Multi-tier sustainable supply chain management: The role of supply chain leadership

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) has been considered increasingly important by both industry and academia in recent years. Among the main streams of SSCM research, little is known on how multi-national corporations (MNCs), assuming leadership in their supply chain, have been able to facilitate their supply chain members to learn sustainability practice in an emerging economy context. To answer this research question, a multiple-case study was designed. Multi-tier supply chains of three MNCs were selected to investigate their proactive sustainability projects in China. A framework was proposed based on the constructs of supply chain leadership, multi-tier supply chain governance, multi-tier supply chain structure and supply chain learning. We found that the combined effect of supply chain leadership and governance mechanisms affects both supply chain structure and supply chain learning and MNCs change their supply chain structure to facilitate supply chain learning. Three sets of propositions are advanced and implications for future research are elucidated.

Introduction

Since the early 2000s, Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) has drawn much attention from both industry and academia alike. Organizations review their products and processes in order to deliver more environmental friendly products and services. A high number of papers have been published to follow the trend (Seuring, 2013). Of the SSCM research, existing literature is focused on building the definitions of SSCM - defining SSCM and building the related roadmaps and frameworks (Carter and Rogers, 2008, Seuring and Muller, 2008); some start looking at the implementation of SSCM (Lam, 2011, Walker and Jones, 2012); while others discuss the strategies of SSCM (Seuring and Muller, 2008, Harms et al., 2013). Most authors focus their discussion on the enablers and barriers for organizations implementing SSCM (Seuring and Muller, 2008, Walker et al., 2008, Gimenez and Tachizawa, 2012, Walker and Jones, 2012, Harms et al., 2013). Some focus the debate on SSCM governance mechanisms (Mamic, 2005, Gimenez and Tachizawa, 2012); others consider the decisions to pursue sustainability in a complex and uncertain environment (Pagell and Wu, 2009, Wu and Pagell, 2011).

In recent years, the research interest in SSCM has shifted from focusing on focal companies to Tier 1 suppliers (Wilhelm et al., 2016a, Wilhelm et al., 2016b) and multi-tier supply chains (Mena et al., 2013, Grimm et al., 2014, Tachizawa and Wong, 2014). However, among these studies, very few contributions (e.g. Defee et al., 2009a, Defee et al., 2009b, Defee et al., 2010, Gosling et al., 2016) focus on the role of supply chain leadership in the implementation of sustainable initiatives in a multi-tier SSCM context, although organization leadership is believed to be vital to win competitive advantage. Biotto et al. (2012) provide a single case study of Illycaffe Group, focusing on quality oriented supply chain learning where Illycaffe played a supply chain coordinator role (and a leader role) in order to efficiently and effectively manage quality along the whole supply chain. They conclude that the coordination of supply chain learning needs substantial effort and resource commitment from the leader organization (Biotto et al. (2012)).

We study the MNCs' SSCM practices in China because China is the ‘factory of the world’ (Harney, 2008) and is still one of the most rapidly developing centres of production in the world (Biggermann and Fam, 2011). On the other hand, China has also been the ‘largest carbon emission country’ and ‘largest energy consumer country’ (Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012). Since academic and anecdotal evidence show that MNCs are leaders of their supply chains in China, many Chinese suppliers and customers are attempting to learn sustainability initiatives of MNCs. Thus, to address the gaps in the literature (lack of answer to how to implement and lack of research on SSCM in multi-tier supply chains), we attempt to explore the below research question:

“What role does MNC's supply chain leadership play in learning of sustainability in multi-tier supply chains?”

We attempt to draw insights from emerging areas of research in SCM, namely: multi-tier SSCM, supply chain leadership; and supply chain learning for the investigation of the topic. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous research studying SSCM through the lenses of supply chain leadership and supply chain learning in a multi-tier supply chain context (Gosling et al., 2016).

This research contributes to the SSCM literature in the following ways: first, it may be the first empirical attempt that applies both supply chain learning and leadership lenses to investigate SSCM and to answer the research question of how to implement sustainable initiatives. This helps to explain how MNCs implement sustainable initiatives in China; second, this research enriches our understanding of the role of organizational leadership in MNCs' SSCM, in particular the role of supply chain leadership in the leaning of sustainability; third, the research contributes to the multi-tier supply chain management research through adopting new lenses of supply chain leadership and supply chain learning.

