A differential protection technique for multi-terminal HVDC
Introduction
Voltage source Converter (VSC)-HVDC installations are promising power transmission methods for transmission of bulk power over long distances. The deployment of offshore wind power generation is expected to contribute a major portion of the world's future energy portfolio due to the expected depletion of fossil fuels along with the climate changes introduced by CO2 emissions. Offshore wind power generates a large amount of power that can be collected and transmitted to different onshore grids via HVDC systems. Different wind farms can be ultimately interconnected to multiple grids by means of multi-terminal HVDC (MTHVDC). Moreover, MTHVDC enables the transmission of high power levels, which can contribute to the realization of the future super grids such as the European super grid [1], [2], [3].
Many research articles discuss the protection of a two-terminal HVDC system such as the research reported in [1], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, these methods are suitable only for two-terminal HVDC systems. Some of these methods cannot be extended to MTHVDC while others have not been tested for operation in MTHVDC. Generally, the design of protection systems for MTHVDC grids is considered in its early stages. Limited research has tackled the protection problems of MTHVDC [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].
The research carried out in [9] has presented a thorough discussion concerning the DC-fault current and voltage waveform shapes, but it did not present a complete protection scheme for MTHVDC systems. The employment of circuit breakers (CBs) on the AC side of the converter for protection of MTHVDC was introduced in [10]. In case of faults inside the DC grid, all CBs on the AC sides of all terminals isolate the DC grid, then the faulted section is identified by means of a handshaking method [10]. The faulted section is isolated and the DC grid is restored afterwards. This method avoids using DC CBs, however, it takes a long time for isolation, fault zone identification, and system restoration. Moreover, the MTHVDC system is completely shut down unnecessarily. Alternatively, the use of DC CBs is now recommended to avoid unnecessary shutdown of healthy DC lines, isolate the fault quickly, and increase the DC system reliability [2], [3], [9], [11], [12], [15]. The research relevant to DC CBs is promising and several architectures of DC CBs have been developed in literature [2], [3], [9], [11], [12], [15]. With proper design of a protective relay, the DC CBs can isolate the faulted section quickly without the need to trip the whole DC system.
Yang et al. simulated the DC faults in MTHVDC including wind farms in [11] and proposed a distance protection scheme in [12] to be used in MTHVDC. However, this method did not address large systems with a high fault resistance. The largest rate of change of current is taken as a discrimination feature to identify the faulty line in [13]. However, it depends on system topology, where in some DC fault cases, the healthy line may have a larger rate of change of fault current. Moreover, this method avoids the deployment of DC CB; therefore, it takes a relatively long time for isolation. The work done in [14] presents three criteria to identify the faulted cables in meshed MTHVDC systems. These criteria are voltage Wavelet coefficients, current Wavelet coefficients, and voltage derivative and magnitude. Nevertheless, the authors did not consider the non-zero resistance fault case. Moreover, the proposed method depends on the initial change of voltage and current Wavelet coefficients, which may be confusing to the relay especially during the initial transient period of the fault. Furthermore, a combination between overhead lines and underground cables is not considered in this paper, which is the existing case in practical systems.
The proposed protection algorithm in this paper presents a differential protection method for protection of MTHVDC with different configurations of DC sections (overhead lines and underground cables). The method depends on calculating an energy index for the de-noised versions of positive and negative pole currents at both ends of a line to discriminate between internal and external faults. Pole to ground, pole to pole, and pole to pole to ground faults are simulated to test the proposed method. Various fault resistances were simulated to prove the reliability of the proposed method in low resistance and high resistance faults. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the MTHVDC model used to test the protection algorithm. Section 3 introduces the main concept of the proposed method. Protection functions and the design steps of the proposed algorithm are explained in Section 4. Section 5 presents the simulation results, and finally, Section 6 concludes the work presented in this paper.
Section snippets
Power system model
The most common voltage source-based HVDC converters are two-level (2L-VSC), three-level (3L-VSC), and Modular Multilevel Converters (MMC). The MMC can be classified into half-bridge MMC (HBMMC), full-bridge MMC (FBMMC), and clamped double sub-module based MMC (CDSM-MMC). The latter two types of MMC are out of the focus of this work, as they do not need DC CBs due to their current suppression capability during DC side faults, but operate with lower efficiency compared to the half-bridge MMC in
Concepts of the proposed algorithm
In MTHVDC, when a fault occurs in any section, all converters contribute to the fault current; VSC control is able to block the operation of the IGBT switches. DC fault in a line section fed from a VSC can be represented by three equivalent circuits representing three operational stages as shown in Fig. 2 where L and R are the line equivalent inductance and resistance from VSC to fault position. In order to analyze the short circuit current, the short circuit is decomposed into 3 different
Algorithm design
In order to design any protection system, the protection functions should be defined. The proposed protection algorithm functions are: (i) fast fault detection; (ii) internal and external fault discrimination; (iii) faulty pole classification; and (iv) identification of fault location.
Simulation results
Different types of faults with different fault resistances and different inception times are simulated to verify the proposed protection algorithm. The three-terminal model is used for the simulation studies. Numerous faults were simulated to verify the proposed concepts. For page limitation, samples of these studies are only presented. 12 cases are presented in Fig. 9 to show the effectiveness of the presented algorithm. All four fault types (positive pole to ground, negative pole to ground,
Conclusion
A new technique for protection of MTHVDC is presented. This technique is based on calculating energy contained in the de-noised signals at both ends of each section of the MTHVDC. Two signals are calculated in order to identify internal and external faults: operating and restraining signals. The ratio between the operating and restraining signals indicates an internal fault if it is larger than unity; otherwise the fault is external. Double ends traveling waves technique is used in this
Acknowledgements
This publication was made possible by NPRP grant NPRP 4-941-2-356 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
References (33)
- et al.
A single-ended fault location method for segmented HVDC transmission line
EPSR
(2014) - et al.
A novel pilot protection principle for VSC-HVDC cable lines based on fault component current
Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
(2013) - et al.
Analysis of grid faults in offshore wind farm with HVDC connection
Energy Procedia
(2013) - et al.
DC-side fault current management in extended multiterminal-HVDC-grids
- et al.
Transient fault studies in a multi-terminal VSC-HVDC grid utilizing protection means through DC circuit breakers
- et al.
A transient harmonic current protection scheme for HVDC transmission line
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
(2012) - et al.
A transient protection scheme for HVDC transmission line
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
(2012) - et al.
Distance protection for HVDC transmission lines considering frequency-dependent parameters
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
(2013) - et al.
Hybrid traveling wave/boundary protection for monopolar HVDC line
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
(2009) - et al.
Locating and isolating DC faults in multi-terminal DC systems
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
(2007)
Multi-terminal DC wind farm collection and transmission system internal fault analysis
Multiterminal DC wind farm collection grid internal fault analysis and protection design
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
Protection of VSC-multi-terminal HVDC against DC faults
Wavelet-based protection strategy for DC faults in multi-terminal VSC HVDC systems
IET Gen. Trans. Distrib.
VSC-HVDC system protection: a review of current methods
Future HVDC-grids employing modular multilevel converters and hybrid DC-breakers
Cited by (97)
A single-end reactor voltage based protection scheme for meshed VSC-interfaced HVDC grids
2024, Electric Power Systems ResearchA comprehensive review of potential protection methods for VSC multi-terminal HVDC systems
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsControl and protection of MMC-based HVDC systems: A review
2023, Energy ReportsA novel time-domain method for fault detection and classification in VSC-HVDC transmission lines
2022, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems