Elsevier

Dental Materials

Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2018, Pages 657-666
Dental Materials

Evaluation of biofilm formation on novel copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)-based resins for dental restoratives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Biofilm formation on the surface of CuAAC-based resins and composites was assessed.

  • A significant reduction in biofilm bioburden was observed on CuAAC-based materials.

  • Longevity of dental restorations that contain CuAAC-based materials may be enhanced.

Abstract

Objective

For the past several decades, the resins used in dental restorations have been plagued with numerous problems, including their implication in biofilm formation and secondary caries. The need for alternative resins is critical, and evaluation of biofilm formation on these resins is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro biofilm formation on the surface of novel copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)-based resins and composites.

Methods

CuAAC-based resins/composites made from varying azide monomers and different copper concentrations were compared with BisGMA-TEGDMA resins/composites that served as the control. Biofilms were formed using a mono-species model containing a luciferase-expressing strain of Streptococcus mutans. Luciferase activity was measured and the number of viable bacteria was enumerated on biofilms associated with each resin and composite.

Results

A significant reduction (p < 0.05) in luciferase activity, and the number of viable bacteria recovered from biofilms on CuAAC-based resins and composites was observed in comparison to biofilms associated with the BisGMA-TEGDMA controls.

Significance

CuAAC-based resins do still allow for the formation of biofilms; however, the statistically significant reduction of growth that was associated with the CuAAC resin may enhance the longevity of restorations that incorporate CuAAC-based materials.

Introduction

The oral cavity is a complex environment where over 700 bacterial species have been detected in the oral common microbiota [1], [2], [3], [4]. Within this diverse community of bacteria found in the mouth, Streptococcus mutans, due to its acidogenic nature and its ability to form biofilms on tooth surfaces, is one of the primary species associated with human dental caries and secondary caries formation [5], [6]. Recent studies have also indicated that numerous other oral bacteria, most notably those that are acid producing, work together to form polymicrobial biofilms that ultimately initiate and further develop tooth decay [7], [8], [9], [10]. In fact, Lactobacillus acidophilus, another commonly found oral acid-producing bacterium, has been found in high numbers in both superficial and deep dental caries [11], [12], and its ability to form biofilms on tooth surfaces is enhanced by the presence of S. mutans, augmenting the ability to cause carious lesions [13], [14].

More than 100 million dental restorations are performed each year and over 50% of these restorations utilize resin-based composites over amalgams [15], [16], [17]. Resin-based composites have many benefits over amalgams, including improved aesthetics, adhesive strength, and filling capability [16], [17], [18]. However, resin-based restoratives frequently have limited longevity due to restoration failure, commonly caused by degradation or fracture of the restoration directly or by failure due to secondary caries formation at the margins around the restoration [17], [19], [20], [21]. Nearly all resin-based composite restoratives are methacrylate-based and consist of a co-monomer mixture comprised from components such as 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl] propane (BisGMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) [18], [22] or related monomers. The functional integrity of these methacrylate restoratives relies on the polymerization of resin monomers, and their limited conversion leads not only deterioration of the restorative, but also to release of these monomers into the surrounding tissues [17], [18], [23], [24]. Additionally, numerous studies have demonstrated sensitivity of these restorations in general, and these methacrylate monomers specifically, to hydrolysis by salivary and bacterial esterases found in the oral cavity, resulting in biodegradation by-products (BBPs) [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. The biodegradation of these restorations increases bacterial leakage between resin-dentin interfaces, leading to further damage to the tooth [32]. Additionally, residual monomers released from resin restorations and resulting BBPs, such as methacrylic acid (MA), bishydroxypropoxyphenyl-propane (Bis-HPPP), and triethylene glycol (TEG), have been thoroughly investigated and implicated in adverse manifestations in the host. In particular, these effects include disruption of immune function [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], cytotoxicity [38], [39], [40], [41], microbiota shifts [42], and accelerated formation of biofilms [43], [44], [45], [46].