After this introduction, section 2 provides a literature review on the research that has been undertaken on the key concepts; section 3 presents the case study research method; sections 4 and 5 present the within and cross case analysis of the three cases regarding the similarities and differences and identifying patterns; section 6 discusses the case findings against the reviewed literature and develops a number of propositions; Finally, section 7 summarizes theoretical and practical contributions, acknowledges limitations of the research and indicates potential research directions.

Section snippets

Literature review

In this section, we review the concepts of SSCM in multi-tier supply chains, supply chain leadership and leadership's role in supply chain learning respectively.

Research methodology

In order to answer the research question, a multiple case study research method was applied. “A case study is an empirical enquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real life context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident” (Yin, 2008, p.13). Given the fact that limited research has been done on SSCM adopting supply chain leadership and supply chain learning in a multi-tier SSCM context, it is, therefore, appropriate to explore

Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak is the world's leading food packaging company. Tetra Pak realizes the importance of conducting business in a sustainable manner and taking full social and environmental responsibilities. One of its sustainability initiatives is to create a recycling chain in China. In 1998, Tetra Pak China set up its Environmental Department to look into the recycling issue of used beverage cartons (UBC). After investing over 150 million RMB (21.7 million USD) over ten years, Tetra Pak China's

Cross case analysis

All the three MNCs can be considered more sustainable than their peers in the three initiatives. This section presents the cross case analysis of the three cases. The similarities and differences are discussed along with four constructs: multi-tier SSCM in terms of supply chain governance mechanisms (Section 5.1), supply chain leadership (Section 5.2), supply chain structure (Section 5.3) and supply chain learning (Section 5.4).

Discussion

This section presents discussions based on the cross case analysis and compares findings with the literature reviews. In order to answer the research question (What role does MNC's supply chain leadership play in learning of sustainability in multi-tier supply chains?) and based on the within and cross-case analyses, a framework is proposed in Fig. 3, which makes a summary of all the constructs of supply chain leadership, multi-tier supply chain governance mechanism, multi-tier supply chain

Conclusion

Our research significantly enriches the research stream of SSCM in multi-tier supply chains, and examines the phenomenon through three cases: Tetra Pak creating a recycling chain in China (five tiers), Nestlé modernizing China's dairy industry (three tiers) and IKEA's sustainable cotton initiative (seven tiers). Going beyond the traditional focus on implementing supplier's code of conduct, this research has examined three proactive multi-tier SSCM initiatives and explore the role of supply

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the financial support from the Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Sciences project (Grant number: 17YJA630034) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. 2017J01519).

References (55)

  • I. Stuart et al.

    Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2002)
  • S. Vachon et al.

    Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2008)
  • H. Walker et al.

    Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2008)
  • M.M. Wilhelm et al.

    Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2016)
  • M. Wilhelm et al.

    Implementing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: strategies and contingencies in managing sub-suppliers

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • Z. Wu et al.

    Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2011)
  • B.J. Avolio et al.

    Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire

    J. Occup. Organ. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • B.M. Bass

    Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations

    (1985)
  • B.M. Bass et al.

    Transformational leadership: a response to critiques

  • B.M. Bass

    Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership

    Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • J. Bessant et al.

    Putting supply chain learning into practice

    Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.

    (2003)
  • S. Biggermann et al.

    Business marketing in BRIC countries

    Ind. Market. Manag.

    (2011)
  • M. Biotto et al.

    Knowledge and cultural diffusion along the supply chain as drivers of product quality improvement: the Illycaffè case study

    Int. J. Logist. Manag.

    (2012)
  • C.R. Carter et al.

    A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory

    Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag.

    (2008)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences

    China Sustainable Development Report 2012-China’s Sustainable Development in the Shifting Global Context

    (2012)
  • M.C. Cooper et al.

    Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics

    Int. J. Logist. Manag.

    (1997)
  • A. Cox

    Understanding buyer and supplier power: a framework for procurement and supply competence

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (103)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text