Midwater fishes collected in the vicinity of the Sub-Polar Front, Mid-North Atlantic Ocean, during ECOMAR pelagic sampling

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.08.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The ECOMAR project was a multidisciplinary process study conducted in the mid-North Atlantic, coincident hydrodynamically with the Sub-Polar Front (SPF; 48–54°N) and topographically with Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, as part of the Census of Marine Life field project MAR-ECO. Midwater trawling was conducted during the 2007 and 2009 ECOMAR expeditions at 14 stations north and south of the SPF, day and night, in four discrete depth intervals from 0 to 1000 m. A total of 56 species of midwater fishes representing 44 genera and 18 families were collected, several of which are new records for the region and/or were not previously sampled during MAR-ECO sampling. An annotated species list with depth-of-capture data is provided. Three species of the genus Cyclothone (Cyclothone braueri, Cyclothone microdon and Cyclothone pallida) and the myctophid Benthosema glaciale combined to contribute ~88% of all specimens collected. This finding differs from results of previous net-based sampling in the same area, likely due to sampling scheme differences (diel sampling, upper 800 m concentration) and gear selectivity (mesh size, trawl speed). Quantitative data from ECOMAR midwater sampling and the previous 2004 G.O. Sars MAR-ECO expedition are compared. Despite differences in gear between the major MAR-ECO expeditions, abundance estimates of some dominant species were remarkably similar. Data showed that the SPF is an asymmetrical, taxon-specific biogeographic boundary for deep-pelagic fishes in the North Atlantic; the SPF is semi-permeable to some species in one direction, while a strong boundary for species in another direction. Deeper-living fish species did not appear as affected by the SPF as a boundary.

Introduction

The pelagic, demersal and benthic deep-sea fauna in the vicinity of the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR hereafter), from Iceland to the Azores, was intensively investigated as the focus of the Census of Marine Life project MAR-ECO (Bergstad et al., 2008). The Charlie Gibbs Fracture Zone (CGFZ) region of the MAR, and the surmounting Sub-Polar Front (SPF), located roughly halfway between Iceland and the Azores, was identified as the major topographic and oceanographic transition zone along the study transect (Vecchione et al., 2010). The upper water column north of the CGFZ, with cold surface waters, is biogeographically classified as the Subarctic Atlantic Province, while the area to the south, with warmer surface waters, is classified as the North Atlantic Current Province (UNESCO, 2009). The ECOMAR programme (Priede et al., 2013) was designed to investigate the CGFZ/SPF area, from the surface to the benthos, with the aims of evaluating mid-ocean productivity and biomass, and identifying differences in biology relative to the CGFZ/SPF (north/south) and the MAR axis (east/west). During ECOMAR cruises JC011 (2007) and JC037 (2009) the pelagic nekton/micronekton (fishes, macrocrustaceans, and pelagic mollusks) were sampled with a RMT 1+8 opening/closing rectangular midwater trawl (Letessier et al., 2011, Letessier et al., 2012). Sampling was conducted at sites north and south of the CGFZ, within the larger Sub-Polar Frontal Zone, in discrete-depth fashion from the surface to 800 m, with one trawl between 800 and 1000 m. This sampling program complements efforts of the MAR-ECO project in which dual-warp, large-mesh midwater trawls were used (Sutton et al., 2008, Wenneck et al., 2008, Klimpel et al., 2010, Heino et al., 2011, Cook et al., 2013). Here we present results of ECOMAR sampling with respect to deep-pelagic fish species composition, capture location relative to the primary gradient of the SPF, depth of capture as a function of solar cycle, and biogeography of species collected. Range extensions and new records for the MAR-ECO project are noted. Quantitative results presented here are compared in a limited fashion to those of previous MAR-ECO midwater sampling during the 2004 G.O. Sars MAR-ECO expedition. Sample size limitations preclude a comprehensive analysis of the SPF as a faunal transition zone, but biogeographic patterns displayed by the dominant components of the ichthyofaunal are presented, and qualitative aspects of the nature of the SPF transition zone are discussed.

Section snippets

Methods

Sampling was conducted at 14 stations located north and south of the CGFZ region of the MAR, both east and west of the ridge axis (i.e., northeast, northwest, southeast and southwest stations), with these stations straddling the primary water mass gradient of the Sub-Polar Front (Table 1, Fig. 1). A multiple rectangular midwater trawl (RMT1+8 M; Baker et al., 1973, Roe and Shale, 1979) consisting of one large net (mouth area of 8 m2, mesh size of 4.5 mm) and one small net (mouth area of 1 m2, mesh

Results

Abundances of all fishes collected during ECOMAR midwater sampling, listed by depth stratum, are presented in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4. A list of species, raw numbers collected, location, depth, known distribution, and specific annotations, if relevant, are provided below.

Summary and discussion

A minimum of 56 species were identified from 6304 specimens collected, with some taxa (e.g., Melamphaes spp.) awaiting further revision before species determination. Six species (Cyclothone alba, Diaphus roei, Eustomias monodactylus, Magnisudis atlantica, Mentodus longirostris, and Psednos andriashevi) were not collected during previous MAR-ECO sampling efforts. The specimens of P. andriashevi are the second and third known (the other being holotype), and the record of M. longirostris

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Andrew S. Brierley for supervision and overall guidance of this work. We are grateful to Miss Susan Evans and all helpers at sea for enthusiastic sorting of catches. We thank Dr. Martin Cox and Mr. Ben Boorman for RMT fishing activities. We are grateful to the National Environment Research Council for shiptime and the School of Biology for funding toward Dr. Tom Bech Letessier's PhD. We thank MAR-ECO for funding a workshop dedicated to the analysis of the ECOMAR fish catches.

