Neuropharmacology and analgesia
The combination of opioid and neurotensin receptor agonists improves their analgesic/adverse effect ratio

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.01.048Get rights and content

Abstract

Opioid and neurotensin (NT) receptors are expressed in both central and peripheral nervous systems where they modulate nociceptive responses. Nowadays, opioid analgesics like morphine remain the most prescribed drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, despite their daily used, opioids can produce life-threatening side effects, such as constipation or respiratory depression. Besides, NT analogs exert strong opioid-independent analgesia. Here, we thus hypothesized that the combined use of opioid and NT agonists would require lower doses to produce significant analgesic effects, hence decreasing opioid-induced adverse effects. We used isobologram analyses to determine if the combination of a NT brain-penetrant analog, An2-NT(8-13) with morphine results in an inhibitory, synergistic or additive analgesic response. We found that intravenous administration of An2-NT(8-13) reduced by 90% the nocifensive behaviors induced by formalin injection, at the dose of 0.018 mg/kg. Likewise, subcutaneous morphine reduced pain by 90% at 1.8 mg/kg. Importantly, isobologram analyses revealed that the co-injection of An2-NT(8-13) with morphine induced an additive analgesic response. We finally assessed the effects of morphine and An2-NT(8-13) on the gastrointestinal tract motility using the charcoal meal test. As opposed to morphine which significantly reduced the intestinal motility at the analgesic effective dose of 1.8 mg/kg, An2-NT(8-13) did not affect the charcoal meal intestinal transit at 0.018 mg/kg. Interestingly, at the dose providing 90% pain relief, the co-administration of morphine with An2-NT(8-13) had a reduced effect on constipation. Altogether, these results suggest that combining NT agonists with morphine may improve its analgesic/adverse effect ratio.

Introduction

Nowadays, opioids remain the most prescribed analgesics to treat moderate to severe pain (Gomes et al., 2014, Munzing, 2017). Morphine, the prototypical opioid, mediates its actions mainly through the Mu opioid receptor (MOP). In addition to analgesia, morphine also produces a number of unwanted and debilitating effects such as drowsiness, constipation, nausea, respiratory depression, and tolerance (Benyamin et al., 2008). Analgesic tolerance to morphine develops such that the dose needed to maintain a given level of analgesia has to be constantly increased. In order to limit the development of analgesic tolerance and concomitant unwanted effects, drug combination represents a promising alternative to currently used opioids. Indeed, combining an opioid with another analgesic drug might reduce the unwanted effects normally associated to each individual drug. This was indeed found to be true when morphine was intrathecally injected with dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist in a rat model of neuropathic pain (Kabalak et al., 2013). Similarly, the combined use of morphine and monoamine reuptake inhibitors was found to potentiate their respective analgesic effects in the rat formalin model (Shen et al., 2013).

We and others have shown that neurotensin (NT) can produce significant pain relief in various animal models of acute and chronic pain (Boules et al., 2006, Demeule et al., 2014, Fanelli et al., 2015, Fantegrossi et al., 2005, Guillemette et al., 2012, Roussy et al., 2008, Tétreault et al., 2013). First identified for its hypotensive effects, NT is also know to participate in a wide variety of physiological functions, including modulation of body temperature, myocardial performance, gastrointestinal tract motility and secretion (Osadchii, 2015, Zhao and Pothoulakis, 2006). According to its wide distribution throughout the central nervous system (Sarret and Beaudet, 2002), NT was also shown to exert brain functions, such as antipsychotic- and psychostimulant-like effects as well as regulation of food intake (Dobner, 2005, Dobner et al., 2003, Mazella et al., 2012). The physiological effects of NT are mediated by the activation of two closely related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), namely NTS1 and NTS2 (Vincent et al., 1999). Importantly, NT-mediated analgesia was found to be independent of the opioid system. There is indeed compelling evidence demonstrating that opioid antagonists do not suppress NT-induced antinociception (Behbehani and Pert, 1984, Clineschmidt et al., 1982, Osbahr et al., 1981). Furthermore, NT also appears to be more potent than morphine in various pain tests (Nemeroff et al., 1979, al-Rodhan et al., 1991).

