Original articleLeadershipOptimizing Communication With Parents on Benefits and Radiation Risks in Pediatric Imaging
Introduction
Despite improvements in protocol optimization and scanner technology to reduce exposure to children, there remains public concern about iatrogenic effects of radiation exposure. If patients or their parents are fearful of radiation exposure and have concerns reinforced by inaccurate information, there is risk for compromised patient care as access or image quality is diminished through efforts to reduce radiation dose 1, 2, 3, 4. Worse, patients may refuse appropriate diagnostic imaging tests, leading to suboptimal quality of care 3, 5.
Effective communication of benefits and risks from diagnostic imaging of adult and pediatric patients alike remains a serious concern 6, 7. Without effective dialogue between patients or their guardians and imaging professionals, patient dissatisfaction (at best) or medical errors (at worst) can ensue, leading to potential consequences as severe as litigation 8, 9 and negative publicity for the facility and providers involved 10, 11. According to a recent survey [6], patients routinely receive very little information about the pros and cons of diagnostic scans: only 21% of patients had discussed the benefits and risks of their most recent imaging studies with physicians [12].
In this article we build on previous foundations 13, 14 that enumerate several traits of effective risk communication aimed at optimizing the outcomes of communication between medical imaging providers and patients, expanding on these notions by presenting 12 strategies to facilitate this. For the purpose of this discussion, we use the linear no-threshold model as a conservative basis for radiation protection, with the provision that in the range of dose of a single typical CT scan, the radiation risk for an individual can be estimated only with large uncertainty in part because of individual differences in the efficacy of repair mechanisms of radiogenic genetic damage.
Section snippets
Addressing the Clinical Appropriateness of the Examination
Radiologists frequently encounter examination orders with vague or prepopulated but uninformative clinical indications, many of which likely contribute to overutilization of imaging 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. A substantial number of CT scans are ordered to reduce the medicolegal malpractice risk of the ordering physician (defensive medicine) 20, 21. In some instances, parents may insist on their children undergoing scans that are not clinically indicated and/or are expected to add little value to the
Take-Home Points
- ■
Pediatric imaging professionals and providers continue to sometimes face negative public perceptions of medical imaging radiation risks that are often disproportionate to the medical benefits.
- ■
Simplifying the concept of risk and enhancing efficient dialogue with the parents or guardians of a patient can help establish open, effective, and trusting communication, which if conveyed properly should help subside potential apprehension or unwillingness to undergo the needed radiologic diagnostic test.
References (88)
The CT dose and utilization controversy: the radiologist’s response
J Am Coll Radiol
(2008)Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans
Ann ICRP
(2012)- et al.
Chest fast MRI: an imaging alternative on pre-operative evaluation of Pectus Excavatum
J Pediatr Surg
(2012) - et al.
Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada
Ann Emerg Med
(2013) - et al.
Content and style of radiation risk communication for pediatric patients
J Am Coll Radiol
(2014) - et al.
The Image Gently Think A-Head Campaign: keep calm and Image Gently
J Am Coll Radiol
(2017) - et al.
Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2012) - et al.
Patients as partners in radiology education: an innovative approach to teaching and assessing patient-centered communication
Acad Radiol
(2008) - et al.
Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon
J Pediatr Surg
(2007) We can do better than effective dose for estimating or comparing low-dose radiation risks
Ann ICRP
(2012)
Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans
Mayo Clin Proc
Image Gently: a campaign to reduce children’s and adolescents’ risk for cancer during adulthood
J Adolesc Health
Shared decision-making: is it time to obtain informed consent before radiologic examinations utilizing ionizing radiation? Legal and ethical implications
J Am Coll Radiol
Understanding the problem of a parent’s fear of their child getting cancer from CT scan radiation
J Pediatr Surg
Radiation is not the only risk
AJR Am J Roentgenol
The neglected side of the coin: quantitative benefit-risk analyses in medical imaging
Health Phys
Subjecting radiologic imaging to the linear no-threshold hypothesis: a non sequitur of non-trivial proportion
J Nucl Med
To scan or not to scan: consideration of medical benefit in the justification of CT scanning
Health Phys
CT radiation dose reduction: can we do harm by doing good?
Pediatr Radiol
Patient knowledge and understanding of radiation from diagnostic imaging
JAMA Intern Med
Why patients sue their radiologists
ACR Bull
Radiation overdoses point up dangers of CT scans
The New York Times
American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Radiology. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography
Pediatrics
Risk communication: principles, strategies, tools, and applications
Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Seven cardinal rules of risk communication
Addressing overutilization in medical imaging
Radiology
Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge
Radiology
Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging
Acad Emerg Med
Factitious disease: clinical lessons from case studies at Baylor University Medical Center
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)
The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine. Part 2: benefits versus risk of CT
Pediatr Radiol
Incidental findings in children with blunt head trauma evaluated with cranial CT scans
Pediatrics
Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department 2000-2006
Emerg Radiol
Thinking fast and slow
CT scans: balancing health risks and medical benefits
Environ Health Perspect
Science and perception of radiation risk
Radiographics
Personal and public perceptions of radiation risks
Radiographics
Cited by (0)
The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the material discussed in this article.