3D full-field biomechanical testing of a glenoid before and after implant placement
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common orthopaedic procedure to treat glenohumeral osteoarthritis [1], [2]. Loosening of the glenoid component is the most common cause of failure of this procedure [3], [4]. While the mechanisms underpinning glenoid loosening are not fully understood, mechanical factors are widely reported to play a key role [5], [6], [7], [8]. There is a need to study the biomechanics of glenoid bone and the glenoid components in shoulder implants.
Numerical methods, such as finite element analysis, have often been used to compute the biomechanics of glenoid bone and glenoid implants [8], [9]. The validity of the results from these models has been questioned, because these models may oversimplify the complex geometry, material properties and interface interactions in these structures. The results from these numerical models need to be validated by experimental measurements.
However, the conventional experimental methods for mechanical strain measurement in the research of biomechanics for glenoid and glenoid components have various disadvantages. Most importantly, they are inherently limited to measuring external surface strains, instead of full-field internal strains. Conventional strain gauges [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] can only measure strain at single locations and need to be glued to a surface on the specimens. The photoelasticity method [15], [16], [17] needs to be performed on replica models made with photoelastic materials or on photoelastic sheets that are glued to bone specimens. To obtain Moiré fringe pattern [18], [19], a grid of lines needs to be overlaid on the specimens.
Mechanical testing coupled with micro X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) and digital volume correlation is a non-contact method that can measure the internal structures and mechanics concurrently. It has been used to measure strain in engineering materials [18], [19], trabecular bone blocks [20], [21], [22], [23] and glenoid specimens with the absence of implants [24]. In our prior work, we have extended this method to study the biomechanics of dental implants in mandibles and to build corresponding numerical models of the micro-structures [25], [26].
In this study, mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT is carried out to apply various physiologically realistic loading conditions on a native and implanted glenoid. Digital volume correlation is performed to calculate the 3D full-field deformation and strain inside the glenoid. Analytical models, which incorporate the morphology measurements from the experiments, are developed to predict strain within the glenoid.
Section snippets
Mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT imaging
A fresh-frozen scapulae of upper extremity was obtained. The glenoid was isolated with the osteotomy being 44-mm medial to the glenoid face. All soft tissues were stripped off. The bottom half of the specimen was embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, Ortho-Jet BCA, Lang Dental, Wheeling, IL) with the glenoid face surface parallel to the floor. The specimen was kept frozen at −23 °C until 12-h prior to the test, when it was thawed. After completing the mechanical testing on native glenoid
Load–displacement relationships and stiffness
The load–displacement relationships obtained from the mechanical testing of native and implanted glenoid were nonlinear (Supplemental Fig. S1). The slopes of the load–displacement curves, i.e. stiffness of the specimen, increased with increasing displacement until the load reached 750 N. Then the load was held constant and the displacement kept increasing, reflecting the viscoelastic creep behaviors. For each loading condition, the native specimen was generally stiffer than the implanted
Discussion
The results of this study show that the mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT is a feasible and powerful method to characterize 3D full-field deformation and strain inside native and implanted glenoids. The noise in the results (no-load in Fig. 2 and Fig. S2) was much smaller than the range of deformation or strain inside glenoid under glenohumeral joint contact loading. The measured strain distributions on a typical virtual section of the specimen were in good agreement with the results
Conclusions
This paper presents the results of 3D full-field biomechanical testing of a glenoid before and after implant placement. The deformation and strain inside a native and implanted glenoid under several physiologically realistic loading conditions were obtained by digital volume correlation of micro-CT images taken at no-load and loaded conditions. Under glenohumeral contact loading, especially eccentric contact loading, part of the specimen was under compression while part was under tension. The
Declaration of Competing Interest
Dr. A. Armstrong is a paid consultant for Zimmer Biomet and Globus, and we acknowledge that all other authors do not have any conflict of interest. Authors were fully involved in the study and preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Timothy Ryan and Mr. Timothy Stecko at the Center for Quantitative Imaging (CQI) at Penn State University, United States of America for technical support on micro-CT scans. Appreciation is also extended to Mr. Richard Prevost at LaVision for useful technical discussions.
References (38)
- et al.
Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
(2009) In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living
J. Biomech.
(2009)- et al.
Acromion-fixation of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty
J. Biomech.
(2005) - et al.
Photoelastic comparison of strains in the underlying glenoid with metal-backed and all-polyethylene implants
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
(2008) Damage mechanisms in elastomeric foam composites: Multiscale X-ray computed tomography and finite element analyses
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2019)- et al.