References (53)

  • N. Chernova

    A review of the genus Psednos (Pisces, Liparidae) with description of ten new species from the north Atlantic and southwestern Indian Ocean

    Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. (Harvard)

    (2001)
  • B.W. Coad et al.

    Annotated list of the arctic marine fishes of Canada. Miscellaneous Report

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2004)
  • D.M. Cohen

    Bathylagidae

  • J.E. Craddock et al.

    Bristlemouths. Family Gonostomatidae

  • J.E. Craddock et al.

    Lanternfishes. Family Myctophidae

  • A.W. Ebeling et al.

    Melamphaidae III. Systematics and distribution of the species in the bathypelagic fish genus Scopelagadus Vaillant

    Dana Rep.

    (1963)
  • Eschmeyer, W.N., (Ed)., 2013. Genera, Species, References....
  • Figueiredo, J.L. de, dos Santos, A.P., Yamaguti, N., Bernardes, R.A., Del Bianco Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L., 2002....
  • Fricke, R., 1999. Fishes of the Mascarene Islands (Réunion, Mauritius, Rodriguez): an annotated checklist, with...
  • R.H. Gibbs

    Astronesthidae

  • R.H. Gibbs

    Chauliodontidae

  • R.H. Gibbs

    Stomiidae

  • Gibbs, R.H. Jr., Barnett, M.A., 1990. Melanostomiidae. In: Quero, J.C., Hureau, J.C., Karrer, C., Post, A., Saldanha,...
  • M. Heino et al.

    Catchability of pelagic trawls for sampling deep-living nekton in the Mid-North Atlantic

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2011)
  • T.L. Hopkins et al.

    The feeding ecology of four hatchetfishes (Sternoptychidae) in the eastern Gulf of Mexico

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (1985)
  • P.A. Hulley

    Myctophidae

  • Cited by (19)

    • Influence of anticyclonic, warm-core eddies on mesopelagic fish assemblages in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean

      2021, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, eddies may entrain communities from their origin, harboring and dispersing species from source waters to the surrounding ocean. Numerous studies have surveyed pelagic waters throughout the Atlantic to describe mesopelagic fishes and identify species distributions (Backus et al. 1969, 1971; Jahn and Backus 1976; Fock et al., 2004; Sutton et al. 2008, 2013; Cook et al., 2013; Olivar et al., 2017). In the Northwest Atlantic, early surveys attributed observed changes in fish species composition along transects from the Caribbean north to the Gulf Stream to therecently discovered thermal front in the Sargasso Sea (Backus et al., 1969).

    • The deep scattering layer micronektonic fish faunas of the Atlantic mesopelagic ecoregions with comparison of the corresponding decapod shrimp faunas

      2018, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many fishes less than 70 mm in length likely escaped through 63.5 mm mesh in the forward section of the net, and species with populations centered above or below the deep scattering layer were not captured in numbers proportionate to total abundance in the water column. Both factors contributed to the relative infrequency in the material of species of the genus Cyclothone, a group that other studies have found to equal or exceed myctophids in abundance (Badcock and Merrett, 1976; Cook et al., 2013; Sutton et al., 2013). It is well established that vertically migrating fish species concentrate at different depths during both day and night (e.g., Badcock, 1970; Badcock and Merrett, 1976; Frost and McCrone, 1979; Kinzer and Schulz, 1985).

    • A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone

      2017, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      This ecoregion encompasses an eddy field region, expanding eastwards and tracking the flow of the Gulf Stream. It is a weak transition zone for northern species due to tropical submergence, but a strong boundary for southern species (Sutton et al., 2013; Vecchione et al., 2015). The Subpolar Front is the northern boundary, though this boundary becomes quite weak east of about 25°W (Krefft, 1976).

    • The effect of the North Atlantic Subpolar Front as a boundary in pelagic biogeography decreases with increasing depth and organism size

      2015, Progress in Oceanography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Below this depth, the species assemblages were more consistent throughout the area studied. Also, the horizontal distribution of several taxa across the SPF seems to be asymmetric: “southern species” have limited dispersal north of the SPF, while cold-water species are not so restricted by the SPF (Sutton et al., 2013). Are the patterns that were found in a few taxonomic groups general for the pelagic community?

    • The ecosystem of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at the sub-polar front and Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone; ECO-MAR project strategy and description of the sampling programme 2007-2010

      2013, Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The biodiversity and abundance of zooplankton, especially euphausiids over the MAR are described by Letessier et al. (2009, 2011, 2012). Sutton et al. (2013) list 56 species of mid-water fishes captured during ECOMAR cruises JC011 and JC037. Numerous samples of benthic fauna from the CGFZ area were collected during the ECOMAR cruises (Gebruk et al., 2013; Priede et al., 2013b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, 8000 North Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, FL 33004, USA.

    2

    Present address: Centre for Marine Futures, The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, UWA (M470), Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

    3

    Present address: Marine Research Institute, Skúlgata 4, P.O. Box 1390, Reykjavík, Iceland.

    View full text