Due to the various pitfalls associated with the currently used methacrylate-based composites, the development of new, longer-lasting polymers for dental restoration is of utmost importance and could have a significant positive impact on global oral health. Since bacterial accumulation and biofilms have been implicated in the deterioration of the current BisGMA-TEGDMA based composites, novel resins that have structural stability and also limit bacterial prevalence are desirable to prolong the longevity of dental resins. Recently, novel resins have been developed that specifically have antibacterial properties to resist biofilm formation and incorporate antimicrobial monomers such as novel quaternary ammonium methacrylates [47], [48], [49], methacryloxylethylcetyl dimethyl ammonium chloride [50], and 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) [51], [52], [53], [54]. Additional strategies have also included the inclusion of alternative antimicrobial agents such as fluoride [49], [55], [56], silver nanoparticles [57], [58], [59], [60], and chlorhexidine [61], [62], [63], to name a few. While providing additional benefits over the currently used resin-based composite systems, many of the approaches listed above continue to rely on the existing methacrylate system and, as such, have been plagued with similar challenges.

Recently, the development and analysis of novel visible light-initiated copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)-based resins that possess superior mechanical properties, significantly reduced shrinkage stress and suitable polymerization kinetics as compared to BisGMA-based polymers [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70]. However, the ability of these resins to promote or restrict bacterial growth has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro biofilm formation on the surface of novel copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)-based resins.

Section snippets

Materials/methods

1,3-Bis(isocyanatomethyl)cyclohexane, 1,3-bis(2-isocyanatopropan-2-yl)benzene, 4,4-methylenebis(cyclohexyl isocyanate), 4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate), dibutyltin dilaurate, tetrahydrofuran, 6-chloro-1-hexanol, sodium azide, 1,1,1-tris(hydroxymethyl)propane, propargyl bromide, propargyl alcohol, 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl isocyanate, copper(II) chloride, N,N,N′,N′,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA), camphorquinone (CQ), toluene, and acetonitrile were used as received from Sigma

BisGMA-TEGDMA and CuAAC resin formulation

A BisGMA:TEGDMA (70:30 weight ratio) mixture with 2 weight percentage of CQ was prepared by physical mixing. Stoichiometric mixtures of a diazide, trialkyne (a mole ratio of 1:1 to N3:alkyne), with different mole percentage of CuCl2[PMDETA] per functionality and 2 mol% of CQ were prepared, and methanol was added to homogenize the mixture and later removed in vacuo.

BisGMA-TEGDMA and CuAAC composite formulation

A BisGMA-TEGDMA (70:30 weight ratio) mixture with 2-weight percentage of CQ was prepared by physical mixing. 60-weight percentage of

Results

The bioluminescence and viable count analysis of bacteria associated with biofilms grown on CuAAC-based resins showed a significant reduction when compared to that quantified for the BisGMA-TEGDMA control resin discs. Fig. 2A displays the production of luciferase activity by S. mutans by non-disrupted biofilms associated with CuAAC-based resin discs and BisGMA-TEGDMA resin discs. Luciferase activity was measured at 2-min intervals, but only the 6-min interval is shown due to it having the

Discussion

For this study, we evaluated the ability of a monospecies biofilm to form on novel CuAAC-based resins. S. mutans is readily used as a model organism to evaluate dental restorative materials, particularly their antibacterial effects. Recently, Esteban Florez et al. [73] reported a non-disruptive evaluation of S. mutans biofilm formation on resin-based composites and showed correlation between luciferase activity and viable bacteria recovered from biofilms on the composites. In this study, we

Conclusions

Oral biofilms have been implicated in the failure of currently used dental materials; therefore, a dental material having improved mechanical performance and a reduction in biofilm formation may enhance the longevity of dental restoratives. In this study, we noted a statistically significant reduction in S. mutans biofilm bioburden on CuAAC resins and CuAAC-based microfilled composites, which in combination with CuAAC-based materials’ superior mechanical properties and significantly reduced

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health/NIDCR grant U01DE023774 and U01DE023777. We would like to thank Dr. Justin Merritt for kindly providing the luciferase expressing S. mutans that we used in this study.

References (86)

  • Y. Delaviz et al.

    Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges

    Dent Mater

    (2014)
  • F. Jaffer et al.

    Interactions between resin monomers and commercial composite resins with human saliva derived esterases

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • B.A. Lin et al.

    Identifying enzyme activities within human saliva which are relevant to dental resin composite biodegradation

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • A. Eckhardt et al.

    Influence of TEGDMA on the mammalian cell cycle in comparison with chemotherapeutic agents

    Dent Mater

    (2010)
  • S. Krifka et al.

    Resin monomer-induced differential activation of MAP kinases and apoptosis in mouse macrophages and human pulp cells

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • S. Krifka et al.

    A review of adaptive mechanisms in cell responses towards oxidative stress caused by dental resin monomers

    Biomaterials

    (2013)
  • H. Schweikl et al.

    Interaction between LPS and a dental resin monomer on cell viability in mouse macrophages

    Dent Mater

    (2016)
  • P. Khalichi et al.

    The influence of triethylene glycol derived from dental composite resins on the regulation of Streptococcus mutans gene expression

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • L. Sadeghinejad et al.

    Mechanistic, genomic and proteomic study on the effects of BisGMA-derived biodegradation product on cariogenic bacteria

    Dent Mater

    (2017)
  • R.P. Sousa et al.

    In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation

    J Dent

    (2009)
  • J.M. Antonucci et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of dimethacrylates containing quaternary ammonium functionalities for dental applications

    Dent Mater

    (2012)
  • F. Li et al.

    Effects of a dental adhesive incorporating antibacterial monomer on the growth, adherence and membrane integrity of Streptococcus mutans

    J Dent

    (2009)
  • S. Imazato et al.

    Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB

    Biomaterials

    (1999)
  • S. Imazato et al.

    Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB

    Dent Mater

    (2003)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    Effects of dual antibacterial agents MDPB and nano-silver in primer on microcosm biofilm, cytotoxicity and dentine bond properties

    J Dent

    (2013)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Formulation and characterization of a novel fluoride-releasing dental composite

    Dent Mater

    (2006)
  • M.A. Melo et al.

    Novel dental adhesives containing nanoparticles of silver and amorphous calcium phosphate

    Dent Mater

    (2013)
  • P.D. Riggs et al.

    Chlorhexidine release from room temperature polymerising methacrylate systems

    Biomaterials

    (2000)
  • D. Leung et al.

    Chlorhexidine-releasing methacrylate dental composite materials

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • H.B. Song et al.

    Reduced shrinkage stress via photo-initiated copper(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition polymerizations of azide-alkyne resins

    Dent Mater

    (2016)
  • H.B. Song et al.

    Kinetics and mechanics of photo-polymerized triazole-containing thermosetting composites via the copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition

    Dent Mater

    (2017)
  • F.L. Esteban Florez et al.

    Real-time assessment of Streptococcus mutans biofilm metabolism on resin composite

    Dent Mater

    (2016)
  • J. Merritt et al.

    Non-disruptive, real-time analyses of the metabolic status and viability of Streptococcus mutans cells in response to antimicrobial treatments

    J Microbiol Methods

    (2005)
  • N. Zhang et al.

    Development of a multifunctional adhesive system for prevention of root caries and secondary caries

    Dent Mater

    (2015)
  • T.F. Mah et al.

    Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents

    Trends Microbiol

    (2001)
  • M.A. Perez-Diaz et al.

    Silver nanoparticles with antimicrobial activities against Streptococcus mutans and their cytotoxic effect

    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl

    (2015)
  • M.F. Gutierrez et al.

    Mechanical and microbiological properties and drug release modeling of an etch-and-rinse adhesive containing copper nanoparticles

    Dent Mater

    (2017)
  • J.A. Aas et al.

    Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2005)
  • K. Hojo et al.

    Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development

    J Dent Res

    (2009)
  • M. Faveri et al.

    Microbiological diversity of generalized aggressive periodontitis by 16S rRNA clonal analysis

    Oral Microbiol Immunol

    (2008)
  • H. Yasunaga et al.

    Exploration of bacterial species associated with the salivary microbiome of individuals with a low susceptibility to dental caries

    Clin Oral Investig

    (2017)
  • S.D. Forssten et al.

    Streptococcus mutans, caries and simulation models

    Nutrients

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text