A three-dimensional digital image correlation technique for strain measurements in microstructures
Exp. Mech.
(2004) - et al.
Performance of QCT-Derived scapula finite element models in predicting local displacements using digital volume correlation
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2019) Biomechanics and strain mapping in bone as related to immediately-loaded dental implants.
J. Biomech.
(2015)- et al.
Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2019) - et al.
Glenoid cement mantle characterization using micro–computed tomography of three cement application techniques
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
(2016)
A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
Liftoff resistance of augmented glenoid components during cyclic fatigue loading in the posterior-superior direction
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
J. Biomech.
Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus
J. Biomech.
Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid.
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
Total shoulder arthroplasty demographics, incidence, and complications-a nationwide inpatient sample database study
Surg. Technol. Int.
What can be learned from an analysis of 215 glenoid component failures?
J. Shoulder Elb. Surg.
Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.
Glenohumeral contact kinematics in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.
Cited by (12)
Quantifying the immediate post-implantation strain field of cadaveric tibiae implanted with cementless tibial trays: A time-elapsed micro-CT and digital volume correlation analysis during stair descent
2024, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsMicro-CT scan optimisation for mechanical loading of tibia with titanium tibial tray: A digital volume correlation zero strain error analysis
2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :However, their analysis considered displacement rather than strain, making direct comparison of errors difficult. Whereas previous papers show that cabinet micro-CT imaging combined with mechanical loading of large specimens is possible (Hussein et al., 2012; Palanca et al., 2016; Rapagna et al., 2019; Kusins et al., 2019; Boulanaache et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020b), they do not have a metallic orthopaedic component as big as a titanium tibial tray in their scanning volume, with the increased attenuation (and potential artifacts) that such a big component introduces. The above papers using DVC have alleviated this issue by removing the metallic components before scanning (Rapagna et al., 2019; Boulanaache et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020b), replicating an implant with a hollow aluminium pin (Marter et al., 2020) or a thin (150 μm) titanium coating (Sukjamsri et al., 2015), or, by using smaller implants (dental screws, 2.6–4.1 mm diameter), with hence less X-ray attenuation ((Zhou et al., 2020a; Du et al., 2015)).
Biomechanical phenotyping of minuscule soft tissues: An example in the rodent tricuspid valve
2022, Extreme Mechanics LettersCitation Excerpt :For example, multi-axial loading may be necessary to capture directionally-varying mechanical properties of tissues with a preferential microstructural organization [10]. Similarly, full-field measurement techniques may be necessary to capture spatially-varying mechanical properties and regions of tissue heterogeneity [11–14]. The biomechanics community has worked for decades to develop, test, and validate various biomechanical testing techniques and protocols for many types of soft tissues, beginning with the seminal work of Fung [15].
3D strain analysis of trabecular bone within the osteoarthritic humeral head subjected to stepwise compressive loads
2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsMicrostructure and mechanical behaviors of tibia for collagen-induced arthritic mice treated with gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells
2021, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :The mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT and the DVC method have been for strain mapping in trabecular bone blocks (Verhulp et al., 2004; Zauel et al., 2006), vertebra (Hussein et al., 2012), diaphysis of mouse tibia (Giorgi and Dall’Ara, 2018). In our prior works, we have used this method to map strain in native and implanted mandible (Du et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2020a) and glenoid (Zhou et al., 2020b). To the best of our knowledge, in this study for the first time this method was used to focus on the localized deformation and strain measurement in mouse proximal tibia.
Full-field comparisons between strains predicted by QCT-derived finite element models of the scapula and experimental strains measured by digital volume correlation
2020, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :However, as strain gauges only provide a discrete surface measurement, they do not offer insight into the mechanical strain distribution beneath the cortical shell. Recently, mechanical testing combined with high-resolution computed tomography (CT) and digital volume correlation (DVC) algorithms have been used to measure full-field strains throughout the structure of bone and has previously been applied to the shoulder (Kusins et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2020). DVC has also been applied to other bones such as the vertebra (Costa et al., 2017; Jackman et al., 2016; Tozzi et al., 2016) and femur (Rapagna et al., 2019; Ridzwan et al., 2017) and has previously been used as an experimental benchmark for comparison to full-field predictions of whole bone FEMs (Jackman et al., 2016; Kusins et al., 2020; Oliviero et al., 2018).