Clinical Investigation
MRI-Based Evaluation of the Vaginal Cuff in Brachytherapy Planning: Are We Missing the Target?

This work was presented previously in part at the American Brachytherapy Society Annual Meeting, April 10, 2015, Orlando, FL.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.042Get rights and content

Purpose

Although recurrences and toxicity occur after vaginal cuff (VC) brachytherapy, little is known about dosimetry due to the inability to clearly visualize the VC on computed tomography (CT). T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in this setting, and we hypothesized that it could provide previously unascertainable dosimetric information.

Methods and Materials

In a cohort of 32 patients who underwent cylinder-based brachytherapy for endometrial cancer with available MR simulation images, the VC was retrospectively contoured on T2W images, and cases were replanned to treat the upper VC to a dose of 7 Gy/fraction prescribed to 5 mm. Relevant dose-volume parameters for the VC were calculated.

Results

T2W MRI identified significant underdosing not observed on CT or T1-weighted imaging. Over two-thirds (69%) of patients had at least 1 cm3 of VC that received less than 75% of the prescription dose and half (50%) of patients had a least 1 cm3 of VC that received less than 50% of the prescription dose. The mean minimum point dose to the VC was 2.4 Gy, or 34% of the intended prescription dose (range: 0.53-6.4 Gy).

Conclusions

We identified previously unreported VC underdosing in over two-thirds of our patients, with most of these patients having volumes of undistended VC that received less than half of the prescription dose. The maximum dimension was along the craniocaudal axis in some patients or left-right/anterior-posterior axis in others, suggesting that suture material may be restricting access to the vaginal apex and that alternative applicators may be needed when the diameter of the apex is larger than the introitus. Additional follow-up will be needed to determine whether underdosing is associated with isolated VC failure or whether low failure rates across the cohort suggest that some patients are being exposed to excessive dose and unnecessary risk of toxicity.

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with 54,870 new cases estimated in 2015 (1). After surgical management, 70% of failures occur in the vaginal cuff (VC) (2). Although external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) decreases risk of these failures 2, 3, brachytherapy alone achieves similar VC control in appropriately selected patients with less gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity 4, 5, 6.

Unique dosimetric challenges exist in brachytherapy for endometrial cancer given that the VC is both the clinical target volume (CTV) and an organ at risk. Although trials of vaginal brachytherapy required a uniform dose and prescription depth, the dose distribution to the VC CTV has historically been impossible to calculate because computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopic imaging was used, neither of which allows for adequate delineation of the VC from surrounding tissue (7). Because VC failures are uncommon after brachytherapy 4, 8, 9, it is assumed that the at-risk tissue is being sufficiently covered. However, insufficient coverage might be the cause of failures that do occur, and this can only be investigated using imaging modalities that allow for direct visualization of the VC. Furthermore, inability to directly visualize the vaginal cuff suggests a missed opportunity to minimize toxicity by delivering only the minimum dose necessary to achieve an acceptable rate of VC control.

VC can be visualized using T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 10, 11, which provides better soft tissue contrast than CT (12) and is already used in other gynecologic cancers for defining gross disease 13, 14. This supports a novel application in endometrial cancer treatment. We hypothesize that there is significant post-operative anatomic variation in VC anatomy, and that T2W MRI can be used to provide a full and nuanced quantification of VC dosimetry.

Section snippets

Methods and Materials

The records of 42 patients treated with postoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using vaginal cylinders at the University of Michigan from August 2013 to January 2015 were reviewed with institutional review board approval. Surgery consisted of total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Eligible patients underwent vaginal cylinder–based brachytherapy with or without EBRT and had at least 1 simulation MRI. Ten patients who underwent CT-based

Qualitative assessment of VC

On T2W images, structures had the following appearances: vaginal cylinder-black/hypointense, lubricant, and fluid in vaginal canal-white/hyperintense, and VC-intermediate signal, hyperintense to cylinder but hypointense compared with surrounding pelvic fat. Like other muscular structures in the pelvis, the cuff had a typical striated or multilayered morphology. Normal structures were easily identified, including the bladder, urethra/Foley catheter, and rectosigmoid. Areas of undistended vaginal

Discussion

This study used emerging MRI simulation techniques to evaluate VC dosimetry in adjuvant brachytherapy for endometrial cancer. Our study has several novel findings. First, many patients had large areas of VC that were underdosed. Two-thirds of patients had at least 1 cm3 of VC that received less than 75% of the prescription dose, and half of patients had at least 1 cm3 of VC that received less than 50% of the prescription dose.

Second, there was significant heterogeneity with respect to VC

Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified frequent and substantial VC underdosing using MRI simulation and retrospective dosimetry in women undergoing cylinder-based HDR brachytherapy after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. The clinical implications of these findings necessitate further investigation, including associations with failure rates and toxicity. We suggest that ongoing and future prospective studies of vaginal cylinder–based brachytherapy should consider MR-based VC dosimetry to firmly

References (24)

Cited by (21)

  • Do air gaps with image-guided vaginal cuff brachytherapy impact failure rates in patients with high-intermediate risk FIGO Stage I endometrial cancer?

    2021, Brachytherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Because the submucosal lymphatic channels that are the target of VCBT lie in a relatively narrow window a few millimeters deep to the vaginal mucosa and dose distribution in modern optimization algorithms is driven primarily by distance from the source, the question has been raised as to whether these air gaps are detrimental to target coverage (5,6). Multiple studies have been performed to quantify air gaps and their dosimetric impact, finding a mean dose reduction to the vaginal mucosa of 26–27% (7–18). However, none have assessed the impact of these air gaps on the rate of VCF after IGBT.

  • Brachytherapy Future Directions

    2020, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In gynecological cancer, several applicators are ubiquitous. However, poor applicator fit during vaginal brachytherapy can lead to air gaps and underdosing of the target volume.21 For interstitial implants, poor applicator fit or placement may result in poor implant geometry and increased interfraction variability when multiple fractions are delivered with a single implant.22

  • Clinical Outcome of Exclusively Radiographer-led Delivery of Postoperative Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy for Endometrial Cancer – The Addenbrooke's Experience

    2019, Clinical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    More recently, MRI-guided VBT has been adopted by some centres in view of the superior soft tissue contrast compared with computed tomography. One study of MRI-guided VBT reported air gaps in 48% of patients, resulting in 75% of patients in this study receiving <50% dose to the vaginal cuff [16]. The solution for air gaps identified on imaging remains uncertain.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest: none.

View full text