/or surrogate decision maker about patient wishes for

Recommendations

It is important that clinicians collectively, from all disciplines, focus their efforts on the establishment of clinicians’ actions and institution processes that incorporate the identified actions presented in this article. Prioritizing the implementation of these actions can vary, depending on the specific population and country. The action statements will help address future education programs, materials, and articles in nutrition journals, along with curriculum guidance on the topic of

Acknowledgements

The following participated in the developed and concepts in the manuscript: Deborah Abel, PhD, RD; McCutcheon Adams, LICSW; David A. August, MD; Albert Barrocas, MD, FACS, FASPEN; Carol McGinnis, DNP, CNS-APRN, CNSC; Kelly Alessandro Pontes-Arruda, MD, MSc, PhD, FCCM; and Elizabeth Reis, PhD.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (55)

  • C. Zimmermann et al.

    Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • T.E. Roberts et al.

    Coalition: The way forward for medical education

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • S. Devries et al.

    A deficiency of nutrition education in medical training

    Am J Med

    (2014)
  • D.B. Schwartz

    Ethical considerations in the critically ill patient

  • C.M.A. Geppert et al.

    Ethics and law

  • J.M. Teno et al.

    Change in end-of-life care for beneficiaries

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • D.B. Schwartz et al.

    A.S.P.E.N. Special report: Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life

    Nutr Clinc Pract

    (2014)
  • Institute of Medicine. Dying in America Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life, Key...
  • American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging Myths and Facts About Health Care Advance Directives....
  • American Dietetic Association/Commission on Dietetic Registration Code of Ethics for the Profession of Dietetics and process for consideration of ethical issues

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2009)
  • A. Barrocas et al.

    A.S.P.E.N. Ethics position paper

    Nutr Clin Pract

    (2010)
  • M.J. Barry et al.

    Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • Committee on Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and religious directives for...
  • Conversation Ready Health Care Community. Institute for Healthcare Improvement....
  • D.S. Diekema et al.

    Forgoing medically provided nutrition and hydration in children

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • E.G. Epstein

    Preventive ethics in the intensive care unit

    Am Assoc Crit Care Nurs

    (2012)
  • J. Erickson

    Bedside nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making

    Dimens Crit Care Nurs

    (2013)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Revised 2021 Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Nutrition Support

      2021, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      RDNs must have the knowledge, skill, and experience in the application of principles and guidelines in delivering nutrition support, along with general knowledge of all potential comorbidities of a patient/client, in order to appropriately address and provide quality nutrition care and services or know when to confer with or refer to another provider. Since patients/clients requiring nutrition support therapy present with varied and complex treatment issues, the RDN must consider the ethical implications36-38 of nutrition and hydration,39,40 particularly in certain populations, such as those with dementia41 or receiving palliative42 or end-of-life care. Care decisions need to reflect the wishes of the patient/client and/or family/surrogate decision-maker, consistent with an advanced directive that may be in place.

    • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered

      2018, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      NDTRs support members of the interprofessional health care team that provides palliative and/or end-of-life care to adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients/clients. The physician, RDN, or registered nurse is ultimately responsible for communicating to the patient/client, family, guardians, and advocates the risks/burdens of nutrition intervention options and maintaining clinical ethics awareness involving life-sustaining therapies, such as nutrition interventions.45-47 NDTRs:

    • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Scope of Practice for the Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

      2018, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Are responsible for clinical ethics awareness involving life-sustaining therapies including nutrition interventions, reflecting evidence-based guidelines that evaluate the potential benefits and risks/burdens of therapeutic nutrition support (enteral and intravenous nutrition) in myriad of clinical situations.67,68 Communicate with the patient/client, family, guardians, and/or advocate15 regarding benefits and risks/burdens of nutrition intervention options.67-70 RDNs are leaders in evidence-based nutrition practices that address wellness and disease prevention at all stages of life.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article was written by Denise B. Schwartz, MS, RD, CNSC, FADA, FAND, FASPEN, a nutrition support coordinator, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, CA; Nader Armanios, MS, RD, a clinical dietitian, Food and Nutrition Services, Olive View−University of California, Los Angeles, Sylmar; Cheryl Monturo, PhD, MBE, an acute care nurse practitioner—board certified, and an assistant chair and associate professor of nursing and John A. Hartford Claire M. Fagin Fellow, College of Health Sciences, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester; Eric H. Frankel, MSE, PharmD, a board certified nutrition support pharmacist and a clinical pharmacy consultant, West Texas Clinical Pharmacy Associates, Inc, Kansas City, MO, and Lubbock, TX; John R. Wesley, MD, FACS, FAAP, FASPEN, an adjunct professor of Surgery, University of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL; Mayur Patel, MD, chairman, Department of Medicine and ICU committee, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, CA; Babak Goldman, MD, palliative care director, Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Burbank, CA; Gustavo Kliger, MD, chief, Clinical Nutrition Service and Nutrition Support Unit, Austral University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Emily Schwartz, MS, RD, CNSC, a clinical dietitian, Providence Park Hospital, Novi, MI, and a doctoral student, Clinical Nutrition Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark.

    STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

    FUNDING/SUPPORT There is no funding to disclose.

    View full text