In the present study, we hypothesized that combining opioid and NT peptides will present some advantages over pure opioid-based therapies. We thus undertook to determine whether systemically administered morphine combined to An2-NT(8-13), consisting of the brain-penetrant peptide Angiopep-2 (An2) conjugated to NT(8-13) (Demeule et al., 2014), can exert additive or synergistic antinociceptive interaction. We therefore evaluated the analgesic effects of combining morphine and An2-NT(8-13) in the rat model of formalin-induced persistent pain, and determined the extent of drug interaction using isobolograms. We further determined whether this drug combination can reduce opioid-induced constipation or NT-induced drop in blood pressure, thus leading to a better analgesic benefit/adverse effect ratio.

Section snippets

Animals

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (225–250 g; Charles River Laboratories, St-Constant, QC, Canada) were maintained in a 12-h light/dark cycle and had ad libitum access to lab chow and water. Rats were acclimatized for 3 days to experimental room, manipulations and devices prior to the behavioral studies. All experiments were performed in a quiet room, different than the housing area, between 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. by the same experimenter. All experiments were approved by the animal care

Antinociceptive effect of morphine and An2-NT(8-13) in the rat formalin test

We first determined the analgesic potencies of morphine and An2-NT(8-13) following separate administration. Our results demonstrate that the administration of morphine (0.3–10 mg/kg, s.c.) induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the rat formalin test (Fig. 1A). The most important effect of morphine was observed during the inflammatory phase (21–60 min). Indeed, at 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, morphine completely inhibited the formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors during the inflammatory

Discussion

Despite its negative impact on the patient's health outcomes, chronic pain remains a highly prevalent, debilitating and costly medical condition that is frequently undertreated or inadequately managed. Indeed, the pharmacotherapy of chronic pain, which mainly depends on the use of opioids still shows limited analgesic efficacy and dose-limiting adverse effects in clinical practice (Bruneau et al., 2018). Although the recent research efforts have significantly improved our understanding of pain

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) (Grant nos. MOP-123399 and MOP-136871) awarded to L.G. and (Grant no. FDN-148413) awarded to PS. L.G. is the recipient of a Senior Salary support from the Fonds de la Recherche Québec – Santé. PS holds a Canada Research Chair in Neurophysiopharmacology of Chronic Pain. E.E. was the recipient of a PhD fellowship from the Institut de pharmacologie de Sherbrooke. E.E., P.S. and L.G. designed the study. E.E. and J.C.

References (66)

  • S.G. Dennis et al.

    Pain modulation by adrenergic agents and morphine as measured by three pain tests

    Life Sci.

    (1980)
  • P.R. Dobner et al.

    Neurotensin: dual roles in psychostimulant and antipsychotic drug responses

    Life Sci.

    (2003)
  • D. Dubuisson et al.

    The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats

    Pain

    (1977)
  • W.E. Fantegrossi et al.

    Antinociceptive, hypothermic, hypotensive, and reinforcing effects of a novel neurotensin receptor agonist, NT69L, in rhesus monkeys

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2005)
  • P.K. Gessner

    Isobolographic analysis of interactions: an update on applications and utility

    Toxicology

    (1995)
  • I. Gilron et al.

    Combination pharmacotherapy for management of chronic pain: from bench to bedside

    Lancet Neurol.

    (2013)
  • P. Holzer

    Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

    Regul. Pept.

    (2009)
  • Y. Hong et al.

    Peripheral opioid modulation of pain and inflammation in the formalin test

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1995)
  • S. Hunskaar et al.

    The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain

    Pain

    (1987)
  • W.J. Martin et al.

    Differential effects of neurotoxic destruction of descending noradrenergic pathways on acute and persistent nociceptive processing

    Pain

    (1999)
  • C.B. Nemeroff et al.

    Neurotensin: central nervous system effects of a hypothalamic peptide

    Brain Res.

    (1977)
  • O.E. Osadchii

    Emerging role of neurotensin in regulation of the cardiovascular system

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2015)
  • T. Pemovska et al.

    Recent advances in combinatorial drug screening and synergy scoring

    Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.

    (2018)
  • N.R. al-Rodhan et al.

    Structure-antinociceptive activity of neurotensin and some novel analogues in the periaqueductal gray region of the brainstem

    Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • G. Roussy et al.

    Altered morphine-induced analgesia in neurotensin type 1 receptor null mice

    Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • P. Sarret et al.

    Chapter VI Neurotensin receptors in the central nervous system

  • N. Sevostianova et al.

    Effects of morphine on formalin-induced nociception in rats

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2003)
  • C.O. Stiller et al.

    Opioid-induced release of neurotensin in the periaqueductal gray matter of freely moving rats

    Brain Res.

    (1997)
  • B.M. Tyler-McMahon et al.

    Neurotensin: peptide for the next millennium

    Regul. Pept.

    (2000)
  • J.-P. Vincent et al.

    Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1999)
  • D. Zhao et al.

    Effects of NT on gastrointestinal motility and secretion, and role in intestinal inflammation

    Peptides

    (2006)
  • A.I. Basbaum

    Distinct neurochemical features of acute and persistent pain

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1999)
  • R. Benyamin et al.

    Opioid complications and side effects

    Pain. Physician

    (2008)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of a neurotensin receptor type 2 (NTS2) analgesic macrocyclic analog

      2021, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      As shown in Fig. 3E, morphine combined with CR-01-64 significantly increased the tail-flick latency compared to CR-01-64 or morphine alone, thus indicating that NT analogs are able to potentiate the analgesic effects of morphine. Accordingly, the combination of opioids with NT derivatives was found to increase analgesia through synergistic or additive effects [88–90]. The antinociceptive effect of the macrocyclic compound CR-01-64 was then measured in the persistent inflammatory pain model induced by formalin by monitoring the paw licking, biting, shaking and lifting nociceptive behaviors induced by an intraplantar injection of diluted formalin (5%) into the right hind paw.

    • Pain relief devoid of opioid side effects following central action of a silylated neurotensin analog

      2020, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This increasing attention is probably driven in part by the fact that NT drugs act as effective opioid-free medications for pain management, producing significant pain relief in various animal models of acute and chronic pain, including neuropathic pain for which opioids have shown their limitations (Guillemette et al., 2012; Perez de Vega et al., 2018; Tetreault et al., 2013). Importantly, the combination of NT analogs to opioids has also the potential to exert complementary (synergistic or additive) analgesic actions, thereby minimizing the adverse effects related to chronic opioid use (Boules et al., 2009, 2011; Eiselt et al., 2019). In recent years, changes in the pharmaceutical industry have led to renewed interest in the use of peptides as therapeutics (Fosgerau and Hoffmann, 2015; Kaspar and Reichert, 2013).

    • Neurotensin in reward processes

      2020, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As described here, neurotensinergic signaling is involved in a number of different reward-related behaviors and plays a variety of contextually- and regionally-dependent roles. There has been interest in manipulating this system in the pursuit of novel treatments for schizophrenia (Kinkead and Nemeroff, 2006; Meltzer et al., 2004; Vadnie et al., 2016), pain (Dobner, 2006; Eiselt et al., 2019), and substance use disorders (Felszeghy et al., 2007; Ferraro et al., 2016). In the treatment of schizophrenia, agonism of the NTS system may serve as an antipsychotic on its own (Vadnie et al., 2016), or may serve to ameliorate the effects of a chronic antipsychotic regimen (Servonnet et al., 2017).

    • Fascia iliaca compartment block reduces pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2019, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Morphine, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, relieves pain by binding and activating the receptors in both the central and peripheral nervous systems [24]. As the most widely used narcotic for postoperative pain control, morphine has been reported a high incidence of adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, headache, and urine retention, which could severely impede the postoperative convalescence [25,26]. Besides, drug dependence is also a major concern.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text