Influence of catalysts on hydrogen production from wastewater generated from the HTL of human feces via catalytic hydrothermal gasification
Introduction
Due to a lack of access to proper sanitation facilities, nearly 15% of the world's population currently defecates in the open [11]. Open defecation not only causes aquatic dead zones, but also leads to severe health risks resulting in significant financial burdens. In particular, throughout Southeast Asia, 13 million tons of human fecal matter are released into groundwater sources ever year, which incurs an economic burden of greater than $2 billion per year [14]. Therefore, properly handling fecal matter has become a pressing issue from a sanitation, environmental, and economic standpoint.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermochemical process that operates at elevated temperatures (∼260–350 °C) and pressures (∼10–20 MPa) in order to convert wet organic feedstocks into liquefied biocrude oil. HTL is a promising thermochemical technology because it requires a low total solid content (10–25%), and its by-products can be controlled by an alteration of the experimental parameters [30]. Previously, swine manure has been utilized as a feedstock for HTL purposes. Higher heating values (HHV) of biocrude oil have been reported of up to 38.8 MJ/kg with a biocrude oil yield of 39% [7]. Since human feces have a similar chemical composition to that of swine manure, it also has the potential to be a promising HTL feedstock [23]. However, one of the main drawbacks of the HTL process is that it produces a wastewater known as post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW). This human feces PHWW (HF-PHWW) contains a large amount of organic compounds, including organic acids (acetic acid, pentanoic acid, etc.), nitrogenous compounds (2-piperidone, 2-6-dimethyl-3-pyridinol, etc.), and phenol derivatives (3-dimethylamino-phenol, etc.) [27]. The large content of nitrogenous compounds and ammonia present in the wastewater limits the self-sustaining nature of the HTL process. Therefore, finding ways to treat and utilize HF-PHWW is essential to minimize the environmental and economic impacts for the thermochemical conversion of human feces via HTL.
Catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) has been proposed as one way to treat high moisture content feedstocks, which is believed to be a promising process for fuel gas and hydrogen production [9]. The process of gasification involves the incorporation of catalysts with high reaction temperatures in order to chemically reform the bonds in organic feedstocks into basic gaseous constituents, including H2, CH4, CO2, and CO [33]. CHG utilizes water as the reaction medium, which allows this process to bypass the energetically costly step that involves drying the organic feedstock [28]. CHG can also selectively produce syngas (H2 and CO) in high concentrations, and the byproducts of this form of gasification are environmentally benign. The benefit of CHG over traditional gas and liquid thermochemical conversion technologies is that it has an elevated reaction rate and enhanced heat transfer properties due to the use of water as the reaction medium [18], [21], [24], [37]. Therefore, CHG shows potential as a method to treat the organic matter present in the PHWW in order to enhance the prospect of HTL and produce value-added gasses.
Due to the high moisture content and large organic matter content of HF-PHWW, it serves as an ideal gasification feedstock. Currently, much of the work in the field of supercritical water gasification includes the incorporation of model compounds, such as glucose [6], fructose [25], and mixtures of model compounds [15]. Although previous studies have focused on the CHG of wastewater from feedstocks such as algae [10], poly-vinyl alcohol [34], and the amino-acid production process [19], no studies have focused on the wastewater generated from the HTL of human feces. Further, no previous studies have focused on concomitantly analyzing CHG from the perspectives of energy recovery, H2 production, and organic matter reduction (CODr).
The objectives of this study are: (1) to investigate the use of gasification catalysts using low reaction conditions on a previously unutilized wastewater feedstock for the maximization of H2 content and liquid effluent quality; (2) to study the impact of the mixing ratio of two combined catalysts on the gas and liquid characteristics; (3) to optimize the reaction conditions for the maximization of the H2 content, CODr, and energy recovery.
Section snippets
Feedstock characterization
Human feces samples were collected by volunteers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. All samples were combined, mixed, and stored in an airtight receptacle in a 4 °C fridge. The moisture content of the human feces feedstock was determined as the solid residue remaining at 105 °C after 24 h. The elemental composition of human feces was determined using a CE 440 Element Analyzer (Exeter Analytical, Inc., North Chelmsford, MA), and the chemical composition was analyzed per the
Influence of catalysts on CHG liquid and gas effluent quality
Fig. 1 displays the gas and liquid characteristics resulting from the catalyst screening gasification study conducted at 400 °C, a 60-min retention time (RT), an initial pressure of 30 bar, and a catalyst/feedstock (C/F) ratio of 0.1. From the data presented in Fig. 1, NaOH produced the highest H2 content (46.9%) and one of the lowest CO2 contents (49.7%). This is due to the role of homogenous catalysts in promoting the adsorption of CO2 to produce carbonate salts and water which enhance the
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that a mixture of Raney Ni and Ru/AC could produce more H2 than either catalyst individually, indicating catalyst synergy may exist between these two catalysts. A Ni:Ru ratio of 0.9 at 400 °C and a 30-min retention time lead to a maximum H2 composition of 56.3%, compared to 41.2% using pure Raney Ni. Similarly, increasing the Raney Ni content lead to enhanced gas characteristics. At a Ni:Ru ratio of 0.9, the H2 yield, gas yield, and H2/organic matter content yielded
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors have read and have abided by the statement of ethical standards.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (RTTC-C-R2-01-001).
References (40)
- et al.
Review of heterogeneous catalysts for sub- and supercritical water gasification of biomass and wastes
Int J Hydrogen Energy
(2011) - et al.
Catalytic gasification of biomass model compound in near-critical water
Appl Catal A Gen
(2009) - et al.
Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of alkaline wheat straw pulping black liquor in continuous flow system
Int J Hydrogen Energy
(2011) - et al.
Experimental and fluid dynamic study of continuous supercritical water gasification of glucose
J Supercrit Fluids
(2016) - et al.
Co-liquefaction of swine manure and mixed-culture algal biomass from a wastewater treatment system to produce bio-crude oil
Appl Energy
(2014) - et al.
Hydrothermal liquefaction of mixed-culture algal biomass from wastewater treatment system into bio-crude oil
Bioresour Technol
(2014) - et al.
Hydrogen production by sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor
Int J Hydrogen Energy
(2013) - et al.
Hydrogen production from the catalytic supercritical water gasification of process water generated from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae
Fuel
(2016) - et al.
Influence of NaOH and Ni catalysts on hydrogen production from the supercritical water gasification of dewatered sewage sludge
Int J Hydrogen Energy
(2014) - et al.
Hydrogen production from lignin, cellulose and waste biomass via supercritical water gasification: catalyst activity and process optimization study
Energy Convers Manag
(2016)
Studies on kinetics of ammonia synthesis over ruthenium catalyst supported on active carbon
Appl Catal A General
Co-precipitated Ni-Mg-Al catalysts for hydrogen production by supercritical water gasification of glucose
Int J Hydrogen Energy
Catalytic supercritical water gasification of primary paper sludge using a homogeneous and heterogeneous catalyst: experimental vs thermodynamic equilibrium results
Bioresour Technol
Simultaneous production of biocrude oil and recovery of nutrients and metals from human feces via hydrothermal liquefaction
Energy Convers Manag
Biomass gasification in near- and super-critical water: status and prospects
Biomass Bioenergy
Supercritical water gasification of fructose as a model compound for waste fruits and vegetables
J Supercrit Fluids
Supercritical water gasification of biomass for hydrogen production
Int J Hydrogen Energy
Subcritical water gasification of beet-based distillery wastewater for hydrogen production
J Supercrit Fluids
Hydrothermal liquefaction for algal biorefinery: a critical review
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Direct gasification of dewatered sewage sludge in supercritical water. Part 1: effects of alkali salts
Int J Hydrogen Energy
Cited by (52)
Continuous wet air oxidation of aqueous phase from hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge
2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringHydrothermal liquefaction of municipal sludge and its products applications
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentIntegration of hydrothermal gasification with biorefinery processes for efficient production of biofuels and biochemicals
2024, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyHydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels, chemicals and materials: A review holistically connecting product properties and marketable applications
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentEfficient anaerobic digestion of hydrothermal carbonization wastewater via an innovative multistage anaerobic hythane reactor (MAHR): Organic conversion and microbial evolution
2023, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering